Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

Like I said right at the start, joining Hamas would achieve nothing, nor would going to Palestine.

Using my vote and raising awareness are about all I can realistically achieve, same as you.
Why would it achieve nothing? If enough people who share your beliefs did so, wouldn't it change the world? Point is, it's all well and good to cry about a peoples plight on an internet message board from the comfort of your air conditioned home, it's quite another to actually do something about it. It's hard to take anyone seriously that doesn't feel strong enough in his convictions that he's willing to die for them if need be. I'm not talking about dying for one's country. I'm talking about taking the bullet for loved ones or having the balls to rise up if he was being oppressed. So, I'm sorry, but you and oug and aussiereaper and anyone else that wants to can can sit there in their homes and berate me because I don't care all they want. You all obviously don't care all that much either beyond the fact that your shared beliefs give you a group to belong to.

I mean at least someone like Hunter/Jumper has the balls to stand up for what he believes in even if it's misguided. There's a reason that the liberals of the world have been labeled pussies, cowards, bedwetters etc. It's because they will always be all talk and zero action. They will point the finger and tell others how they need to live their lives without getting their hands dirty. Hell, I have more respect for the idiots on Whale Wars than I do for the internet heroes that bitch, cry, piss and moan about a people they've never spoken to and would cross the street to avoid if they saw them walking down their own neighborhood.

So use your meaningless vote. Raise your inconsequential voice. Shake your impotent fist. No one cares.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

AussieReaper wrote:

galt, are you a tea bagger?
Newp.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6370|what

JohnG@lt wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

galt, are you a tea bagger?
Newp.
Sad the way they are parading libertarians if you ask me.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

AussieReaper wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

galt, are you a tea bagger?
Newp.
Sad the way they are parading libertarians if you ask me.
Why do you think I despise Beck so much? He co-opted the term to push his neo-conservative dogma under cover of a different name. "Oh, I'm for small government" yeah ok, but you want a bible in every desk and a flag on every home. What the fuck ever.

If you want to pigeonhole me, this is where my beliefs lie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchist
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6323|eXtreme to the maX

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Like I said right at the start, joining Hamas would achieve nothing, nor would going to Palestine.

Using my vote and raising awareness are about all I can realistically achieve, same as you.
Why would it achieve nothing? If enough people who share your beliefs did so, wouldn't it change the world? Point is, it's all well and good to cry about a peoples plight on an internet message board from the comfort of your air conditioned home, it's quite another to actually do something about it. It's hard to take anyone seriously that doesn't feel strong enough in his convictions that he's willing to die for them if need be. I'm not talking about dying for one's country. I'm talking about taking the bullet for loved ones or having the balls to rise up if he was being oppressed. So, I'm sorry, but you and oug and aussiereaper and anyone else that wants to can can sit there in their homes and berate me because I don't care all they want. You all obviously don't care all that much either beyond the fact that your shared beliefs give you a group to belong to.

I mean at least someone like Hunter/Jumper has the balls to stand up for what he believes in even if it's misguided. There's a reason that the liberals of the world have been labeled pussies, cowards, bedwetters etc. It's because they will always be all talk and zero action. They will point the finger and tell others how they need to live their lives without getting their hands dirty. Hell, I have more respect for the idiots on Whale Wars than I do for the internet heroes that bitch, cry, piss and moan about a people they've never spoken to and would cross the street to avoid if they saw them walking down their own neighborhood.

So use your meaningless vote. Raise your inconsequential voice. Shake your impotent fist. No one cares.
If the need arose I would, in the meantime throwing stones at Merkava tanks would be futile.

And its funny you, a citizen of the US, calling me, a citizen of Britain and Australia, out on not going to fight on the side of right or to back ones allies as opposed to venal self-interest - especially given your personal reasons for joining the military - money.
Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Like I said right at the start, joining Hamas would achieve nothing, nor would going to Palestine.

Using my vote and raising awareness are about all I can realistically achieve, same as you.
Why would it achieve nothing? If enough people who share your beliefs did so, wouldn't it change the world? Point is, it's all well and good to cry about a peoples plight on an internet message board from the comfort of your air conditioned home, it's quite another to actually do something about it. It's hard to take anyone seriously that doesn't feel strong enough in his convictions that he's willing to die for them if need be. I'm not talking about dying for one's country. I'm talking about taking the bullet for loved ones or having the balls to rise up if he was being oppressed. So, I'm sorry, but you and oug and aussiereaper and anyone else that wants to can can sit there in their homes and berate me because I don't care all they want. You all obviously don't care all that much either beyond the fact that your shared beliefs give you a group to belong to.

