BF2S Forums CoD6 First In Game Footage

I was waiting for this.

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

ok that looks incredible.

why can't treyarch just give up ffs, iw beat them on every single release.

Tbh its a good thing, Activision want a Call of Duty released every year, if one company (IW) was to do this then all the game would be mediocre because they don;t have as much time to work on them. This was, having a treyarch release every 2nd year (or so) gives IW to make their games even better ... Also if treyarch continue the tradition of using aspects of IW's CODs (like WAW) then that could be good as well.

Game looks pretty good, but then again almost anyone can make a snassy trailer

this

a spirit of friendly competition between the two studios makes for better games

S.Lythberg wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

ok that looks incredible.

why can't treyarch just give up ffs, iw beat them on every single release.

Tbh its a good thing, Activision want a Call of Duty released every year, if one company (IW) was to do this then all the game would be mediocre because they don;t have as much time to work on them. This was, having a treyarch release every 2nd year (or so) gives IW to make their games even better ... Also if treyarch continue the tradition of using aspects of IW's CODs (like WAW) then that could be good as well.

Game looks pretty good, but then again almost anyone can make a snassy trailer

this

a spirit of friendly competition between the two studios makes for better games

And how's that then?

Notice that the 2 best in the series are made by IW and the 2 worst are made by Treyarch.

Mint Sauce wrote:

S.Lythberg wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Tbh its a good thing, Activision want a Call of Duty released every year, if one company (IW) was to do this then all the game would be mediocre because they don;t have as much time to work on them. This was, having a treyarch release every 2nd year (or so) gives IW to make their games even better ... Also if treyarch continue the tradition of using aspects of IW's CODs (like WAW) then that could be good as well.

Game looks pretty good, but then again almost anyone can make a snassy trailer

this

a spirit of friendly competition between the two studios makes for better games

And how's that then?

Notice that the 2 best in the series are made by IW and the 2 worst are made by Treyarch.

Although thats completely subjective, I must say I actually enjoyed cod5 more than cod4 (mainly the multiplayer, singleplayer on both has very little replyability so..)

Generally IW do make far better CODs than Treyarch, but as I said, if treyarch continue the current trend I think it could work quite nicely.

Mint Sauce wrote:

S.Lythberg wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Tbh its a good thing, Activision want a Call of Duty released every year, if one company (IW) was to do this then all the game would be mediocre because they don;t have as much time to work on them. This was, having a treyarch release every 2nd year (or so) gives IW to make their games even better ... Also if treyarch continue the tradition of using aspects of IW's CODs (like WAW) then that could be good as well.

Game looks pretty good, but then again almost anyone can make a snassy trailer

this

a spirit of friendly competition between the two studios makes for better games

And how's that then?

Notice that the 2 best in the series are made by IW and the 2 worst are made by Treyarch.

I thought 5 was great.  bandwagon much?

Finray wrote:

S.Lythberg wrote:

Mint Sauce wrote:

And how's that then?

Notice that the 2 best in the series are made by IW and the 2 worst are made by Treyarch.

I thought 5 was great.  bandwagon much?

It was good, but 2 + 4 > 3 + 5.

well then worst is relative, it's still better than 95% of the games out there

Bradt3hleader wrote:

WaW rocks GTFO

no but the SP failed...


/offtopic Anybody know where I can download the English localization files for both COD4 and COD5 plz?

I'll up them for you.

For a blowjob.

War Man wrote:

Who wants to bet there will be huge competition between BC2 and MW2?

not me, MW2 will destroy BC2. Perhaps not in gameplay, as I don't have high hopes for either, but CoD4 was much more popular than BC1.

The A W S M F O X wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Why would they bring the AC-130 mission back, that was the most boring mission in any CoD game ever. Even worse than the British dam mission in CoD1.

that was the best mission in the game faggit

I don't get why people liked it so much...

It was one of the most boring missions of any game I've ever played, you do practically nothing. It felt like you could sit and watch and still win, there was never any danger of being shot or dying. It went on too long and had no action whatsoever, there was no sense of accomplishment, and it didn't fit with the rest of the game at all.

I liked the first sniper mission and mile high club, the rest was mediocre.

Poseidon wrote:

Miggle wrote:

War Man wrote:

Who wants to bet there will be huge competition between BC2 and MW2?

not me, MW2 will destroy BC2. Perhaps not in gameplay, as I don't have high hopes for either, but CoD4 was much more popular than BC1.

The A W S M F O X wrote:

that was the best mission in the game faggit

I don't get why people liked it so much...

It was one of the most boring missions of any game I've ever played, you do practically nothing. It felt like you could sit and watch and still win, there was never any danger of being shot or dying. It went on too long and had no action whatsoever, there was no sense of accomplishment, and it didn't fit with the rest of the game at all.

I liked the first sniper mission and mile high club, the rest was mediocre.

you clearly don't have a grasp on why the mission was put into the game/why people enjoy it

enlighten me.

Poseidon wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

you clearly don't have a grasp on why the mission was put into the game/why people enjoy it

enlighten me.

you've never seen any of the thermal videos from Iraq/Afghanistan of AC-130's/Apache's taking down insurgents?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuT0z2Ua … re=related

I have...

Is that supposed to make that fun and exciting? How about MW2 has a level where I decapitate an innocent U.S. citizen, I've seen that too.

Poseidon wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

you've never seen any of the thermal videos from Iraq/Afghanistan of AC-130's/Apache's taking down insurgents?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuT0z2Ua … re=related

I have...

Is that supposed to make that fun and exciting? How about MW2 has a level where I decapitate an innocent U.S. citizen, I've seen that too.

it's not supposed to be some fast paced, high intensity mission, that's the point

it's supposed to have a "cool" factor and allow people to step into the shoes of the people in that video (the ones not on the recieving end, atleast)...

not all video games have to be fast paced and have constant intensity, being an MGS4 fan you should know that

But that was what cod4 was, up until that point. It didn't fit with the rest of the game at all.

If I wanted a calm, quiet game I would play something else.

I don't really care about being an AC130 gunner, not that I don't enjoy being a Plane Gunner, games that allow you to gun in WWII bombers tend to be more fast paced, intense, and enjoyable.

Poseidon wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

it's not supposed to be some fast paced, high intensity mission, that's the point

it's supposed to have a "cool" factor and allow people to step into the shoes of the people in that video (the ones not on the recieving end, atleast)...

not all video games have to be fast paced and have constant intensity, being an MGS4 fan you should know that

But that was what cod4 was, up until that point. It didn't fit with the rest of the game at all.

If I wanted a calm, quiet game I would play something else.

I don't really care about being an AC130 gunner, not that I don't enjoy being a Plane Gunner, games that allow you to gun in WWII bombers tend to be more fast paced, intense, and enjoyable.

Oh yeah, I must've forgotten that one mission = the whole game being calm and quiet

again, why did you love MGS4 so much then with it's extremely long cutscenes? makes no sense, but then again we've come to expect that from you now haven't we

I never said that the whole game was calm, in fact I said it didn't fit with the rest of the game, which was largely action.

I also never said I don't like calm games, I merely said CoD4 wasn't one.

And I don't love MGS4 so much, I played through it once and haven't touched it since. I enjoyed the plot, which is why the cutscenes were enjoyable.

Why can't you ever keep a debate to the debate, does it always have to go personal?

Last edited by Miggle (2009-05-19 14:49:09)

The funny thing about watching Miggle and Poseidon argue is the Miggle is always right, but Poseidon comes off as less of a pretentious dick so in the end they both lose.