And yet white Christian military veterans are America's most effective terrorists.
Fuck Israel
so, anything that's stereotypically black is automatically racist?Jay wrote:
Because they exaggerated her facial features to make them more stereotypically black. i.e. big lips and frizzy hair.
that other one is a japanese lady? lol, okay.SuperJail Warden wrote:
The problem is probably that Serena is pictured with a head of nappy hair with ape features meanwhile the Black Japanese lady got white washed into a petite blonde.
it directly partakes in a history of depictions of 'blackness' which was used in racist literature, basically. that style of depicting a black woman very consciously plays on images and tropes of black people that have been peddled by racists in the past. it's not that picking out *any* stereotypical feature makes something racist. that's an incredibly naive attitude. it's to do with context. those sorts of stereotypical depictions have appeared throughout the 19th and 20th centuries specifically in the context of race hate literature that aimed to demonise or dehumanise black people and trivialise their concerns.Shahter wrote:
would somebody from murica or australia please explain to me how could this be viewed as racist by any sane person?
i mean i don't normally bother with this, because for a russkie like myself this whole issue a far far away thing happening among people who had a history like nothing i ever came into contact with, but this one is just insane - and it's on every news page i open for the last few days.
what the actual fuck?
Last edited by uziq (2018-09-14 07:48:18)
the girl looks predominantly japanese, not black. her surname is osaka ffs.SuperJail Warden wrote:
The girl she played against is black and Japanese. You would assume she was just black if you didn't know she was mixed. Once you know she is half Japanese, you notice her facial features are Japanese.
Last edited by uziq (2018-09-14 07:42:38)
Yes, because it's been used as putdowns for a very long time in this country. Same goes for Australian aboriginees.Shahter wrote:
so, anything that's stereotypically black is automatically racist?Jay wrote:
Because they exaggerated her facial features to make them more stereotypically black. i.e. big lips and frizzy hair.
https://ferris.edu/jimcrow/Jay wrote:
Yes, because it's been used as putdowns for a very long time in this country. Same goes for Australian aboriginees.Shahter wrote:
so, anything that's stereotypically black is automatically racist?Jay wrote:
Because they exaggerated her facial features to make them more stereotypically black. i.e. big lips and frizzy hair.
Jay wrote:
Yes, because it's been used as putdowns for a very long time in this country. Same goes for Australian aboriginees.Shahter wrote:
so, anything that's stereotypically black is automatically racist?
right. so, basically, by these standarts it's impossible to draw a caricature of a black person, or jewish person or <put any other group which had been stereotipically pictrured in the past here> that wouldn't be racist of anti-smitic or what not, huh? there's always a context of the kind you described, is there not? serena, for example, is black, brutish, with big lips and has frizzy hair - how do you draw a cartoon of her omitting those features which would still be recognizably about her?uziq wrote:
what you're basically saying is, 'i just don't understand why all the butthurt about this piccanninnie thing?' or 'what's wrong with depicting a jew with a big crooked nose in a cartoon - don't many jews have big crooked noses?' the cartoon is essentially quoting racism.
Last edited by uziq (2018-09-14 10:05:52)