I dont usually play CSS but a few mates started a LAN so i joined in, after getting used to it i got sort of good, everyone was complaing about how accurate i was, so we finished the round and they played BF2 with me, they couldnt get a shot on me before i pwnd them, so what im asking is BF2 more leniant on accuracy?
I found the opposite. BF2 is easy to aim, CSS is hard.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
I play css to learn how to aim in BF2, head shots in bf 2 are harder but css teaches you to trak better.
css the people are like right in front of you in a narrwo corridor so its easy to hit them bf2 is much more open and longer ranged so bf2 is harder for aiming i rekon
Yeah man, you really need to practice your aiming in Css...Flecco wrote:
I found the opposite. BF2 is easy to aim, CSS is hard.
CSS and BF2 are two different animals when it comes to aiming. BF2 forces you to pretty much pick your shots. CSS leaves you free to run and gun without any serious accuracy dampening.
lol.... i get soooo many headshots in bf2, but barely any in css . i suck.Invaderzim wrote:
I play css to learn how to aim in BF2, head shots in bf 2 are harder but css teaches you to trak better.
Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal
In Css its piss to get headshots with a machine gun or infact anything, in bf2 its quite a bit harder. Guess guns have less spread in CSS.
I think the thing with BF2 is there is no head shot confirmation. So you cant actually tell whether you popped a head or not, because the guy may already have lost a lot of health. So you notice more headshots in CSS because of the cool little icon