Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6896|Canberra, AUS

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Rosse_modest wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:


napoleon was a n00b, didnt give enough food for his man.

most countries in the world do sell their weapons to dangerouse states, i have to admit that 1 moronic taiwanese commander sold our Night vision goggles which were given for free from the US, he sold it to the enemy (china) and that is kinda retarded
Since when didn't he give enough food to his men?
He was probably one of the greatest military commanders to ever walk the face of this planet. His only weakness was he was a little too eager to take on everyone at the same time.
yes that was also the problem, if u fight too fast, u lose fast. But the greatest military commander of them all is not from europe... it was ghankis khan, ruled the largest empire ever. Took over china, he failed in japan coz there was a typhoon and destroyed all his ships (4k ships!!!). reached hungary...
However, in his day, Napoleon was the closest thing you'll get to a tactical genius.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6896|Canberra, AUS

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Rosse_modest wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:


napoleon was a n00b, didnt give enough food for his man.

most countries in the world do sell their weapons to dangerouse states, i have to admit that 1 moronic taiwanese commander sold our Night vision goggles which were given for free from the US, he sold it to the enemy (china) and that is kinda retarded
Since when didn't he give enough food to his men?
He was probably one of the greatest military commanders to ever walk the face of this planet. His only weakness was he was a little too eager to take on everyone at the same time.
yes that was also the problem, if u fight too fast, u lose fast. But the greatest military commander of them all is not from europe... it was ghankis khan, ruled the largest empire ever. Took over china, he failed in japan coz there was a typhoon and destroyed all his ships (4k ships!!!). reached hungary...
However, in his day, Napoleon was the closest thing you'll get to a tactical genius.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
BEE_Grim_Reaper
Member
+15|6928|Germany

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Rosse_modest wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:


napoleon was a n00b, didnt give enough food for his man.

most countries in the world do sell their weapons to dangerouse states, i have to admit that 1 moronic taiwanese commander sold our Night vision goggles which were given for free from the US, he sold it to the enemy (china) and that is kinda retarded
Since when didn't he give enough food to his men?
He was probably one of the greatest military commanders to ever walk the face of this planet. His only weakness was he was a little too eager to take on everyone at the same time.
yes that was also the problem, if u fight too fast, u lose fast. But the greatest military commander of them all is not from europe... it was ghankis khan, ruled the largest empire ever. Took over china, he failed in japan coz there was a typhoon and destroyed all his ships (4k ships!!!). reached hungary...
Actually, I would like to add some corrections here:

Ghengis Khan (whom you spelt Ghankis Khan) did not really rule the larges empire ever. He did not take over China, he did not try to invade Japan, he did not reach hungary.

Ghengis Khan did reach the North Korean Border and the Kaspian Sea, the Ukraine and some nothern parts of China. He was born in 1155, 1162 or 1167 (historians are not sure) and died 1227.

The Mongolian Khan you are referring to was actually Kublai Khan (born 1215, died 1297). He managed to conquer China, becoming the founder of the imperial Yuan Dynasty. He attempted to invade Japan twice: 1274 and 1281. Both attempts failed due to Taifuns.

The "Mongol", who reached Hungary was actually Attila the Hun.

Concerning the issue that Napoleon was not able to feed his troops: One must always be aware that at that time the concept of supply lines was not established yet. Ammunition was carried with the army, food was acquired in the area the army was located in. When the Russians did perform the practice of scorched earth and partisan attacks at strategic points plus the increasingly bad weather due to a harsh winter, no food was left and the army of Napoleon diminished even more. One cannot say, that Napoleon was a Noob, because he managed to conquer more of Europe than even Hitler had been capable of with opponents comparably stronger and more determined than the later England and France. Also his tactics and strategies where the base of even modern warfare (war of mobility and circumvention instead of static assault and defense). These principles where actually applied in the American Civil War as well.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6896|Canberra, AUS

BEE_Grim_Reaper wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Rosse_modest wrote:


Since when didn't he give enough food to his men?
He was probably one of the greatest military commanders to ever walk the face of this planet. His only weakness was he was a little too eager to take on everyone at the same time.
yes that was also the problem, if u fight too fast, u lose fast. But the greatest military commander of them all is not from europe... it was ghankis khan, ruled the largest empire ever. Took over china, he failed in japan coz there was a typhoon and destroyed all his ships (4k ships!!!). reached hungary...
Actually, I would like to add some corrections here:

Ghengis Khan (whom you spelt Ghankis Khan) did not really rule the larges empire ever. He did not take over China, he did not try to invade Japan, he did not reach hungary.

Ghengis Khan did reach the North Korean Border and the Kaspian Sea, the Ukraine and some nothern parts of China. He was born in 1155, 1162 or 1167 (historians are not sure) and died 1227.

The Mongolian Khan you are referring to was actually Kublai Khan (born 1215, died 1297). He managed to conquer China, becoming the founder of the imperial Yuan Dynasty. He attempted to invade Japan twice: 1274 and 1281. Both attempts failed due to Taifuns.

The "Mongol", who reached Hungary was actually Attila the Hun.

