BF2s Sig Battles I - Signature 17 VS Signature 5

Pages: 1

Topic closed

Index »
Community »
Everything Else »
Polls »
BF2s Sig Battles I - Signature 17 VS Signature 5

Poll

BF2s Sig Battles I - Signature 17 VS Signature 5

Signature 17	35%	35% - 27
Signature 5	64%	64% - 49
Total: 76

2007-04-02 09:29:59

^*AlphA*^: F*ckers; +3,135|7043|The Hague, Netherlands

Because I might not make it at 21:00 CET, I'm starting these 2 polls now (18:30)

https://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w261/BF2sSigs/untitled11tf1copy.png

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Signature 17

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Signature 5

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w261/BF2sSigs/Untitled-144copy.png

VOTE FOR YOUR FAVORITE

- BF2s Sig Contest -

https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png

2007-04-02 09:32:37

Raphi: Banned; +354|6563|Basel, Switzerland

Hmm... hard to say... Signature 5 gets my vote. It's difficult to read the name on the sig but it's good made. The blue-gray art wins.

2007-04-02 09:33:56

XIII-twozerosniper: Member; +0|6550

17 Ftw

2007-04-02 09:35:23

acEofspadEs6313: Shiny! Let's be bad guys.; +102|6997|NAS Jacksonville, Florida

2007-04-02 09:44:41

DonFck: Hibernator; +3,227|6936|Finland

Sig 5.

The text could be more visible, though.

I need around tree fiddy.

2007-04-02 09:53:50

King_County_Downy: shitfaced; +2,791|6902|Seattle

Boobies!!!!!

Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it

2007-04-02 10:07:51

^*AlphA*^: F*ckers; +3,135|7043|The Hague, Netherlands

Keep the votes coming

2007-04-02 10:09:26

l41e: Member; +677|6953

2007-04-02 10:25:04

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6768|cuntshitlake

number 5, I don't like half-naked women in sigs, they are there just to collect karma.

also the 5 is maybe pretty small, but looks kewl

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2007-04-02 10:33:14

(T)eflon(S)hadow: R.I.P. Neda; +456|7134|Grapevine, TX

XIII-twozerosniper wrote:
17 Ftw

Love the boobs, but take off the BF2 logo, we know where Wake Ilse is...

2007-04-02 10:34:06

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6935|Washington, DC

DeathUnlimited wrote:
number 5, I don't like half-naked women in sigs, they are there just to collect karma.

also the 5 is maybe pretty small, but looks kewl

Agreed. Also, Number 17 is just uninspiring.

2007-04-02 10:38:58

Mike<Eagle23>: BF2sEU old school admin - I don't care who you are; +359|7033|Germany

I really like 5, if this was the sig rating thread it would get a 9.5, however, now it get my vote

2007-04-02 11:46:45

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6834|Global Command

Hurricane wrote:
DeathUnlimited wrote:
number 5, I don't like half-naked women in sigs, they are there just to collect karma.

also the 5 is maybe pretty small, but looks kewl
Agreed. Also, Number 17 is just uninspiring.

Inspired me to rub one out.

2007-04-02 11:49:43

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6768|cuntshitlake

ATG wrote:
Hurricane wrote:
DeathUnlimited wrote:
number 5, I don't like half-naked women in sigs, they are there just to collect karma.

also the 5 is maybe pretty small, but looks kewl
Agreed. Also, Number 17 is just uninspiring.
Inspired me to rub one out.

Yeah, very good pr0n..

not.

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2007-04-02 12:36:54

konfusion: mostly afk; +480|6855|CH/BR - in UK

Sig 5 is very elegant and sleek. gmv

-konfusion

2007-04-02 13:04:32

OmniDeath: ~; +726|6949

5. easy call here.

2007-04-02 15:16:57

Ryan: Member; +1,230|7148|Alberta, Canada

Signature 5. It has more effects in it. Looks more like a signature.

2007-04-02 15:20:24

LT.Victim: Member; +1,175|6867|British Columbia, Canada

As much as I love Wake Island, That Sig could have been done with Microsoft Paint.. So I voted for 5.

2007-04-02 16:39:53

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6834|Global Command

I dunno.
Paint doesn't have the nifty warp brush he used.

Plus, she is so hot _{wack wack wack}

2007-04-02 16:57:36

OmniDeath: ~; +726|6949

ATG wrote:
I dunno.
Paint doesn't have the nifty warp brush he used.

Plus, she is so hot _{wack wack wack}

those effects hardly show, besides he could have found the picture like that.

looks like cougar was right...

2007-04-03 04:58:30

^*AlphA*^: F*ckers; +3,135|7043|The Hague, Netherlands

Giving the polls a bit of life again !

2007-04-03 09:30:22

^*AlphA*^: F*ckers; +3,135|7043|The Hague, Netherlands

BF2s Sig Battles I - Signature 17 VS Signature 5

Signature 17 35% 35% - 27
Signature 5 64% 64% - 49

Topic closed

Pages: 1

Index »
Community »
Everything Else »
Polls »
BF2s Sig Battles I - Signature 17 VS Signature 5

Board footer

Jump to

BF2S Forums BF2s Sig Battles I - Signature 17 VS Signature 5

Poll

XIII-twozerosniper wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Hurricane wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

ATG wrote:

Hurricane wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

ATG wrote:

Board footer