I mean at least someone like Hunter/Jumper has the balls to stand up for what he believes in even if it's misguided. There's a reason that the liberals of the world have been labeled pussies, cowards, bedwetters etc. It's because they will always be all talk and zero action. They will point the finger and tell others how they need to live their lives without getting their hands dirty. Hell, I have more respect for the idiots on Whale Wars than I do for the internet heroes that bitch, cry, piss and moan about a people they've never spoken to and would cross the street to avoid if they saw them walking down their own neighborhood.

So use your meaningless vote. Raise your inconsequential voice. Shake your impotent fist. No one cares.
If the need arose I would, in the meantime throwing stones at Merkava tanks would be futile.

And its funny you, a citizen of the US, calling me, a citizen of Britain and Australia, out on not going to fight on the side of right or to back ones allies as opposed to venal self-interest - especially given your personal reasons for joining the military - money.
So on the one hand you spit on your soldiers and on the other you use them to say "hey I'm doing my part". Cute.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6323|eXtreme to the maX
At what point did I "spit on my soldiers"?
Fuck Israel
oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6737|Πάϊ

JohnG@lt wrote:

The Palestinians simply need to recognize that they've lost and there is no going back. No redrawing of borders to 1967 levels, nothing. This two state mess is what perpetuates the anger and hatred. Let it go already.
Would you ever give up or would you rather die defending your country and your family? If not, how can you expect it of them.
ƒ³
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

At what point did I "spit on my soldiers"?

Dilbert_X wrote:

I like this quote

"In all the human societies we have ever reviewed, in every age and in every state, there has seldom if ever been a shortage of eager young males prepared to kill and die to preserve the security, comfort and prejudices of their elders, and what you call heroism is just an expression of this fact; there is never a scarcity of idiots." Iain Banks

Like I said, you like your 'liberty' and don't care that "the man" stomps on everyone elses just so long as gas prices are low and beef is cheap.
As long as he's on your side you like it, when another starts getting bigger and looking like a threat you guys wail like babies for your Daddy to go smack the other.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2011-02-21 18:53:04)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

oug wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

The Palestinians simply need to recognize that they've lost and there is no going back. No redrawing of borders to 1967 levels, nothing. This two state mess is what perpetuates the anger and hatred. Let it go already.
Would you ever give up or would you rather die defending your country and your family? If not, how can you expect it of them.
Why does it matter? It's just a name. Israeli, Palestinian, does it matter at the end of the day? If Mexico decided to invade the US tomorrow would I fight to defend my country? Sure. But if the war was over and we'd lost I would learn Spanish and go about my business.

Don't you deride nationalism? Why are you feeding into theirs and sustaining it with false hope? They've been conquered in all but name and should do the rational thing: learn Hebrew. Instead, they fight on and the romantics and bleeding hearts of the world look askance at Israel as if it was some sort of Stalinistic tyranny. It's not. The Israelies want the bullshit over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't want to conduct purges or systematically wipe out the Palestinians. The very idea is ludicrous. Do you think they enjoy being conscripted to serve in the IDF or do you think they'd rather be able to live their lives like every other western style nation where the college aged kids go off to school and rebel against their parents like normal people?

The hardliners on both sides are the problem. It's not "Israel is evil" or "Palestinians are Arabs so fuck them". Palestine should've been a lost cause decades ago but instead they refuse to give up and then go "Why me? What did I do wrong?". Neither side is innocent so sitting back thousands of miles away and taking sides is ridiculous. If they want to keep fighting they will. If they decide enough is enough then one day that will be the end result. Passing UN resolutions and the like is just laughable though, especially when the "genocide of Gaza" i.e. the embargo would've been the natural response (or worse) of every nation that signed the damned thing if they came under repeated rocket attacks and suicide bombings from a noisy neighbor.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2011-02-21 19:04:42)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6370|what

JohnG@lt wrote:

