eurofighter

2006-04-05 13:14:03

#1

elite: Member; +89|6935|Sheffield, England

the most advanced plane ever made just come into british service the other day

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … mp;pl=true

cant wait to see this beast in action

2006-04-05 13:37:41

#2

Erkut.hv: Member; +124|6956|California

That will be the true test. Looks like it handles like a dream, compared to the pig of a fighter in EF. I'm impressed, but it needs to be combat proven.

2006-04-05 13:52:05

#3

Rosse_modest: Member; +76|6997|Antwerp, Flanders

That is one sexy aircraft.

I wish we could just get rid of our antique F16s and buy some of these babies.

But since our minister of defense (looks like a pompous bloated toad) seems intent on turning whatever's left of our pathetic military into a freak circus, I don't see that happening any time soon.

2006-04-05 14:01:03

#4

Jepeto87: Member; +38|6906|Dublin

I taught the F-22 is the most advanced plane evermade?

2006-04-05 16:08:29

#5

elite: Member; +89|6935|Sheffield, England

nah man, the eurofighter is i think, the pilot can lock onto his target by using his helmet, n shit

2006-04-05 19:26:21

#6

shyuechou: Member; +5|6859|Singapore

The Eurofighter is a generation 4.5 aircraft with limited supercruise capability and limited stealth.

The F-22 is a true generation 5 aircraft. Big difference.

The Su-35 is only generation 4.

The MiG 1-44 should be generation 5 but the programme has either been delayed or scrapped. The Sukhoi S.37 Berkut is generation 4.5 but it is only a technology demonstrator.

2006-04-05 23:08:08

#7

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6937

F-22 and eurofighter have much different roles...

F-22 = go out and bomb the shit outta ppl
Typhoon = Homeland defence, but good in offense combat

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2006-04-05 23:24:37

#8

Home: Section.80; +447|7068|Seattle, Washington, USA

I love how they have the nice little violin music in the background while they show off a machine designed for killing.

2006-04-06 00:41:51

#10

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|6866

Jepeto87 wrote:
I taught the F-22 is the most advanced plane evermade?

I thought that too...lol who knows

2006-04-06 00:48:03

#11

B.Schuss: I'm back, baby... ( sort of ); +664|7062|Cologne, Germany

I guess the F-22 is more advanced, considering development for the Eurofighter began that long ago ( wasn't it in the 80's ? ).

but the two fighters really have different tactial roles, so there is no use in comparing them. I guess.

2006-04-06 01:01:54

#12

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6937

B.Schuss wrote:
I guess the F-22 is more advanced, considering development for the Eurofighter began that long ago ( wasn't it in the 80's ? ).

but the two fighters really have different tactial roles, so there is no use in comparing them. I guess.

a flying ace said its like comparing a nascar car w/ a F1 car...

2006-04-06 01:21:23

#13

UON: Junglist Massive; +223|6874

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:
Eurofighter in game is awful. I hope the real one doesn't handle like that POS :p

I doubt it. It's not like they tried very hard to make planes realistic in BF2. Where's the G force white/blackouts and the ejector seat, for starters? Wish I felt like sims had got better since XFX and EF2000, now the graphics are sick and everything. Flying is more designed for instant appeal and quick thrills in BF2. Can anyone name a recent multiplayer flight sim with Eurofighter (excluding shitty Fighter Pilot)?

2006-04-06 03:44:31

#14

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,053|6992|PNW

I don't care. The name "Eurofighter" fails to intimidate me. I guess I line it up with "Euro Disney."

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-04-06 03:44:46)

2006-04-06 05:02:36

#15

delta4bravo*nl*: Dutch Delight; +68|6973

Since when is the F22 in production?
The Project is still under development, as JSF JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER

So yes the eurofighter is the best out there.

2006-04-06 06:53:24

#16

shyuechou: Member; +5|6859|Singapore

I recommend:

'Designed for the Kill: The Jet Fighter - Development and Experience' by Mike Spick

2006-04-06 07:25:11

#17

herrr_smity: Member; +156|6848|space command ur anus

its not ment to combat the f22 so therby its not trying to be better
The Sukhoi-27 Flanker is the standard by which Western aircraft are measured in the post cold war environment. Only the prohibitively expensive F-22 comes close to matching the Flanker on mission effectiveness, whereas the Eurofighter Typhoon performs better than the remaining aircraft, trumping its rival on cost.

2006-04-06 07:28:20

#18

herrr_smity: Member; +156|6848|space command ur anus

herrr_smity wrote:
its not ment to combat the f22 so therby its not trying to be better
The Sukhoi-27 Flanker is the standard by which Western aircraft are measured in the post cold war environment. Only the prohibitively expensive F-22 comes close to matching the Flanker on mission effectiveness, whereas the Eurofighter Typhoon performs better than the remaining aircraft, trumping its rival on cost.

http://www.eurofighter.com/Typhoon/Cost/

2006-04-06 07:29:03

#19

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6937

delta4bravo*nl* wrote:
Since when is the F22 in production?
The Project is still under development, as JSF JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER

So yes the eurofighter is the best out there.

um... it was officially used in the year 2004... the f35 is the JSF...

get your facts straight before posting

2006-04-06 07:39:32

#20

elite: Member; +89|6935|Sheffield, England

the eurofighter was design for dog fights and air to air combat, its sposed to be te most manouverable fighter out there, and that video sure makes it look like it can

2006-04-06 13:05:50

#21

Flavius Aetius: Member; +3|6890|Stalking Chuck Norris

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
F-22 and eurofighter have much different roles...

F-22 = go out and bomb the shit outta ppl
Typhoon = Homeland defence, but good in offense combat

I really don't think the F-22 is primarily built for bombing missions, its not built as a bomber at all... It can, but so can most planes. Why would it have thrust vectoring and everything else that makes it a fighter just to bomb stuff?

2006-04-06 13:56:20

#22

herrr_smity: Member; +156|6848|space command ur anus

Flavius Aetius wrote:
cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
F-22 and eurofighter have much different roles...

F-22 = go out and bomb the shit outta ppl
Typhoon = Homeland defence, but good in offense combat
I really don't think the F-22 is primarily built for bombing missions, its not built as a bomber at all... It can, but so can most planes. Why would it have thrust vectoring and everything else that makes it a fighter just to bomb stuff?

isn't there an F-23 made as a bombing model
and the F-22 is build as an air superiority fighter

2006-04-06 18:27:34

#23

shyuechou: Member; +5|6859|Singapore

The XF-22 and XF-23 were competing aircraft for the role of an air superiority aircraft and also as the replacement of the F-15. The XF-22 won and became the F-22. The XF-23 was retired.

The XF-32 and XF-35 were competing aircraft for the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) programme which was originally the JAST programme. The XF-35 won and became the F-35.

F-22
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-22.htm
F-23
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-23.htm

2006-04-11 08:45:45

#24

raz: Member; +22|6884|England, UK

Eurofighter owns all in ait to air combat

Although.. It's not about the jet, it's about the PILOT.

Last edited by raz (2006-04-11 08:46:41)

2006-04-11 19:40:30

#25

RAIMIUS: You with the face!; +244|6935|US

Can anybody post some descriptive comparisons between the EF2000 and the F/A-22? Please don't just post a slew of numbers. I just don't have time to do this today.

BF2S Forums eurofighter

Jepeto87 wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

herrr_smity wrote:

delta4bravonl wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Flavius Aetius wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Board footer