Concerning the issue that Napoleon was not able to feed his troops: One must always be aware that at that time the concept of supply lines was not established yet. Ammunition was carried with the army, food was acquired in the area the army was located in. When the Russians did perform the practice of scorched earth and partisan attacks at strategic points plus the increasingly bad weather due to a harsh winter, no food was left and the army of Napoleon diminished even more. One cannot say, that Napoleon was a Noob, because he managed to conquer more of Europe than even Hitler had been capable of with opponents comparably stronger and more determined than the later England and France. Also his tactics and strategies where the base of even modern warfare (war of mobility and circumvention instead of static assault and defense). These principles where actually applied in the American Civil War as well.
True, but that's still a pretty damn big palce to conquer. And his sun Kublai is (rather literally) the father of money.

Attlia the Hun dates back to the time of the Western Roman Empire (so c. 500 AD/CE)

He was a bit off at Waterloo, but there are several reasons why he may have lost.

1. The terrain. It's kinda hard to kill people who are on top of a ridge and almost out of sight

2. His attempt to split the Allies into small, disorganised groups failed, instead they just sat in the centre

3. He failed to tie up any of Wellington's reserves at Hougoumont farm.

4. His cavalry couldn't break the Allies' infantry 'squares'

5. He misused the Imperial Guard. Badly.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
BEE_Grim_Reaper
Member
+15|6928|Germany

Spark wrote:

BEE_Grim_Reaper wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:


yes that was also the problem, if u fight too fast, u lose fast. But the greatest military commander of them all is not from europe... it was ghankis khan, ruled the largest empire ever. Took over china, he failed in japan coz there was a typhoon and destroyed all his ships (4k ships!!!). reached hungary...
Actually, I would like to add some corrections here:

Ghengis Khan (whom you spelt Ghankis Khan) did not really rule the larges empire ever. He did not take over China, he did not try to invade Japan, he did not reach hungary.

Ghengis Khan did reach the North Korean Border and the Kaspian Sea, the Ukraine and some nothern parts of China. He was born in 1155, 1162 or 1167 (historians are not sure) and died 1227.

The Mongolian Khan you are referring to was actually Kublai Khan (born 1215, died 1297). He managed to conquer China, becoming the founder of the imperial Yuan Dynasty. He attempted to invade Japan twice: 1274 and 1281. Both attempts failed due to Taifuns.

The "Mongol", who reached Hungary was actually Attila the Hun.

Concerning the issue that Napoleon was not able to feed his troops: One must always be aware that at that time the concept of supply lines was not established yet. Ammunition was carried with the army, food was acquired in the area the army was located in. When the Russians did perform the practice of scorched earth and partisan attacks at strategic points plus the increasingly bad weather due to a harsh winter, no food was left and the army of Napoleon diminished even more. One cannot say, that Napoleon was a Noob, because he managed to conquer more of Europe than even Hitler had been capable of with opponents comparably stronger and more determined than the later England and France. Also his tactics and strategies where the base of even modern warfare (war of mobility and circumvention instead of static assault and defense). These principles where actually applied in the American Civil War as well.
True, but that's still a pretty damn big palce to conquer. And his sun Kublai is (rather literally) the father of money.

Attlia the Hun dates back to the time of the Western Roman Empire (so c. 500 AD/CE)

He was a bit off at Waterloo, but there are several reasons why he may have lost.

1. The terrain. It's kinda hard to kill people who are on top of a ridge and almost out of sight

2. His attempt to split the Allies into small, disorganised groups failed, instead they just sat in the centre

3. He failed to tie up any of Wellington's reserves at Hougoumont farm.

4. His cavalry couldn't break the Allies' infantry 'squares'

5. He misused the Imperial Guard. Badly.
True... However, Dschingis Khan and Kublai Khan were not related to each other
BEE_Grim_Reaper
Member
+15|6928|Germany

Spark wrote:

BEE_Grim_Reaper wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

yes that was also the problem, if u fight too fast, u lose fast. But the greatest military commander of them all is not from europe... it was ghankis khan, ruled the largest empire ever. Took over china, he failed in japan coz there was a typhoon and destroyed all his ships (4k ships!!!). reached hungary...
Actually, I would like to add some corrections here:

Ghengis Khan (whom you spelt Ghankis Khan) did not really rule the larges empire ever. He did not take over China, he did not try to invade Japan, he did not reach hungary.

Ghengis Khan did reach the North Korean Border and the Kaspian Sea, the Ukraine and some nothern parts of China. He was born in 1155, 1162 or 1167 (historians are not sure) and died 1227.

The Mongolian Khan you are referring to was actually Kublai Khan (born 1215, died 1297). He managed to conquer China, becoming the founder of the imperial Yuan Dynasty. He attempted to invade Japan twice: 1274 and 1281. Both attempts failed due to Taifuns.

The "Mongol", who reached Hungary was actually Attila the Hun.

Concerning the issue that Napoleon was not able to feed his troops: One must always be aware that at that time the concept of supply lines was not established yet. Ammunition was carried with the army, food was acquired in the area the army was located in. When the Russians did perform the practice of scorched earth and partisan attacks at strategic points plus the increasingly bad weather due to a harsh winter, no food was left and the army of Napoleon diminished even more. One cannot say, that Napoleon was a Noob, because he managed to conquer more of Europe than even Hitler had been capable of with opponents comparably stronger and more determined than the later England and France. Also his tactics and strategies where the base of even modern warfare (war of mobility and circumvention instead of static assault and defense). These principles where actually applied in the American Civil War as well.
True, but that's still a pretty damn big palce to conquer. And his sun Kublai is (rather literally) the father of money.

Attlia the Hun dates back to the time of the Western Roman Empire (so c. 500 AD/CE)

He was a bit off at Waterloo, but there are several reasons why he may have lost.

1. The terrain. It's kinda hard to kill people who are on top of a ridge and almost out of sight

2. His attempt to split the Allies into small, disorganised groups failed, instead they just sat in the centre

3. He failed to tie up any of Wellington's reserves at Hougoumont farm.

4. His cavalry couldn't break the Allies' infantry 'squares'

5. He misused the Imperial Guard. Badly.
True... However, Dschingis Khan and Kublai Khan were not related to each other
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6937
we all learned 1 thing in war... NEVER PISS OFF THE RUSSIANS!!! most ppl who fought w/ the russians lost, the nazi's in WW2, napolean etc etc
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6937
we all learned 1 thing in war... NEVER PISS OFF THE RUSSIANS!!! most ppl who fought w/ the russians lost, the nazi's in WW2, napolean etc etc
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6896|Canberra, AUS
enough with the double posting
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7058

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

we all learned 1 thing in war... NEVER PISS OFF THE RUSSIANS!!! most ppl who fought w/ the russians lost, the nazi's in WW2, napolean etc etc
Russia ? You mean the USSR.

The German Army had pushed the USSR out and away from its only winter port,

out of its agricultural base,

away from its petroleum reserves.

and ruined its industrial base,

Despite have delayed the start of the operation 3 months to cover Italy's blunders in Africa.

The USA supplied the USSR with every thing it needed but didn't have through the
" Murmansk Run " and opened their frozen ports with ice breakers, yes others helped.

The USA kept the USSR so well supplied that Anti Tanks guns would routinely fire AP at single German soldiers.

When it came down to it The USSR had the Nazi's beat in every abomination and aberration they committed against humanity. The County sucked and we are all glad its dead. No one mourns the loss of the USSR

Don't fuck with the USSR ? we did . their gone now.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6896|Canberra, AUS
Instead we have Russia which has taken to cutting gas supplies to poor, oil-less, neighbouring countries at the height of winter (Georgia, Ukraine).

--

Here's a laugh, and this made me appreciate what was said numerous times about France's fallability in war.

WWII

France is the Allies' major ally (no pun intended) on the European mailand.

The French build a huge line of defensive bunkers to defend against the inevitable German advance.

Problem?

They're all facing the wrong way!!!!

Last edited by Spark (2006-01-25 01:25:12)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6937

Horseman 77 wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

we all learned 1 thing in war... NEVER PISS OFF THE RUSSIANS!!! most ppl who fought w/ the russians lost, the nazi's in WW2, napolean etc etc
Russia ? You mean the USSR.

The German Army had pushed the USSR out and away from its only winter port,

out of its agricultural base,

away from its petroleum reserves.

and ruined its industrial base,

Despite have delayed the start of the operation 3 months to cover Italy's blunders in Africa.

The USA supplied the USSR with every thing it needed but didn't have through the
" Murmansk Run " and opened their frozen ports with ice breakers, yes others helped.

The USA kept the USSR so well supplied that Anti Tanks guns would routinely fire AP at single German soldiers.

When it came down to it The USSR had the Nazi's beat in every abomination and aberration they committed against humanity. The County sucked and we are all glad its dead. No one mourns the loss of the USSR

Don't fuck with the USSR ? we did . their gone now.
same geographical location, but the russians still pushed forwards and they produced the most planes in ww2 (yaks) and even their women were in the war. the cold war was not a military one, it was more of a economical one, the USSR spent too much money on their military then ppl become homeless, and no money= no tax= ur gov is fucked.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Rosse_modest
Member
+76|6997|Antwerp, Flanders

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Rosse_modest wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

napoleon was a n00b, didnt give enough food for his man.

most countries in the world do sell their weapons to dangerouse states, i have to admit that 1 moronic taiwanese commander sold our Night vision goggles which were given for free from the US, he sold it to the enemy (china) and that is kinda retarded
Since when didn't he give enough food to his men?
He was probably one of the greatest military commanders to ever walk the face of this planet. His only weakness was he was a little too eager to take on everyone at the same time.
yes that was also the problem, if u fight too fast, u lose fast. But the greatest military commander of them all is not from europe... it was ghankis khan, ruled the largest empire ever. Took over china, he failed in japan coz there was a typhoon and destroyed all his ships (4k ships!!!). reached hungary...
On a side note: I wasn't contesting the skills of the Khans, I said Napoleon was ONE of the greatest, not THE greatest.
(HUN)Rudebwoy
Member
+45|6976
Attila was not a mongolian.
Attila the Hun was a hun.:)really! And he lived: 406-452 AD
That's where we HUNgarians originate from.We came from up north-east (somewhere around the Ural mountain).
We settled down in the Carpathian Basin around 895 AD when the seven tribes' leaders founded Hungary, in 1000AD we had our  first christian king. In 1240-42 the mongolian hordes reached us and almost wiped us the f*ck out.Our king had to flee to the Adriatic Sea. Just in one year of the mongol attacks 1/3 of the population have died.
That's all for the history lesson about mongolians and hungarians.
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7058

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

we all learned 1 thing in war... NEVER PISS OFF THE RUSSIANS!!! most ppl who fought w/ the russians lost, the nazi's in WW2, napolean etc etc
Russia ? You mean the USSR.