The Israelies want the bullshit over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't want to conduct purges or systematically wipe out the Palestinians. The very idea is ludicrous. Do you think they enjoy being conscripted to serve in the IDF or do you think they'd rather be able to live their lives like every other western style nation where the college aged kids go off to school and rebel against their parents like normal people?
You don't know much about Zionism, do you?
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

AussieReaper wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

The Israelies want the bullshit over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't want to conduct purges or systematically wipe out the Palestinians. The very idea is ludicrous. Do you think they enjoy being conscripted to serve in the IDF or do you think they'd rather be able to live their lives like every other western style nation where the college aged kids go off to school and rebel against their parents like normal people?
You don't know much about Zionism, do you?
I know that it makes up a minority of Israelies beliefs. It's like saying Tea Partiers or Neo-Cons or Communists or White Supremacists are representative of America.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2011-02-21 19:12:43)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6370|what

JohnG@lt wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

The Israelies want the bullshit over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't want to conduct purges or systematically wipe out the Palestinians. The very idea is ludicrous. Do you think they enjoy being conscripted to serve in the IDF or do you think they'd rather be able to live their lives like every other western style nation where the college aged kids go off to school and rebel against their parents like normal people?
You don't know much about Zionism, do you?
I know that it makes up a minority of Israelies beliefs. It's like saying Tea Partiers or Neo-Cons or Communists or White Supremacists are representative of America.
Yeah, it must be the minority that are tearing down palestinian settlements and building their own? No, it's the Israeli government that is doing that - based on Zionistic beliefs. Promised land and land that is there for the taking apparently...

They wouldn't be doing this otherwise. And you'll often hear Jews outside of Israel condemn it.

And you argue that to see this from a humanitarian perspective I'm a bleeding heart liberal. As if empathy is to be frowned upon.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

AussieReaper wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

You don't know much about Zionism, do you?
I know that it makes up a minority of Israelies beliefs. It's like saying Tea Partiers or Neo-Cons or Communists or White Supremacists are representative of America.
Yeah, it must be the minority that are tearing down palestinian settlements and building their own? No, it's the Israeli government that is doing that - based on Zionistic beliefs. Promised land and land that is there for the taking apparently...

They wouldn't be doing this otherwise. And you'll often hear Jews outside of Israel condemn it.

And you argue that to see this from a humanitarian perspective I'm a bleeding heart liberal. As if empathy is to be frowned upon.
Empathy at the expense of reason? Absolutely.

And unless you've had your house torn down and a settlement of another religions members built on it, you mean sympathy, not empathy.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2011-02-21 20:03:24)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6818|132 and Bush

Dilbert_X wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:


There's no need to invade Israel, just boot them out of Palestine - and I would support it, much more so than Afghanistan or Iraq or Vietnam or Korea...
Oh, and how do you propose they get booted out of Palestine?
Give them 48 hours to leave and then start bombing.

Works on arabs.
How about you just put them on box cars and send them to an undisclosed location?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6323|eXtreme to the maX

Kmar wrote:

How about you just put them on box cars and send them to an undisclosed location?
I don't think thats necessary, at this stage
All we're asking is they stay within their recognised borders, something we've had to remind the Germans about a few times now.

Anyway, box-cars are so last century - technology has moved on, a little rejigging and this should work fine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_bioweapon

Poetic that the Israelis have laid the foundations
Fuck Israel
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6869|USA

oug wrote:

lowing wrote:

oug wrote:


I'm sure it would be enough to calm everyone down, yes. Maybe not everyone straight away, but sure enough things would smooth over in time.
and yet the Arab and Islamic nations massed in force to attack Israel on the very borders you claim will "calm everyone down" now. How is it you believe that?
Clearly back then they had different expectations as to how this whole thing could turn out for them, and I think it's fair to say that even the most pessimistic couldn't have foreseen the present situation. I'm sure many will argue that even the '67 proposed boarders are unfair for the Palestinians, and in the event that they were to be enforced, they would seek an even bigger cut. But even that prospect is surely more desirable and cannot be compared to the massacre we are whitnessing today.
If we can all agree that if the '67 borders will not bring peace to the ME due to the Islamic determination and stated objective of the destruction of Israel, why should Israel relent? It is a war and they are winning it. A war that, if they lost, would result in their destruction. Yet you want Israel to give any advantage they have in this war to make it easier for their enemies to destroy them. How can you demand that of anyone? and how can you condemn anyone for not doing it.

Hell, even I don't expect the Islamic terrorists to just lay down and let us kill them. Yet that is what you want Israel to do. The UN would not be there to help, nor would the US in your wishes.

I would rather have a Jewish state over yet another radical Islamic state thank you.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6892|Canberra, AUS

JohnG@lt wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


I know that it makes up a minority of Israelies beliefs. It's like saying Tea Partiers or Neo-Cons or Communists or White Supremacists are representative of America.
Yeah, it must be the minority that are tearing down palestinian settlements and building their own? No, it's the Israeli government that is doing that - based on Zionistic beliefs. Promised land and land that is there for the taking apparently...

They wouldn't be doing this otherwise. And you'll often hear Jews outside of Israel condemn it.

And you argue that to see this from a humanitarian perspective I'm a bleeding heart liberal. As if empathy is to be frowned upon.
Empathy at the expense of reason? Absolutely.

And unless you've had your house torn down and a settlement of another religions members built on it, you mean sympathy, not empathy.
shit not this debate again
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6323|eXtreme to the maX

lowing wrote:

If we can all agree that if the '67 borders will not bring peace to the ME due to the Islamic determination and stated objective of the destruction of Israel, why should Israel relent? It is a war and they are winning it. A war that, if they lost, would result in their destruction. Yet you want Israel to give any advantage they have in this war to make it easier for their enemies to destroy them. How can you demand that of anyone? and how can you condemn anyone for not doing it.

Hell, even I don't expect the Islamic terrorists to just lay down and let us kill them. Yet that is what you want Israel to do. The UN would not be there to help, nor would the US in your wishes.

I would rather have a Jewish state over yet another radical Islamic state thank you.
You do twist and exaggerate.

No-one is asking for Israel to lie down and be killed, if they went back to their '67 borders the UN would be there to help, no doubt led by the US and supported by what are currently relatively benign middle-eastern governments. The radicals would be marginalised.
In an age of long range nerve weapon and nuclear tipped missiles as opposed to tank-tank and artillery-artillery battles giving up a few miles here and there would make no difference whatever to Israel's survivability in any future war, but would make war far less likely.

Really Israel should have made an effort to make peace a decade or two ago when they were in a position of reasonable strength and were on reasonable terms with relatively stable surrounding countries.

The future they are facing now is they could be fully surrounded by radical Islamic countries with unstable populist governments which would have no interest in reasonable negotiation.
Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran - The US would barely be able to defend or resupply Israel if they went radical, and if China got twitchy about their oil supplies that could get interesting.
Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

lowing wrote:

oug wrote:

lowing wrote:


and yet the Arab and Islamic nations massed in force to attack Israel on the very borders you claim will "calm everyone down" now. How is it you believe that?
Clearly back then they had different expectations as to how this whole thing could turn out for them, and I think it's fair to say that even the most pessimistic couldn't have foreseen the present situation. I'm sure many will argue that even the '67 proposed boarders are unfair for the Palestinians, and in the event that they were to be enforced, they would seek an even bigger cut. But even that prospect is surely more desirable and cannot be compared to the massacre we are whitnessing today.
If we can all agree that if the '67 borders will not bring peace to the ME due to the Islamic determination and stated objective of the destruction of Israel, why should Israel relent? It is a war and they are winning it. A war that, if they lost, would result in their destruction. Yet you want Israel to give any advantage they have in this war to make it easier for their enemies to destroy them. How can you demand that of anyone? and how can you condemn anyone for not doing it.

Hell, even I don't expect the Islamic terrorists to just lay down and let us kill them. Yet that is what you want Israel to do. The UN would not be there to help, nor would the US in your wishes.

I would rather have a Jewish state over yet another radical Islamic state thank you.
Man, I had finally shut him up and you get him going again. Sheesh.

Don't walk into his arguments. They're irrelevant and he doesn't really care. Just point out the fact that he has no plan and he's not willing to personally do anything to help thus the entire basis for his argument is groundless.

Borders returned to 1967 levels and the fighting continues? What now?
https://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKg9Zj7zpMIJIzPKURERa1-nvQNDX0FVNqq9OLt3yLAvE7st4NHw&t=1
"I rruuuu roh"

Palestinians get what they want and commence ethnic cleansing? What now?
https://www.nws.cc/i-dunno-lol.jpg


He's a run-of-the-mill causehead that doesn't actually care about his cause or the consequences thereof. Stop arguing with him about it. All you're doing is making him feel good about himself because it lets him feel that he's done his part to raise awareness.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6737|Πάϊ

lowing wrote:

If we can all agree that if the '67 borders will not bring peace to the ME due to the Islamic determination and stated objective of the destruction of Israel, why should Israel relent? It is a war and they are winning it. A war that, if they lost, would result in their destruction. Yet you want Israel to give any advantage they have in this war to make it easier for their enemies to destroy them. How can you demand that of anyone? and how can you condemn anyone for not doing it.

Hell, even I don't expect the Islamic terrorists to just lay down and let us kill them. Yet that is what you want Israel to do. The UN would not be there to help, nor would the US in your wishes.

I would rather have a Jewish state over yet another radical Islamic state thank you.
I don't think it would result in Israel's destruction. What makes you say that anyway? Like I said before, maybe not everyone would be totally satisfied by the '67 boarders, and thus some turmoil might ensue, but all in all I think if the Palestinians had a viable environment within which to flourish as a people, in the long run things would be a lot mellower. Atm the Palestinians have no choice but to fight to the death. They have nothing to lose. Were they to be given a choice, I'm convinced most of them would prefer the peaceful way.

And btw, let's not confuse the Palestinians with islamic terrorism. Sure enough fundamentalism has found a breeding ground among those who have lost all hope for a decent life. But their fight is for the most part defined in national terms.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Man, I had finally shut him up and you get him going again. Sheesh.

Don't walk into his arguments. They're irrelevant and he doesn't really care. Just point out the fact that he has no plan and he's not willing to personally do anything to help thus the entire basis for his argument is groundless.
You'd shut me up? Wow, someone's full of himself...
What's irrelevant is your physics problems and your funny pictures. So spare us the crap and please explain your plan and why my argument is groundless. Personal attacks won't work any more.
And for the record if I were trying to raise awareness I'm sure there are better places to do it than here! After all this subject has been discussed countless times before, with countless undeniable points having been raised against Israeli policy, none of which has rubbed off even to the slightest degree on its defenders, who insist on repeating the same poem over and over while covering their ears to avoid recognizing the obvious.
ƒ³
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6688

JohnG@lt wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


I know that it makes up a minority of Israelies beliefs. It's like saying Tea Partiers or Neo-Cons or Communists or White Supremacists are representative of America.
Yeah, it must be the minority that are tearing down palestinian settlements and building their own? No, it's the Israeli government that is doing that - based on Zionistic beliefs. Promised land and land that is there for the taking apparently...

They wouldn't be doing this otherwise. And you'll often hear Jews outside of Israel condemn it.

And you argue that to see this from a humanitarian perspective I'm a bleeding heart liberal. As if empathy is to be frowned upon.
Empathy at the expense of reason? Absolutely.

And unless you've had your house torn down and a settlement of another religions members built on it, you mean sympathy, not empathy.
you've got sympathy and empathy the wrong way around...

oh and the jewish government are ideologically zionist - that's the whole point of its formation and existence!

but yes you are right, there are hardcore conservative zionists too that make even the government seem moderate... akin to tea-partiers.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6869|USA

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

If we can all agree that if the '67 borders will not bring peace to the ME due to the Islamic determination and stated objective of the destruction of Israel, why should Israel relent? It is a war and they are winning it. A war that, if they lost, would result in their destruction. Yet you want Israel to give any advantage they have in this war to make it easier for their enemies to destroy them. How can you demand that of anyone? and how can you condemn anyone for not doing it.

Hell, even I don't expect the Islamic terrorists to just lay down and let us kill them. Yet that is what you want Israel to do. The UN would not be there to help, nor would the US in your wishes.

I would rather have a Jewish state over yet another radical Islamic state thank you.
You do twist and exaggerate.

