so how good, from a neutral point of view, was this match?
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
I heard form a customer tonight that Chelsea played better in the first half.Sturgeon wrote:
Obviously biased but it was a fairly exciting match, first half was quite open, United controlled the game well second half though.
I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert here, like I said, I'm just going by what I saw. If the decision was consistent with the officiating in other matches, though, I guess I don't have a problem with it.Sturgeon wrote:
He'd had a few tackles before that too, the referees in particular in European leagues/European games have tried to stamp out tackles from behind, automatic freekick etc.
What Ramires did was just stupid, Nani was going nowhere, there's no need to clatter into him.
wtf. you make no sensenukchebi0 wrote:
My bad, I did mean yellow card; I was just focusing on the result, which was a red card..
Last edited by KingCheese (2011-04-13 09:14:41)
How complicated is it? While he did receive a yellow card, the result is a sending off, i.e a red card.Camm wrote:
wtf. you make no sensenukchebi0 wrote:
My bad, I did mean yellow card; I was just focusing on the result, which was a red card..
And in this case, it seemed he should have been, nothing more.Jenspm wrote:
A yellow is a yellow, no matter if you've already had one or not.
They tend to be more lenient with the second one though, as no referee enjoys handing out reds, but in principle they should be equal.
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2011-04-13 09:33:13)
Last edited by KingCheese (2011-04-13 09:37:57)
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2011-04-13 09:52:15)
Last edited by Toilet Sex (2011-04-13 09:53:01)
Last edited by RDMC (2011-04-13 11:38:43)