Now I see fairies groping a pretty hawt lady!!!DonFck wrote:
I may have given a short warning but the image owner was online and PM:d so..Entertayner wrote:
It has now been 11 minutes since Donny warned so no. 7 has been disqualified.
Edit: No wasted votes, I've edited and reposted the sig
Edit 2: I received a new sig from the image owner, reposted and back in business
Poll
BF2s SotW #6
| 1 | 12% | 12% - 13 | ||||
| 2 | 3% | 3% - 4 | ||||
| 3 | 5% | 5% - 6 | ||||
| 4 | 12% | 12% - 13 | ||||
| 5 | 4% | 4% - 5 | ||||
| 6 | 12% | 12% - 13 | ||||
| 7 | 24% | 24% - 26 | ||||
| 8 | 12% | 12% - 13 | ||||
| 9 | 7% | 7% - 8 | ||||
| 10 | 6% | 6% - 7 | ||||
| Total: 108 | ||||||
Wow.. What a way to end a page..Zimmer wrote:
None. They all fail.
The ones that are good graphically have an attrocious image of a woman ( or a man, they're so ugly ).
And the ones that have good women are shit graphically.
I nulled.
Ugly SOTW ftw.
Well, can't blame you for not speaking your mind, Hansie! <-- Bad Hans Zimmer reference.
I need around tree fiddy.
Yea they sucks xD... I voted for number 8 though, but I can't see shit anyway...
LOL never happy. meh amateurs!!Zimmer wrote:
None. They all fail.
The ones that are good graphically have an attrocious image of a woman ( or a man, they're so ugly ).
And the ones that have good women are shit graphically.
I nulled.
Ugly SOTW ftw.
4
No one in this forum would turn down any of those women tbh...Zimmer wrote:
None. They all fail.
The ones that are good graphically have an attrocious image of a woman ( or a man, they're so ugly ).
Last edited by justice (2007-05-15 13:16:11)
I know fucking karate
well, i was gonna say something similar only a little nicer.Zimmer wrote:
None. They all fail.
The ones that are good graphically have an attrocious image of a woman ( or a man, they're so ugly ).
And the ones that have good women are shit graphically.
I nulled.
Ugly SOTW ftw.
the ones that are done well do have some ugly women in them, like number one (no offense of course). im tempted to vote 6 just for the humor in it but i really like the color in number 4...
er...im a 15 yr old kid and i didnt even notice the things the other guys noticed. Why is there this stereotypical view that all teenagers whine on games and scour the internet in search of a naked lady......however, when i did look closer, i didnt think they were pubes, it just looked like shadow to me...but whatever.Z-trooper wrote:
lol, its so typical that no 7 has gotten most votes so far, teenagers sitting there in their dark rooms sweating cause they might see a nipple if they are lucky
Number 1 for me
-konfusion
-konfusion
Is it me or does number 7 say "BF2's"... as in "Bee eff toose". Fail.
Still, I vote number seven. I like the light effects.
Still, I vote number seven. I like the light effects.
No.6, the rest suck, not sexy enough, sorry
#10 Jessica!! oh mama!!
Haha, I missed out again. Next time fo' sho!
4 ... 7 is crap, don't know why you guys are voting for it.
Why is everyone voting for 7? Oooo she's naked, so what? She is wearing way too much makeup.
2
I think they're voting for it because it "stands out" with that ugly-looking torn-out effect.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
Why is everyone voting for 7? Oooo she's naked, so what? She is wearing way too much makeup.
BTW vote for the sig quality, not the girl
Who really quints to see that?DonFck wrote:
No.7 is riding the line on being inappropriate. Actually, it can be regarded as inappropriate. There's a nipple and pubes.
Really, all I see is a white blur.
She must Armor All her tits and pussy
Last edited by Ryan (2007-05-15 16:43:33)
6
I would like to bring it to your attention, 9 is a rip.
Eveidence
So i feel that should be disqualified to. The only change is some text, the rest is some one else's work.
Eveidence
So i feel that should be disqualified to. The only change is some text, the rest is some one else's work.
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
I knew I'd seen that elsewhere, damn... I'll wait to see what the maker has to say for themselves.
a rip-off or did they just do the tutorial? can we really call it a rip-off if thats the case? you said yourself that this is to help people learn and figure things out.
I done the tutorial, but made my own work and completely different. To me it looks like all they have done is downloaded the psd file and hidden some layers and added some text.
To me the finished product looks like an exact copy with just a few layers hidden, imo this is not fair to the other entries.
But lets wait and see what they have to say.
To me the finished product looks like an exact copy with just a few layers hidden, imo this is not fair to the other entries.
But lets wait and see what they have to say.
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
i was just saying, i mean, i really dont care one way or another, its not going to win.
True, i think either you or Konfusion will win.... lol....
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?