why do i suddenly have to prove my credentials as a creator because i debate your dipshit theories on an internet forum?
‘all i do is criticise’ – LOL. most of my social life revolves around books, going to the cinema/theatre, attending concerts/gigs, museums and galleries etc (as any normal person’s life should). it involves plenty of praise and enthusiasm for things, and sharing in it and discussing it avidly with friends.
yea i criticise crank racist theories which involve prejudice against other innocent people or come at someone else’s expense (no fault ever lies with dilbert i note). and yea i think it’s pathetic that a grown man listens only to lady gaga and watches kids films (again it can’t possibly be because dilbert is missing anything).
the most pathetic thing of all is that you genuinely believe that any cultural object made more than a ‘generation ago’ is old news, as if the entire archive of human creation is worthless and has nothing to say. i don’t think i’ve ever met anyone with such a meagre imagination. you exist in a wasteland. no wonder you’re angry and bitter at everyone else and no woman wants you.
and i’ve published writing, i write and have worked on projects with photographers and musicians. if you think i’m going to share my published stuff and name with this toxic environment then you’ve got another thing coming
you’ve got about as much chance of getting macbeth to share his state of NJ teaching certificate.
and again, not that i think anyone needs to create to be a good critic. read edmund wilson or james wood. did roger ebert ever direct a film? your entire notion is philistine and moronic.
Last edited by uziq (2020-03-10 02:25:52)