BF2S Forums EE (hats 2018

Last edited by uziq (2018-09-09 03:54:53)

Dilbert_X wrote:

Well, you have:

1. No motive
2. No evidence

So I can ignore everything you say

Shahter wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Well, you have:

1. No motive
2. No evidence

right. well, actually, i do have a kind of motive. as to evidence, since i'm not here to accuse you of anything, i don't think i need any. it's may & co who are making extraordinary claims, me - i'm only speculating.

So I can ignore everything you say

you totally can. just as putin can ignore theresa.

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Jay wrote:

The white fat is simply inflamed fat cells due to insulin resistance caused by excessive carbohydrate intake. If you were to limit your carbohydrate intake severely, the white fat would convert to brown fat on its own. The body processes alcohol first, then carbohydrates, then protein, and fat last. Usually on a standard low fat diet the body never gets a chance to burn body fat so it all goes into storage in already overloaded fat cells, hence the inflammation.

wow you have no clue what you are talking about.

You are conflating how quickly your body processes fuels with what fuels your body processes first. The most basic explanation is that it (biochemical breakdown of fuels) depends on what you eat and what activities you are doing for what amount of time, and although it is somewhat constant (certain activities will generally burn certain fuels first, for a set period of time), there are so many variables and inputs that you simply can't make a blanket assertion.  You can practice certain behaviors that can 'trick' the body short term, like fluctuating your protein and fat intake along with your exercise routine, but the truth is the metabolic process in humans is not very well understood in relation to energy consumption and output, which you've clearly demonstrated.

"The Case Against Sugar wrote:

Answers began coming with the very first publications out of Yalow and Berson’s laboratory and were swiftly confirmed by others. As it turns out, virtually all hormones work to mobilize fat from fat cells so that it can then be used for fuel. Hormones are signaling our bodies to act—flee or fight, reproduce, grow—and they also signal the fat cells to make available the fuel necessary for these actions. The one dominant exception to this fuel-mobilization signaling is insulin, the same hormone that researchers still assumed in the early 1960s to be deficient in all cases of diabetes. Insulin, Yalow and Berson reported, can be thought of as orchestrating how the body uses or “partitions” the fuel it takes in.

When blood-sugar (glucose) levels rise, the pancreas secretes insulin in response, which then signals the muscle cells to take up and burn more glucose. Insulin also signals the fat cells to take up fat and hold on to it. Only when the rising tide of blood sugar begins to ebb will insulin levels ebb as well, at which point the fat cells will release their stored fuel into the circulation (in the form of fatty acids); the cells of muscles and organs now burn this fat rather than glucose. Blood sugar is controlled within a healthy range, and fat flows in and out of fat cells as needed. The one biological factor necessary to get fat out of fat cells and have it used for fuel, as Yalow and Berson noted in 1965, is “the negative stimulus of insulin deficiency.” These revelations on the various actions of insulin led Yalow and Berson to call it the most “lipogenic” hormone, meaning fat-forming. And this lipogenic signal has to be turned down, muted significantly, for the fat cells to release their stored fat and the body to use it for fuel.

uziq wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont … P4Tv2EIUDQ

this is a literal third-world country. economy smaller than failing spain. we should take the big shiny missiles away from these monkeys.

Shahter wrote:

more convincing than may, imo

Last edited by uziq (2018-09-13 05:44:14)

Last edited by uziq (2018-09-13 07:16:18)