The German Army had pushed the USSR out and away from its only winter port,

out of its agricultural base,

away from its petroleum reserves.

and ruined its industrial base,

Despite have delayed the start of the operation 3 months to cover Italy's blunders in Africa.

The USA supplied the USSR with every thing it needed but didn't have through the
" Murmansk Run " and opened their frozen ports with ice breakers, yes others helped.

The USA kept the USSR so well supplied that Anti Tanks guns would routinely fire AP at single German soldiers.

When it came down to it The USSR had the Nazi's beat in every abomination and aberration they committed against humanity. The County sucked and we are all glad its dead. No one mourns the loss of the USSR

Don't fuck with the USSR ? we did . their gone now.
same geographical location, but the russians still pushed forwards and Raped on an unprecedented scale, there was actually a baby boom in Europe ( Austria for example do to rapes ) and they produced the most planes in ww2 (yaks) and even their women were in the war. the cold war was not a military one, it was more of a economical one, the USSR spent too much money on their military then ppl become homeless, and no money= no tax= ur gov is fucked.
Russian planes in WWII were about 3 years lagging in Technology so they substituted with Numbers, A viable strategy in my book, Like The US Sherman Tank. Technically inferior numerically superior.  During the Cold war they were 20 years behind technologically. There equipment was so poor many US intelligence people thought it was some kind of Ruse to lull us, It wasn't it just sucked. We had Equipment captured at the VTRANG 150 ATC. It would have been ok for WWII it was sadly out classed for modern combat though.

Now there is no point in the USA producing top of the line cutting edge stuff, so we produce quality 2nd line technology for the most part. Our Smart Bombs went from pin point precision ( down the chimney ) in 92 to GPS guidance ( in the front yard ) in 2004

PS House still missing.
SSgt_Mo
Member
+0|6901
Joke I saw a while ago on the Late Night Show....after Bush stated he was unaware that the CIA intel wasn't as sound as he was lead to believe.  (about Weapons of Mass destruction)

Late show Host asks:  So....even with the news about the misleading CIA intel, how can Bush state he was absolutely sure Sudam had Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Analyst Replies:  His daddy showed him the receipts!!!
(HUN)Rudebwoy
Member
+45|6976
well, then it is ironic that in the beginning of the iraqi war, two squads were almost fully destroyed when they asked for air support and the bombs landed on them...

edit:this goes for the last comment of horseman77

Last edited by (HUN)Rudebwoy (2006-01-25 12:02:03)

cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6917|NJ

atlvolunteer wrote:

Big freakin' deal.  He did drugs 35 years ago.  Who wasn't doing drugs in the early 70s?
When Clinton was president it was a huge fucking deal that he May have smoke Pot once, limited pot use doesn't put holes in your brain like cocaine does.  Maybe that's why Bush has God speak to him.

I hope you were kidding with this
atlvolunteer
PKMMMMMMMMMM
+27|6992|Atlanta, GA USA

cpt.fass1 wrote:

atlvolunteer wrote:

Big freakin' deal.  He did drugs 35 years ago.  Who wasn't doing drugs in the early 70s?
When Clinton was president it was a huge fucking deal that he May have smoke Pot once, limited pot use doesn't put holes in your brain like cocaine does.  Maybe that's why Bush has God speak to him.

I hope you were kidding with this
I wasn't.  I also was not one of the people who bashed Clinton for smoking pot, although I thought it a bit stupid to say he didn't inhale.  Lots of people did drugs in their younger years.  IMO its not any worse than the alcohol abuse that goes on when people are that age.
jarhedch
Member
+12|6891|Aberdeen, Uk, SF Bay Area 1st
the thing about the clinton pot issue for me wasn't the whole whether he inhaled or not, it was the fact he didn't respect my intelligence enough to play it straight with me, and expect me to beleive that he really didn't inhale. I mean, c'mon, if you don't respect me enough to be straight with me about that, then how can we expect him to be honest with us about anything else? I used to be a real Clinton hater, still don't like the guy, but used to really hate him, especially regarding his foreign affairs, but after seeing what a tight rope he was walking especially regarding Al Qaeda, i realize more now what he was trying to do, and i understand why he did what he did. OH, and regarding WMD, here's what has been found:

http://www.usembassy-dhaka.org/state/St … 08_04.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 00530.html
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c … DT0516.DTL (who said the poles were a useless military force? oh yeah, Michael Moore!)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle … 872201.stm
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html

so don't tell me that no WMDs were found, and dont tell me that a war is illegal or legal, that's just a farce to make squeamish people feel better about sending in people to die for them. War is nasty, dirty and messy. I'm not a Bush fan, in fact i am not happy with his domestic policies at all, but i voted for him, am proud i did, because i was part of the "anybody but Kerry" camp. The Iraq war had reasons, not only for WMDs, if anyone with a sense of truth would find if they look back to the speeches and rhetoric coming out of the white house before the war even started, it was one fo the reason, and the biggest reason we went to the UN, but not the only. Rant over
BEE_Grim_Reaper
Member
+15|6928|Germany

Horseman 77 wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:


Russia ? You mean the USSR.

