If your getting that at VH with a minimum of 4x AA, I'm going to punch you in the face.Finray wrote:
not enjoyable at 27 FPS
0xAA bro.
Ultra High with night config though, also on 1280x1024.
Ultra High with night config though, also on 1280x1024.
Oh!
27 FPS isn't even that bad, still playable. I think people get spoilt when they play games at a constant 60fps, then they can't accept anything lower. It only ever ends up hurting them anyway. That and not being able to accept not playing on the best settings. It's like, don't fucking complain about performance if you're a cheap arsed cunt who can't afford the very best gear and also refuses to lower the settings or reduce the resolution. Jeez.
I can understand that some games are abit poorly optimised, but it's more of a mental problem than hardware or software, when it comes to certain people. IMO.
I can understand that some games are abit poorly optimised, but it's more of a mental problem than hardware or software, when it comes to certain people. IMO.
LOLMekstizzle wrote:
a bit poorly optimised.
A BIT?
To be fair it's still probably the best looking game out there, which is abit fucked up really.
asd
6/f/singaporeMiggle wrote:
asd
These screenshots make me think of John Travolta, dreadlocks and Battlefield Earth.
I liked the nano suit too. I just haven't gotten a chance to finish the game.RTHKI wrote:
No, I also liked the gameplay... Gauss rifleSisco10 wrote:
Am I the only one who thought the gameplay was good? I really enjoyed playing with the Nano suitunnamednewbie13 wrote:
I actually enjoyed the stealth elements, but I haven't played through the whole thing.
You should give it another try, it´s well worth it.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
These screenshots make me think of John Travolta, dreadlocks and Battlefield Earth.I liked the nano suit too. I just haven't gotten a chance to finish the game.RTHKI wrote:
No, I also liked the gameplay... Gauss rifleSisco10 wrote:
Am I the only one who thought the gameplay was good? I really enjoyed playing with the Nano suit
300gb laptop drive is fail when it's already filled with your regular titles.Sisco10 wrote:
You should give it another try, it´s well worth it.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
These screenshots make me think of John Travolta, dreadlocks and Battlefield Earth.I liked the nano suit too. I just haven't gotten a chance to finish the game.RTHKI wrote:
No, I also liked the gameplay... Gauss rifle
Stillunnamednewbie13 wrote:
300gb laptop drive is fail when it's already filled with your regular titles.Sisco10 wrote:
You should give it another try, it´s well worth it.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
These screenshots make me think of John Travolta, dreadlocks and Battlefield Earth.
I liked the nano suit too. I just haven't gotten a chance to finish the game.
Nope, I loved the gameplay. One of my favorite games to date. I just hope they keep the PC version as good as the previous version when it comes to weapon handling and such. ie: One key does one thing, not one key for 5 different things depending on situation and always ends up being the wrong thing.Sisco10 wrote:
Am I the only one who thought the gameplay was good? I really enjoyed playing with the Nano suitunnamednewbie13 wrote:
I actually enjoyed the stealth elements, but I haven't played through the whole thing.AussieReaper wrote:
I was talking about the terribad gameplay.
It looks like you're fighting your own guys. Although I did read that you're not actually supposed to have the new nanosuit, or something like that.
Looks rather awsm though, even if I'd prefer the jungle to the city.
Looks rather awsm though, even if I'd prefer the jungle to the city.
How far you guys think SLi 260's will go graphics wise in this one? I still wish I could play this one on max someday.
"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"
agreed, played the demo of the first one, it was just terrible. Guns had no weight and the enemy could see you from about 5 miles away behind a rock. It was just poopAussieReaper wrote:
I was talking about the terribad gameplay.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It isn't that bad of a game. It's just hard for a lot of computers to play on full detail.AussieReaper wrote:
I could post pics of Crysis and you'd think omg awesome.
Then you play the game and no amount of gfx can save how bad it is.
Demo =/= real game.bennisboy wrote:
agreed, played the demo of the first one, it was just terrible. Guns had no weight and the enemy could see you from about 5 miles away behind a rock. It was just poopAussieReaper wrote:
I was talking about the terribad gameplay.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It isn't that bad of a game. It's just hard for a lot of computers to play on full detail.
Played the full game on the hard and delta settings. The enemies were tough yes, but they did not have xray or super vision. It was easy to get the drop on them, you just had to keep an eye on your surroundings.
SLied 260s will run it maxed out...The requirements on this thing is going to be lower than the first if anything, since the consoles need to be able to run it.Blade4509 wrote:
How far you guys think SLi 260's will go graphics wise in this one? I still wish I could play this one on max someday.
Although, since they already have a solid PC engine to work off, maybe the consoles will get a PC port?
Consoles are getting Crysis Engine 1.5, PCs are getting the fully-fledged 2.0.Sydney wrote:
SLied 260s will run it maxed out...The requirements on this thing is going to be lower than the first if anything, since the consoles need to be able to run it.Blade4509 wrote:
How far you guys think SLi 260's will go graphics wise in this one? I still wish I could play this one on max someday.
Although, since they already have a solid PC engine to work off, maybe the consoles will get a PC port?
WinFinray wrote:
Consoles are getting Crysis Engine 1.5, PCs are getting the fully-fledged 2.0.Sydney wrote:
SLied 260s will run it maxed out...The requirements on this thing is going to be lower than the first if anything, since the consoles need to be able to run it.Blade4509 wrote:
How far you guys think SLi 260's will go graphics wise in this one? I still wish I could play this one on max someday.
Although, since they already have a solid PC engine to work off, maybe the consoles will get a PC port?
It also took a shitload of bullet to take someone down.bennisboy wrote:
agreed, played the demo of the first one, it was just terrible. Guns had no weight and the enemy could see you from about 5 miles away behind a rock. It was just poopAussieReaper wrote:
I was talking about the terribad gameplay.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It isn't that bad of a game. It's just hard for a lot of computers to play on full detail.
One to the head.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
It also took a shitload of bullet to take someone down.bennisboy wrote:
agreed, played the demo of the first one, it was just terrible. Guns had no weight and the enemy could see you from about 5 miles away behind a rock. It was just poopAussieReaper wrote:
I was talking about the terribad gameplay.
4-5 to the kevlar west of normal soldiers
A bunch to the nano suit guys assuming you don't EMP them first.
Thats Warhead, original Crysis it would take 10-15 to the chest, or 2 shots to the head with guys that have helmets.Sydney wrote:
One to the head.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
It also took a shitload of bullet to take someone down.bennisboy wrote:
agreed, played the demo of the first one, it was just terrible. Guns had no weight and the enemy could see you from about 5 miles away behind a rock. It was just poop
4-5 to the kevlar west of normal soldiers
A bunch to the nano suit guys assuming you don't EMP them first.
New Trailer.
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/the-w … is-2/64319
looks like the US is getting invaded alot recently.
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/the-w … is-2/64319
looks like the US is getting invaded alot recently.
Last edited by aerodynamic (2010-04-09 09:49:05)
Cool.