So, if the guy standing next to me threatens to kills someone, the police are entitled to shoot me?
Horrible analogy you have there. Its more like a guy kills a police officer. Then you let that guy hide in your house while he continues to fire at the police outside while you refuse to take any action such as allowing the police to come inside and secure the area.Bubbalo wrote:
So, if the guy standing next to me threatens to kills someone, the police are entitled to shoot me?
What about the guy next door who has nothing to do with any of it? Because your neighbour is a terrorist, you should get bombed to shit to?-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Horrible analogy you have there. Its more like a guy kills a police officer. Then you let that guy hide in your house while he continues to fire at the police outside while you refuse to take any action such as allowing the police to come inside and secure the area.Bubbalo wrote:
So, if the guy standing next to me threatens to kills someone, the police are entitled to shoot me?
Your anology is just like his previous one. Please read what we are saying before you try and debate.PRiMACORD wrote:
What about the guy next door who has nothing to do with any of it? Because your neighbour is a terrorist, you should get bombed to shit to?-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Horrible analogy you have there. Its more like a guy kills a police officer. Then you let that guy hide in your house while he continues to fire at the police outside while you refuse to take any action such as allowing the police to come inside and secure the area.Bubbalo wrote:
So, if the guy standing next to me threatens to kills someone, the police are entitled to shoot me?
The Israelis never asked to come in and help, the Lebanese government didn't "let" Hizballah in, and the police would have to have first beaten the crap out of the guy (see occupation of Lebanon).-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
Horrible analogy you have there. Its more like a guy kills a police officer. Then you let that guy hide in your house while he continues to fire at the police outside while you refuse to take any action such as allowing the police to come inside and secure the area.
actually nana's analogy is pretty spot on
No it isn't. Why?
1) In his, the occupant decides to shelter a murderer (who has killed for no reason) becuase they feel like it. Lebanon, however, was occupied by Israel, which is when Hizballah was created
2) I've not heard Israel ask the Lebanese to let them come in and sort it out. Even if they had, Lebanon has every reason to deem it suspicious: Israel are highly militarised, and not necessarily the most open and honest nation on Earth.
3) There would have to be a multitude of occupants, who had little ability to stop the offender: most Lebanese are unarmed, and unable to take on a terrorist organisation.
1) In his, the occupant decides to shelter a murderer (who has killed for no reason) becuase they feel like it. Lebanon, however, was occupied by Israel, which is when Hizballah was created
2) I've not heard Israel ask the Lebanese to let them come in and sort it out. Even if they had, Lebanon has every reason to deem it suspicious: Israel are highly militarised, and not necessarily the most open and honest nation on Earth.
3) There would have to be a multitude of occupants, who had little ability to stop the offender: most Lebanese are unarmed, and unable to take on a terrorist organisation.
1. Israel pulled out over five years ago, yet you think that gives Hezbollah a right to still take action and disturb the peace.Bubbalo wrote:
No it isn't. Why?
1) In his, the occupant decides to shelter a murderer (who has killed for no reason) becuase they feel like it. Lebanon, however, was occupied by Israel, which is when Hizballah was created
2) I've not heard Israel ask the Lebanese to let them come in and sort it out. Even if they had, Lebanon has every reason to deem it suspicious: Israel are highly militarised, and not necessarily the most open and honest nation on Earth.
3) There would have to be a multitude of occupants, who had little ability to stop the offender: most Lebanese are unarmed, and unable to take on a terrorist organisation.
2. Israel has asked Lebanon to send in their millitary and secure their own territory. They are now threatening to join sides with Hezbollah.
3. Lebanon's army would be the ones fighting the terrorists, not civilians.
1) Yes, but that grievance is what prompted the creation of Hizballah
2) Yet in your analogy you use police, whose job it is to go in. Regardless, the Lebanese military probably couldn't do much, and sending the order might lead to the military turning on the government.
3) Yes, but Lebanese civilians are the ones being killed by Israel.
2) Yet in your analogy you use police, whose job it is to go in. Regardless, the Lebanese military probably couldn't do much, and sending the order might lead to the military turning on the government.
3) Yes, but Lebanese civilians are the ones being killed by Israel.
They pulled out and left mines. They then refused to give maps for those mine fields.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
1. Israel pulled out over five years ago, yet you think that gives Hezbollah a right to still take action and disturb the peace.
Here is your territory back, try not get blown up by our mines lol.
whoa really, can you prove that? we never hear that stuff here. we only get pro israel news.PRiMACORD wrote:
They pulled out and left mines. They then refused to give maps for those mine fields.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
1. Israel pulled out over five years ago, yet you think that gives Hezbollah a right to still take action and disturb the peace.
Here is your territory back, try not get blown up by our mines lol.
130,000 land mines left in Southern Lebanon by Israel is the conservative estimate. I've seen other claims of up to 400,000.Horseman 77 wrote:
whoa really, can you prove that? we never hear that stuff here. we only get pro israel news.PRiMACORD wrote:
They pulled out and left mines. They then refused to give maps for those mine fields.-=NHB=- Bananahands wrote:
1. Israel pulled out over five years ago, yet you think that gives Hezbollah a right to still take action and disturb the peace.
Here is your territory back, try not get blown up by our mines lol.
http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/56/stateme … banonE.htm
http://www.bintjbeil.com/E/mines/index.html
War is hell.
I'm sure the Israelies are just jumping for joy over it.
I'm sure the Israelies are just jumping for joy over it.
lolz /w wut? a giant snoball? if u havent noticed we have jackshit as an army.herrr_smity wrote:
Shit, now Canada has to bomb Israel to get even.