No-one is asking for Israel to lie down and be killed, if they went back to their '67 borders the UN would be there to help, no doubt led by the US and supported by what are currently relatively benign middle-eastern governments. The radicals would be marginalised.
In an age of long range nerve weapon and nuclear tipped missiles as opposed to tank-tank and artillery-artillery battles giving up a few miles here and there would make no difference whatever to Israel's survivability in any future war, but would make war far less likely.

Really Israel should have made an effort to make peace a decade or two ago when they were in a position of reasonable strength and were on reasonable terms with relatively stable surrounding countries.

The future they are facing now is they could be fully surrounded by radical Islamic countries with unstable populist governments which would have no interest in reasonable negotiation.
Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran - The US would barely be able to defend or resupply Israel if they went radical, and if China got twitchy about their oil supplies that could get interesting.
But the most important point is, '67 borders will not do shit for peace. and what is the UN gunna do, support Israel? right, with what? a dreaded resolution? Not hardly.

Add to it, the very real probability that the second the Palestinians make peace with Israel, they will inherit another enemy, Islamic radicals and their cast of supporting actors. I wonder how that "few" argument will play out then?

Last edited by lowing (2011-02-22 09:13:42)

Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

oug wrote:

lowing wrote:

If we can all agree that if the '67 borders will not bring peace to the ME due to the Islamic determination and stated objective of the destruction of Israel, why should Israel relent? It is a war and they are winning it. A war that, if they lost, would result in their destruction. Yet you want Israel to give any advantage they have in this war to make it easier for their enemies to destroy them. How can you demand that of anyone? and how can you condemn anyone for not doing it.

Hell, even I don't expect the Islamic terrorists to just lay down and let us kill them. Yet that is what you want Israel to do. The UN would not be there to help, nor would the US in your wishes.

I would rather have a Jewish state over yet another radical Islamic state thank you.
I don't think it would result in Israel's destruction. What makes you say that anyway? Like I said before, maybe not everyone would be totally satisfied by the '67 boarders, and thus some turmoil might ensue, but all in all I think if the Palestinians had a viable environment within which to flourish as a people, in the long run things would be a lot mellower. Atm the Palestinians have no choice but to fight to the death. They have nothing to lose. Were they to be given a choice, I'm convinced most of them would prefer the peaceful way.

And btw, let's not confuse the Palestinians with islamic terrorism. Sure enough fundamentalism has found a breeding ground among those who have lost all hope for a decent life. But their fight is for the most part defined in national terms.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Man, I had finally shut him up and you get him going again. Sheesh.

Don't walk into his arguments. They're irrelevant and he doesn't really care. Just point out the fact that he has no plan and he's not willing to personally do anything to help thus the entire basis for his argument is groundless.
You'd shut me up? Wow, someone's full of himself...
What's irrelevant is your physics problems and your funny pictures. So spare us the crap and please explain your plan and why my argument is groundless. Personal attacks won't work any more.
And for the record if I were trying to raise awareness I'm sure there are better places to do it than here! After all this subject has been discussed countless times before, with countless undeniable points having been raised against Israeli policy, none of which has rubbed off even to the slightest degree on its defenders, who insist on repeating the same poem over and over while covering their ears to avoid recognizing the obvious.
I already said it twice. You ignored me because it was more logical than your own arguments.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6799|SE London

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

LOL OK...

Then the UN resolutions legitimising Israel are also a fiction.
Sure. It was British territory and they could do with it as they saw fit without the UN in the first place.
No, it was a League of Nations mandate administered by Britain. Not British territory at all.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

before people realize that Arabs in the region really dislike Jews enough to want to kill them
Where do you get this stuff from?

There was no issue between Arabs and Jews prior to Zionism - the idea that Arabs were untermensch and must make way or be exterminated  for the lebensraum of the Jewish master-race.
Oh right. Did they kick them off their land at gun point? Or did they live peaceably until they were invaded? The answer is B.
No, the answer is A. They did kick them out of their homes at gun point and continue to do so to this day.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

I don't get it, the Jews are entitled to be pissed that the Germans tried to clear them out, the Palestinians must lie down and take it?
I wasn't aware that the Palestinians were facing extermination. Could it be that actions have consequences? Perhaps electing Hamas to represent them wasn't the best decision? Fucking Jews fault amirite?
Weren't you? So the fact the bulk of the population have been completely displaced from Palestine and live in refugee camps didn't give you a clue?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard