xBlackPantherx
Grow up, or die
+142|6558|California

Longbow wrote:

xBlackPantherx wrote:

I honestly think that DICE would benefit exponentially by 'hiring' people from say..the Sir Community. That way they would have a direct link to real players and the actual community views while having people that understand the build of the game very well and offer a different PoV of the game, a community view. They already made a good step in this direction by the Sirs' Wake Island 2142.
Keep your Sir's Community off my Battlefield games please. Wake Island 2142 is piece of crap (well not as bad as Shingle, but still no match for official maps).
Care to explain instead of just bitching?
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|6931

xBlackPantherx wrote:

Longbow wrote:

xBlackPantherx wrote:

I honestly think that DICE would benefit exponentially by 'hiring' people from say..the Sir Community. That way they would have a direct link to real players and the actual community views while having people that understand the build of the game very well and offer a different PoV of the game, a community view. They already made a good step in this direction by the Sirs' Wake Island 2142.
Keep your Sir's Community off my Battlefield games please. Wake Island 2142 is piece of crap (well not as bad as Shingle, but still no match for official maps).
Care to explain instead of just bitching?
I'm friends with Jason who made Shingle and he is a really talented guy... the Sir Community has a ton of talent also...
Like i always say... If you want to criticize a map... grab the bfeditor and make a better map...
it just sounds petty to rag on a map that someone created... don't play the map if you don't like it...
Love is the answer
TheBestYet
The man who Motivated Michael Jackson
+7|5645
I hope it's just like bf2 with new maps new graphics new weapons new vehicles new armies and no bugs!
xBlackPantherx
Grow up, or die
+142|6558|California

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

xBlackPantherx wrote:

Longbow wrote:


Keep your Sir's Community off my Battlefield games please. Wake Island 2142 is piece of crap (well not as bad as Shingle, but still no match for official maps).
Care to explain instead of just bitching?
I'm friends with Jason who made Shingle and he is a really talented guy... the Sir Community has a ton of talent also...
Like i always say... If you want to criticize a map... grab the bfeditor and make a better map...
it just sounds petty to rag on a map that someone created... don't play the map if you don't like it...
That's what I say to eveyone who has complained about DICE taking too long to make new games.
UUD40
Member
+8|6586|San Diego, CA
bf2 is arcade style? :x

Last edited by UUD40 (2009-06-15 23:20:57)

Cyrax-Sektor
Official Battlefield fanboy
+240|6363|San Antonio, Texas

UUD40 wrote:

bf2 is arcade style? :x
That's what most sellers brand it to be. Especially Best Buy. :p
HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5699|Bolingbrook, Illinois
EA Confirms Battlefield 3 in Development
The big Battlefield news going around today is a quote by EA's Chief operating officer John Pleasants basically confirming the development of Battlefield 3; something the Battlefield community has been hoping for all along. The fiscal year ends March 31, 2010.

Update: Karl-Magnus Troedsson, Executive Producer of the Battlefield Franchise posted a message on his twitter again confirming BF3 is in development with no further comment.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

We can confirm that Battlefield 3 is currently in development but at this stage we have no further comments to add.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

G4TV

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Criterion Games working on a Need For Speed game wasn't the only surprising bit of news that Electronic Arts chief operating office John Pleasants tucked into his presentation at the William Blair Growth Stock Conference I listened to today. Pleasants confirmed he's seen DICE's work on Battlefield 3.

"I've had the luxury of looking at Battlefield 3 over at DICE in Sweden and was highly impressed by the way the team is working on that product," he said. "Of course, that's not [coming out] in the fiscal year, but that is a product that is looking very good."

Gamers worried that Battlefield: Bad Company, Battlefield Heroes and Battlefield 1943 were a three-pronged answer to fans demanding a third Battlefield don't have to worry. Battlefield 3 is coming!

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

G4TV.com
GameSpot (Additional background info)
HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5699|Bolingbrook, Illinois
Battlefield 3 Planned for Holiday 2010?
A site called Tech Fragments claims to have some additional information on Battlefield 3 stating they have been tipped off it will support 40 players per team, 24 vehicles, and 17 weapons with unlocks. They also seem to have heard it will be out in the 2010 holiday season with a free 1 map playable beta a few months before possibly in summer 2010.

Many are speculating this appears to be the same "leaked" info from October 2007 just the date has been changed.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

We have also gotten information from a tipster that Battlefield 3 will be similar to Battlefield 2 and will support up to 40 players per team. There will also be 24 different vehicles that you can choose from and 17 different weapons. Like Battlefield 2, the game will also feature unlockable equipment.

So when will Battlefield 3 be released? The time isn't known but EA says not this year. We also heard that it would be the holiday season in 2010, however like with many of the other Battle field installments we'll probably get an early one map beta that can be played free a few months before. We're speculating that we'll see a Battlefield 3 Beta download in the Summer of 2010. However, nobody knows for sure.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

TechFragments.com
The_Sniper_NM
Official EVGA Fanboy
+94|6328|SC | USA |
So basically the leaked info which was believed to be fake actually had some truth to it.

If my rig now can't run it on high, I will gladly build an entire new one when it comes out. (Sandy Bridge and GTX 300 anyone)
ICCULUS
Free Sam, Ban Finray.
+418|5639|Athens, GA
sick
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|6907
Time to make some money.
venom6
Since day One.
+247|6773|Hungary
40 vs 40 sounds sweet!
.:i7|Batman
Banned
+27|5715| - | - | - | - | - |

venom6 wrote:

40 vs 40 sounds sweet!
ehhhh no.

Assuming they took nade spam, explosives, etc into consideration when making the maps, it could be ok, but otherwise 80 players seems like a bit too much.
H3RB4L ABU53
+45|6082|123 | 456 | 789 | Δ
I think a map the size of Fushe Pass would be good with 80 players
northsider
Member
+1|5849|Chicago
Sounds cool...but how long must we wait?  2010?  I find this unlikely.
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6906|Devon, England
Fuck yeah!
nickb64
formerly from OC (it's EXACTLY like on tv)[truth]
+77|5826|Greatest Nation on Earth(USA)

H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:

I think a map the size of Fushe Pass would be good with 80 players
Dragon Valley type map would be good, or Mashtuur City(that would be crazy).
specialistx2324
hahahahahhaa
+244|6903|arica harbour

.:i7|Batman wrote:

venom6 wrote:

40 vs 40 sounds sweet!
ehhhh no.

Assuming they took nade spam, explosives, etc into consideration when making the maps, it could be ok, but otherwise 80 players seems like a bit too much.
plus a 40 vs 40 with nade spam will make the game super laggy.  pings above 45 to me are not acceptable but then again does dice really give a rats ass about anything anymore.
nibiru2012
Member
+10|5630
I like the 64 man servers , the bigger the better , more fun/action 
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6976

nibiru2012 wrote:

I like the 64 man servers , the bigger the better , more fun/action 
whats up cdgmn
nibiru2012
Member
+10|5630

usmarine wrote:

nibiru2012 wrote:

I like the 64 man servers , the bigger the better , more fun/action 
whats up cdgmn
hey how you're doing , and how and the hell did you know ??? , karma when I build some up 
nibiru2012
Member
+10|5630
ATG must had told you ,lol
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6976

nibiru2012 wrote:

ATG must had told you ,lol
nope.  its not hard to figure out brah
nibiru2012
Member
+10|5630
the  /
chittydog
less busy
+586|7050|Kubra, Damn it!

specialistx2324 wrote:

.:i7|Batman wrote:

venom6 wrote:

40 vs 40 sounds sweet!
ehhhh no.

Assuming they took nade spam, explosives, etc into consideration when making the maps, it could be ok, but otherwise 80 players seems like a bit too much.
plus a 40 vs 40 with nade spam will make the game super laggy.  pings above 45 to me are not acceptable but then again does dice really give a rats ass about anything anymore.
As long as you're not playing BF3 on the same machine you played BF2 on when it came out years ago, you should be fine. You have at least a year and a half to save for upgrades. Start fattening that piggybank!

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard