k. Every citizen is a police to another citizen.surgeon_bond wrote:
you said claim anything and ill prove it wrong, prove him wrong !DeathUnlimited wrote:
I can't say anything to that, because I don't know youRaniak wrote:
I'm not a police
yesDeathUnlimited wrote:
k. Every citizen is a police to another citizen.surgeon_bond wrote:
you said claim anything and ill prove it wrong, prove him wrong !DeathUnlimited wrote:
I can't say anything to that, because I don't know you
happy?
In fact: Yeast eEF2 is also shown to bind adenylic nucleotides, which can be displaced by sordarin, suggesting that ADP or ATP also bind to the three C-terminal domains of eEF2voodoodolphins wrote:
what about the statement: Sordarin inhibits ATP binding of eEF2 by inducing conformational changes
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-02-18 05:55:27)
Yes you can if you use an instrument to hold your air supplyVaregg wrote:
Prove this wrong !
You cant kill yourself by holding your breath !
Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
BF2 has glitches.
Two answers aren't enough for you?Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
BF2 has glitches.
I said X is not "either X or not X"bennisboy wrote:
You didnt prove that X is either X or not X was wrong.
You said X=X which is X is X, so you failed a long time ago
Last edited by bennisboy (2007-02-18 06:27:51)
This one is true, no doubt.Djbrown wrote:
Myspace is full of emos
No the don't. they have too many customers to have a good customer support.Djbrown wrote:
Sony has great customer support
No it's not. red is only the wave-length of light that bounces off the surface of it.Djbrown wrote:
the pen is red
What airsupply ? ... and what instrument ?DeathUnlimited wrote:
Yes you can if you use an instrument to hold your air supplyVaregg wrote:
Prove this wrong !
You cant kill yourself by holding your breath !
If that's how you want to take it then np. My statement is the correct one anyway..bennisboy wrote:
Hmmm I am extremely sceptical. Because the original statement is true, you haven't actually proved it wrong, you just used another statement
EDIT: damn spelling
Varegg wrote:
What airsupply ? ... and what instrument ?DeathUnlimited wrote:
Yes you can if you use an instrument to hold your air supplyVaregg wrote:
Prove this wrong !
You cant kill yourself by holding your breath !
You said you where gonna prove it, i see no proof because you are still here witch proves you to be wrong *muhahahahahahahaha*
Tricked you
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-02-18 06:32:16)
And dont try this at home kids - it could cause brain damage !DeathUnlimited wrote:
Varegg wrote:
What airsupply ? ... and what instrument ?DeathUnlimited wrote:
Yes you can if you use an instrument to hold your air supply
You said you where gonna prove it, i see no proof because you are still here witch proves you to be wrong *muhahahahahahahaha*
Tricked you
Well.. Let's say I proved it on paper, not practically.
Talk about brain damage to kids that seriously play BF series for points...Varegg wrote:
And dont try this at home kids - it could cause brain damage !
And DU, prove my last statement wrong will ya *lol*DeathUnlimited wrote:
Talk about brain damage to kids that seriously play BF series for points...Varegg wrote:
And dont try this at home kids - it could cause brain damage !
he he yes I know, you are using an article from my mentor Gregers rom andersen. But I said that Sordarin inhibits ATP binding, which the article show with FRED technique. I am stating that it inhibits ATP binding by inducing conformational changes to eEF2. You don't answer that part you just state that sordarin can displace ATP. that does not mean that the binding site is the same, as you imply, so how will you prove me wrong?DeathUnlimited wrote:
In fact: Yeast eEF2 is also shown to bind adenylic nucleotides, which can be displaced by sordarin, suggesting that ADP or ATP also bind to the three C-terminal domains of eEF2voodoodolphins wrote:
what about the statement: Sordarin inhibits ATP binding of eEF2 by inducing conformational changes
Source: http://www.jbc.org/cgi/reprint/M607830200v1.pdf
that would be more correct. nothing binds ATP.
No you didn't. your dog subconsciously affected you so that it could get that name.PMcS wrote:
I named my dog Bob
k, you win have some cookies.voodoodolphins wrote:
he he yes I know, you are using an article from my mentor Gregers rom andersen. But I said that Sordarin inhibits ATP binding, which the article show with FRED technique. I am stating that it inhibits ATP binding by inducing conformational changes to eEF2. You don't answer that part you just state that sordarin can displace ATP. that does not mean that the binding site is the same, as you imply, so how will you prove me wrong?DeathUnlimited wrote:
In fact: Yeast eEF2 is also shown to bind adenylic nucleotides, which can be displaced by sordarin, suggesting that ADP or ATP also bind to the three C-terminal domains of eEF2voodoodolphins wrote:
what about the statement: Sordarin inhibits ATP binding of eEF2 by inducing conformational changes
Source: http://www.jbc.org/cgi/reprint/M607830200v1.pdf
that would be more correct. nothing binds ATP.
anyways I really like this thread, it fun to read and original
he he thx....keep up the good work.DeathUnlimited wrote:
k, you win have some cookies.voodoodolphins wrote:
he he yes I know, you are using an article from my mentor Gregers rom andersen. But I said that Sordarin inhibits ATP binding, which the article show with FRED technique. I am stating that it inhibits ATP binding by inducing conformational changes to eEF2. You don't answer that part you just state that sordarin can displace ATP. that does not mean that the binding site is the same, as you imply, so how will you prove me wrong?DeathUnlimited wrote:
In fact: Yeast eEF2 is also shown to bind adenylic nucleotides, which can be displaced by sordarin, suggesting that ADP or ATP also bind to the three C-terminal domains of eEF2
Source: http://www.jbc.org/cgi/reprint/M607830200v1.pdf
that would be more correct. nothing binds ATP.
anyways I really like this thread, it fun to read and original
Yes but then by definition it is not longer hydrogen, it is helium. Therefore, Hydrogen always has one proton.DeathUnlimited wrote:
In fact I think It has been bombed with protons and they have even sticked to it for a while, until crashing.Djbrown wrote:
ok how about hydrogen contains 1 proton. not dueterium or any of its heavy variants just H1 hydrogen.
also deuterium and tritium also contain 1 proton, they just have 2 and 3 neutrons.
Last edited by jimmanycricket (2007-02-18 06:51:29)