The German Army had pushed the USSR out and away from its only winter port,

out of its agricultural base,

away from its petroleum reserves.

and ruined its industrial base,

Despite have delayed the start of the operation 3 months to cover Italy's blunders in Africa.

The USA supplied the USSR with every thing it needed but didn't have through the
" Murmansk Run " and opened their frozen ports with ice breakers, yes others helped.

The USA kept the USSR so well supplied that Anti Tanks guns would routinely fire AP at single German soldiers.

When it came down to it The USSR had the Nazi's beat in every abomination and aberration they committed against humanity. The County sucked and we are all glad its dead. No one mourns the loss of the USSR

Don't fuck with the USSR ? we did . their gone now.
same geographical location, but the russians still pushed forwards and Raped on an unprecedented scale, there was actually a baby boom in Europe ( Austria for example do to rapes ) and they produced the most planes in ww2 (yaks) and even their women were in the war. the cold war was not a military one, it was more of a economical one, the USSR spent too much money on their military then ppl become homeless, and no money= no tax= ur gov is fucked.
Russian planes in WWII were about 3 years lagging in Technology so they substituted with Numbers, A viable strategy in my book, Like The US Sherman Tank. Technically inferior numerically superior.  During the Cold war they were 20 years behind technologically. There equipment was so poor many US intelligence people thought it was some kind of Ruse to lull us, It wasn't it just sucked. We had Equipment captured at the VTRANG 150 ATC. It would have been ok for WWII it was sadly out classed for modern combat though.

Now there is no point in the USA producing top of the line cutting edge stuff, so we produce quality 2nd line technology for the most part. Our Smart Bombs went from pin point precision ( down the chimney ) in 92 to GPS guidance ( in the front yard ) in 2004

PS House still missing.
Horseman, I have no idea, where you got your attitude from, but frankly, you should have paid more attention in school... especially history and political science.

The Germans managed to capture Odessa but that port was totally unsuited for supply convoys. All other ports (Murmansk, Leningrad and Archangelsk) were open.

The Germans never managed to capture the agricultural base of the USSR since that is located in Kasachstan...

The Germans tried but never managed to capture the Russian oilsupply located at the Caspian Sea (the area around Baku).

The Russians moved their industrial base behind the Ural to Sibiria... so actually the Germans did not reach any of those either.

Since you mention Africa... might I remind you, that Operation Barbarossa (Attack on the USSR) started on June 22nd 1941. The german military operation in Africa started February 1941 but not this was the reason for a slight delay (actually 4 Weeks, not 3 months) but it was the invasion of Yugoslavia.

Concerning the "inferiority" of Russian Technology: The M4 Sherman Tank of the US was by far the most produced Tank in WW2, however it was neither the most advanced or the most powerful one. Realistic estimates of the allied High Command say, that 5 M4 Sherman where neccessary to defeat on German Panther or Tiger Tank. The Panther Tank was actually developed in response to the Russian T-34 as it posed a serious threat to earlier models. Go figure....

Also: The Russians developed a ground attack plane, that was considered a serious threat by the Germans: the IL-2 Sturmovik... the first plane that could really be called ground attack plane. That thing was heavily armored (German Fighters had to use 20mm and 30mm cannons to down them as the 7.92mm and 12.7mm MG could not penetrate the armor and even hits of a 20mm cannon could be survived), heavily armed (2 7.62 MG which had a remarkably high fire-rate, 2 cannons of either 20mm, 23mm or 37mm, 600 kg bombload and between 8 and 16 unguided rockets) and quite maneuvrable for its size. Actually, the concept of the IL-2 is the basis of the nowadays A-10

Actually the help of the US to the USSR (apart from the help of the UK) was not quite without a hitch. First of all: all US planes supplied to the USSR via lend-lease (yup, Russia had to pay) where second line and obsolet (like the P-40 Warhawk and the P-38 Airacobra). Actually, Russian planes in WW2 where quite up to modern technological standards... however the USSR tended to build their equipment more sturdier and simpler as the western counterparts... which is a design-philosophy they stuck to.

You say, that russian technology was 20 years behind? Get real... they might have built their planes computers not with microelectronic chips but that made the electronic systems easier to maintain and interestingly enough more resistant to EMP. Also.... the T-72 and T-80 tank is superior to the M1A2 in many things...

US war equipment is suited mostly for good weather in a moderate climate... Russian equipment is suited for sand and heat of a desert or the cold weather and snow of arctic climate.

On a side note: US do not use laser guided "smart" bombs (since when are bombs smart anyway?) but GPS guided because they could not afford to bring in SEAL Teams or Force Recon to paint the Target with a laser. US tends more and more to conducting armchair-wars.

Concerning atrocities in WW2. Yes, Russia has committed many, but not nearly as many as Germany, I can tell you that. Russia did not gas humans by the millions, they did not fill nearly as many massgraves with shot POW's or Partisans as Germany did.

But as a matter of fact... the US committed atrocities in WW2 as well... like interning nearly all citizens which where of Japanese origin in internment camps under inhumane conditions... by the definition, these camps also qualify as concentration camps (in the technical term). Also it is known that US submarines in the last months of the war attacked any ship with an asiatic looking crew and sunk it (even fisherboats) regardless wether the crew was japanese, malayan, phillipin, chinese, indonesian... just because they were bored and had no targets anymore.

So... before you throw you disregard towards others, be sure that you have a clean slate... and remember: without German technological advancement (wire guided anti-tank missiles, Rocketry, Tank improvement and aviation technology), the US technology would not have been as advanced as it is now, since they stole it as spoils of victory after the war...
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6896|Canberra, AUS

BEE_Grim_Reaper wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:


same geographical location, but the russians still pushed forwards and Raped on an unprecedented scale, there was actually a baby boom in Europe ( Austria for example do to rapes ) and they produced the most planes in ww2 (yaks) and even their women were in the war. the cold war was not a military one, it was more of a economical one, the USSR spent too much money on their military then ppl become homeless, and no money= no tax= ur gov is fucked.
Russian planes in WWII were about 3 years lagging in Technology so they substituted with Numbers, A viable strategy in my book, Like The US Sherman Tank. Technically inferior numerically superior.  During the Cold war they were 20 years behind technologically. There equipment was so poor many US intelligence people thought it was some kind of Ruse to lull us, It wasn't it just sucked. We had Equipment captured at the VTRANG 150 ATC. It would have been ok for WWII it was sadly out classed for modern combat though.

Now there is no point in the USA producing top of the line cutting edge stuff, so we produce quality 2nd line technology for the most part. Our Smart Bombs went from pin point precision ( down the chimney ) in 92 to GPS guidance ( in the front yard ) in 2004

PS House still missing.
Horseman, I have no idea, where you got your attitude from, but frankly, you should have paid more attention in school... especially history and political science.

The Germans managed to capture Odessa but that port was totally unsuited for supply convoys. All other ports (Murmansk, Leningrad and Archangelsk) were open.

The Germans never managed to capture the agricultural base of the USSR since that is located in Kasachstan...

The Germans tried but never managed to capture the Russian oilsupply located at the Caspian Sea (the area around Baku).

The Russians moved their industrial base behind the Ural to Sibiria... so actually the Germans did not reach any of those either.

Since you mention Africa... might I remind you, that Operation Barbarossa (Attack on the USSR) started on June 22nd 1941. The german military operation in Africa started February 1941 but not this was the reason for a slight delay (actually 4 Weeks, not 3 months) but it was the invasion of Yugoslavia.

Concerning the "inferiority" of Russian Technology: The M4 Sherman Tank of the US was by far the most produced Tank in WW2, however it was neither the most advanced or the most powerful one. Realistic estimates of the allied High Command say, that 5 M4 Sherman where neccessary to defeat on German Panther or Tiger Tank. The Panther Tank was actually developed in response to the Russian T-34 as it posed a serious threat to earlier models. Go figure....

Also: The Russians developed a ground attack plane, that was considered a serious threat by the Germans: the IL-2 Sturmovik... the first plane that could really be called ground attack plane. That thing was heavily armored (German Fighters had to use 20mm and 30mm cannons to down them as the 7.92mm and 12.7mm MG could not penetrate the armor and even hits of a 20mm cannon could be survived), heavily armed (2 7.62 MG which had a remarkably high fire-rate, 2 cannons of either 20mm, 23mm or 37mm, 600 kg bombload and between 8 and 16 unguided rockets) and quite maneuvrable for its size. Actually, the concept of the IL-2 is the basis of the nowadays A-10

Actually the help of the US to the USSR (apart from the help of the UK) was not quite without a hitch. First of all: all US planes supplied to the USSR via lend-lease (yup, Russia had to pay) where second line and obsolet (like the P-40 Warhawk and the P-38 Airacobra). Actually, Russian planes in WW2 where quite up to modern technological standards... however the USSR tended to build their equipment more sturdier and simpler as the western counterparts... which is a design-philosophy they stuck to.

You say, that russian technology was 20 years behind? Get real... they might have built their planes computers not with microelectronic chips but that made the electronic systems easier to maintain and interestingly enough more resistant to EMP. Also.... the T-72 and T-80 tank is superior to the M1A2 in many things...

US war equipment is suited mostly for good weather in a moderate climate... Russian equipment is suited for sand and heat of a desert or the cold weather and snow of arctic climate.

On a side note: US do not use laser guided "smart" bombs (since when are bombs smart anyway?) but GPS guided because they could not afford to bring in SEAL Teams or Force Recon to paint the Target with a laser. US tends more and more to conducting armchair-wars.

