BF2S Forums DAST Chat

Macbeth wrote:

As the Republican presidential nomination process begins, one GOP candidate is making a name for himself as the Islamophobia candidate: Herman Cain.

Earlier this week, Cain gave an interview to Christianity Today in which he declared that, “based upon the little knowledge that I have of the Muslim religion, you know, they have an objective to convert all infidels or kill them.”

ThinkProgress caught up with the former CEO of Godfather’s Pizza today at the Conservative Principles Conference in Des Moines, Iowa, to discuss his comments further. We asked him, in light of his statements on Islam, would he be comfortable appointing any Muslims in his administration. Rather than skirting the question or hedging his answer, as most presidential aspirants are wont to do, Cain was definitive: “No, I would not”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … DXCwd65R5o
The Tea Party candidate for the 2012 presidential election. At this rate Obama is going to have an easy reelection.

greasemonkey wrote:

Script Summary:
Circumvents the New York Times (NYT) Paywall in three lines of code.

Kmar wrote:

There's been some hubbub about the NYT putting up a pay wall on it's internet site this week. I guess they let you read a few articles for free before you hit the wall. I enjoy reading their content for various reasons. However, it's hard for me to justify paying to read anything on the internet.

Edit..looks like I wont have to pay.

greasemonkey wrote:

Script Summary:
Circumvents the New York Times (NYT) Paywall in three lines of code.

edit edit.. actually it's even easier than that.
http://mashable.com/2011/03/28/how-to-b … s-paywall/

Last edited by Jay (2011-03-29 04:40:48)

Kmar wrote:

There's been some hubbub about the NYT putting up a pay wall on it's internet site this week. I guess they let you read a few articles for free before you hit the wall. I enjoy reading their content for various reasons. However, it's hard for me to justify paying to read anything on the internet.

Edit..looks like I wont have to pay.

greasemonkey wrote:

Script Summary:
Circumvents the New York Times (NYT) Paywall in three lines of code.

edit edit.. actually it's even easier than that.
http://mashable.com/2011/03/28/how-to-b … s-paywall/

In an effort to highlight content of interest to the subscribers it values most, The New York Times announced Monday it would move all articles you could not possibly give a shit about unless you make more than $200,000 into one handy section. "From now on, people looking for helpful hints on renovating a $4 million Manhattan townhouse won't have to waste time sifting through articles on the crisis of public education," Times executive editor Bill Keller said of the new section, which will be printed in smudge-proof ink so it doesn't soil the soft, pink hands of its readers. "They can flip straight to TimesElite for the latest on society weddings, Tuscan getaways, and the rising cost of boat winterization." Keller added that if the experiment proved successful, the Times might create a similar section for moms in Brooklyn.

Last edited by Macbeth (2011-03-29 17:25:10)

11 Bravo wrote:

impeech obama

burnzz wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

impeech obama

at this point? vote him out in '12, or run the risk of being labeled 'racist'. if you couldn't catch Slick Willie lying about sex in the Oval Office, you*re not gonna catch No Drama Obama making a career ending mistake . . .

Last edited by NeXuS (2011-03-30 06:41:37)

11 Bravo wrote:

well it would be a nice gesture.  he is gone.  funny how it works.  everyone votes repubs out then like almost instantly they want them back.

Last edited by Shocking (2011-03-30 09:32:57)

Shocking wrote:

I dunno if Bush was really that terrible, he wasn't a great public speaker and was dealt an extraordinarily bad hand with everything that happened under his presidency. I guess Iraq was a major fuckup though, meh.

I dislike cheney more, definitely.