Concerning atrocities in WW2. Yes, Russia has committed many, but not nearly as many as Germany, I can tell you that. Russia did not gas humans by the millions, they did not fill nearly as many massgraves with shot POW's or Partisans as Germany did.

But as a matter of fact... the US committed atrocities in WW2 as well... like interning nearly all citizens which where of Japanese origin in internment camps under inhumane conditions... by the definition, these camps also qualify as concentration camps (in the technical term). Also it is known that US submarines in the last months of the war attacked any ship with an asiatic looking crew and sunk it (even fisherboats) regardless wether the crew was japanese, malayan, phillipin, chinese, indonesian... just because they were bored and had no targets anymore.

So... before you throw you disregard towards others, be sure that you have a clean slate... and remember: without German technological advancement (wire guided anti-tank missiles, Rocketry, Tank improvement and aviation technology), the US technology would not have been as advanced as it is now, since they stole it as spoils of victory after the war...
1. I Think you mean 'Panzer', which (I believe) is a literal translation of 'tank'.

2. Concerning 'smart bombs'. Names can be decieving, as they aren't that 'smart' after all. These 'smart bombs' have the inconvenient and annoying habit of missing their targets completely. Instead they have an odd tendency to obliterate nearby civilians. Sometimes these things are so un-'smart' that they don't even hit the COUNTRY they were aiming for :S.

3. Concerning Russia. No-one, I repeat, NO-ONE in modern history has defeated Russia through Military force. Two reasons

             3.1. The Climate. To get in to the Russian heartland, you have to go through some of the most inhospitable places on the planet (that are inhabited).

             3.2. The sheer tenacity of the Russians. Why did the Russians push back the Germans on the Eastern Front? They were far more ruthless and determined than the Germans (although the climate helped)

The reason the Americans won the Cold War was because they got the Russians locked into an INSANE arms race. Within a few decades, the Russians had built an arsenal of 30000+ nukes, while the US was sitting pretty on about 24000. The Russians, starved and in economic turmoil because of this, lost. (The US people didn't starve because the US produces a massive amounht of the world's food).

One more thing about WWII. Isn't it interesting to note that the USSR was, at the time, a VERY similar state to Germany?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7058
Horseman, I have no idea, where you got your attitude from,

Horseman Responds.. Sorry I don't know how to make the Quote boxes every one does, attitude ? ?? Didn't know I had attitude. I thought the USSR tried hard to Capture all it could, Had to put a wall up to keep its citizens in, Shot them if they tried to escape Etc. ? no?  please enlighten me.

REAPER Says paid more attention in school.. especially history and political science.

Horseman Responds.. They didn't teach us this in school You had to want to read on your own, Our school was touchy feely "it was so Sad and Everyone was Wrong" ACLU crap etc.

REAPER Says... The Germans managed to capture Odessa but that port was totally unsuited for supply convoys. All other ports (Murmansk, Leningrad and Archangelsk) were open.

Horseman Responds..Yes Thanks to US Navy I didn't say Germans had good ports I said USSR had none without our help. Correct ?

REAPER Says...The Germans never managed to capture the agricultural base of the USSR since that is located in Kasachstan...

Horseman Responds.. Why did so many starve to death then?  eating putrid horse meat etc. Clue me in.?

REAPER Says...The Germans tried but never managed to capture the Russian oilsupply located at the Caspian Sea (the area around Baku).


Horseman Responds.. I thought the  where the Lions share of Oil fields production and refinement was in Germany's hands ? no ?.

REAPER Says...The Russians moved their industrial base behind the Ural to Sibiria... so actually the Germans did not reach any of those either.

Horseman Responds.. moved their industrial base Really. Moved a Geographical location. hmm Why didn't they move their Borders too.

REAPER Says...Since you mention Africa... might I remind you, that Operation Barbarossa (Attack on the USSR) started on June 22nd 1941. The german military operation in Africa started February 1941 but not this was the reason for a slight delay (actually 4 Weeks, not 3 months) but it was the invasion of Yugoslavia.

Horseman Responds.. News to me.

REAPER Says...Concerning the "inferiority" of Russian Technology: The M4 Sherman Tank of the US was by far the most produced Tank in WW2, however it was neither the most advanced or the most powerful one. Realistic estimates of the allied High Command say, that 5 M4 Sherman where neccessary to defeat on German Panther or Tiger Tank. The Panther Tank was actually developed in response to the Russian T-34 as it posed a serious threat to earlier models. Go figure....

Horseman Responds.. This was exactly my point. Clearly you didn't read what I said.

REAPER Says...Also: The Russians developed a ground attack plane, that was considered a serious threat by the Germans: the IL-2 Sturmovik... the first plane that could really be called ground attack plane. That thing was heavily armored (German Fighters had to use 20mm and 30mm cannons to down them as the 7.92mm and 12.7mm MG could not penetrate the armor and even hits of a 20mm cannon could be survived), heavily armed (2 7.62 MG which had a remarkably high fire-rate, 2 cannons of either 20mm, 23mm or 37mm, 600 kg bombload and between 8 and 16 unguided rockets) and quite maneuvrable for its size. Actually, the concept of the IL-2 is the basis of the nowadays A-10


Horseman Responds..Good plane Ahead of its time, well into the late 50s. its use was Dramatically improved do to the Terrain where it was employed. It was Ideal for the Eastern Front It would have been good in North Africa to I think. It was a Great Idea I agree.

REAPER Says...Actually the help of the US to the USSR (apart from the help of the UK) was not quite without a hitch. First of all: all US planes supplied to the USSR via lend-lease (yup, Russia had to pay)  ( So Big Deal ! ) where second line and obsolet (like the P-40 Warhawk and the P-38 Airacobra).

Horseman Responds..These planes "Became obsolete " when the war started they were at or near 1st line. The Air Cobra was an Excellent Aircraft hampered by a slightly under powered engine it did better in The Denser air of the Pacific theatre as did the P38 which was near useless in Europe But Ruled in the South Pacific. I don't understand the Aerodynamic principles but that's what I read. The Engines it was designed around were instead employed in P51 production. It was a good plane. Better than any they gave us.

REAPER Says...Actually, Russian planes in WW2 where quite up to modern technological standards... however the USSR tended to build their equipment more sturdier and simpler as the western counterparts... which is a design-philosophy they stuck to.

Horseman Responds..Just you opinion here. Not shared in anything I ever read.

REAPER Says...You say, that russian technology was 20 years behind? Get real... they might have built their planes computers not with microelectronic chips but that made the electronic systems easier to maintain and interestingly enough more resistant to EMP*. Also.... the T-72 and T-80 tank is superior to the M1A2 in many things...

Horseman Responds..Really... Really. ? Here I must take exception. This deserves its own Post. Its just not true.

* he means it used tube not transistor technology.

REAPER Says...US war equipment is suited mostly for good weather in a moderate climate... Russian equipment is suited for sand and heat of a desert or the cold weather and snow of arctic climate.

Horseman Responds..I will not argue USSR design parameters but it is still inferior.

REAPER Says...On a side note: US do not use laser guided "smart" bombs (since when are bombs smart anyway?)

Horseman Responds.. Its the Excepted generic term as opposed to unguided Dumb bombs. your wasting space here

REAPER Says....but GPS guided because they could not afford to bring in SEAL Teams or Force Recon to paint the Target with a laser. US tends more and more to conducting armchair-wars.

Horseman Responds..Explain this. I mean I think I know what your saying but please for all Expand on this .

REAPER Says...Concerning atrocities in WW2. Yes, Russia has committed many, but not nearly as many as Germany, I can tell you that. Russia did not gas humans by the millions, they did not fill nearly as many massgraves with shot POW's or Partisans as Germany did.

Horseman Responds..Yes they did and all the newly released documentation backs it in fact we can lower Germanys' Score because everything the USSR did had been attributed to them previously even by our government. And they still fall behind Japan. New data gives Germany 3 rd place during that Era. China has 1st place for atrocities and mass murder of civilians currently.  look it up

REAPER Says...But as a matter of fact... the US committed atrocities in WW2 as well... like interning nearly all citizens which where of Japanese origin in internment camps under inhumane conditions...

Horseman Responds..Big deal.. were there gas chambers ?  Basically we were mean to them. little else considering everything else happening at the time it pales. Get Real,

REAPER Says... by the definition, these camps also qualify as concentration camps (in the technical term). Also it is known that US submarines in the last months of the war attacked any ship with an asiatic looking crew and sunk it (even fisherboats) regardless wether the crew was japanese, malayan, phillipin, chinese, indonesian...

Horseman Responds..You mean we hampered the Food production in a time of all out war?  what a concept.

REAPER Says...just because they were bored and had no targets anymore.


Horseman Responds..Thin ice here... Prove it.

REAPER Says...So... before you throw you disregard towards others, be sure that you have a clean slate...

Horseman Responds..What others ? The USSR doesn't exist anymore !

REAPER Says...and remember: without German technological advancement (wire guided anti-tank missiles, Rocketry, Tank improvement and aviation technology), the US technology would not have been as advanced as it is now, since they stole it as spoils of victory after the war...

Horseman Responds..Agreed but we didn't have to Try too hard, most well placed Germans were trying hard to be captured by The USA or GB. Why is that? please explain that ? I mean we where committing all these atrocities and they are like please take me too. You have to explain this.

You did quote a ton of stuff I never even heard of before. Do you have a (Short reading list) you could post I prefer to read books from other perspectives. It really helps TY for your time and effort.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6896|Canberra, AUS
The US, though, in the Cold War, turned on some unusual people.

I cannot remember who, but in a documentary about US spying in the air during the Cold War, one of the chiefs of thier operation was a former Nazi leader, and I think SS chief.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7058

Spark wrote:

The US, though, in the Cold War, turned on some unusual people.

I cannot remember who, but in a documentary about US spying in the air during the Cold War, one of the chiefs of thier operation was a former Nazi leader, and I think SS chief.
Hey WWII was over. for a cool book Read " Blind Mans Bluff " a true story of the Stuff that went on back then and how.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard