noContraz wrote:
Wait, since when was Countdown a good Cod4 map? Shoulda said... Strike / Vacant / Crossfire / k sorry, had to >_<Mint Sauce wrote:
Maps - CoD4 has a couple of really good maps, like Strike and Countdown.
I love it, M40A3 or AK47 can dominate an entire server.Miggle wrote:
I fucking hate countdown.
#rekt
what is it with you and the ak47? You know it performs worse with a silencer? lolMint Sauce wrote:
I love it, M40A3 or AK47 can dominate an entire server.Miggle wrote:
I fucking hate countdown.
So do all guns?TheAussieReaper wrote:
what is it with you and the ak47? You know it performs worse with a silencer? lolMint Sauce wrote:
I love it, M40A3 or AK47 can dominate an entire server.Miggle wrote:
I fucking hate countdown.
But yes, I know what you're saying, the AK's raw damage statistic is impeded by ANY weapon mod. That's just how pimpin' that weapon is.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
That's why I use it with nothing on it..TheAussieReaper wrote:
what is it with you and the ak47? You know it performs worse with a silencer? lolMint Sauce wrote:
I love it, M40A3 or AK47 can dominate an entire server.Miggle wrote:
I fucking hate countdown.
silly aussie
#rekt
I agree mostly.
thank you for your summary. i value your opinion and will take it into consideration.
wtfusmarine wrote:
thank you for your summary. i value your opinion and will take it into consideration.
no you wontusmarine wrote:
thank you for your summary. i value your opinion and will take it into consideration.
Karma wrote:
terrible. marine
#rekt
i value your opinion and will take it into consideration.Mekstizzle wrote:
wtfusmarine wrote:
thank you for your summary. i value your opinion and will take it into consideration.
I may have only played the cod 5 mp beta on the console, but let me tell you that your comparisons suck balls mint.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Ok War Man, lets go back and read what I wrote at the beginning, it's my opinion.War Man wrote:
I may have only played the cod 5 mp beta on the console, but let me tell you that your comparisons suck balls mint.
Redneck.
#rekt
If I was a redneck I would have a different attitude. Also, even if it's your opinion that doesn't mean I can't criticize you.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
my thoughts exactly after reading mints crap...War Man wrote:
I may have only played the cod 5 mp beta on the console, but let me tell you that your comparisons suck balls mint.
The CoD: 4 fanboy is pissed that CoD:4 won? The fuck is going on?specialistx2324 wrote:
my thoughts exactly after reading mints crap...War Man wrote:
I may have only played the cod 5 mp beta on the console, but let me tell you that your comparisons suck balls mint.
he thinks both games are perfect, and therefore, the idea that mint found any flaws in them is not just incorrect, but blasphemous.TopHat01 wrote:
The CoD: 4 fanboy is pissed that CoD:4 won? The fuck is going on?specialistx2324 wrote:
my thoughts exactly after reading mints crap...War Man wrote:
I may have only played the cod 5 mp beta on the console, but let me tell you that your comparisons suck balls mint.
I like them both. I tried to rank up to fast in CoD5 though and I'm at level 37 so I'm burnt out for a while. I might take a week off from playing it and play it later.
I SAID THAT COD:4 WAS BETTER YOU FUCKING IDIOT.specialistx2324 wrote:
my thoughts exactly after reading mints crap...War Man wrote:
I may have only played the cod 5 mp beta on the console, but let me tell you that your comparisons suck balls mint.
And War Man, I did say that it was my opinion, and feel free to criticise, but saying it's all utter crap isn't really constructive is it?
#rekt
^thisspecialistx2324 wrote:
my thoughts exactly after reading mints crap...War Man wrote:
I may have only played the cod 5 mp beta on the console, but let me tell you that your comparisons suck balls mint.
I have played both and I must say your comparisons are top notch mint.
so, in essence, cod4 > cod5? lol
I'm a CoD veteran. Started playing UO way back in the days of CoD1. Every other CoD since the first has been shittier. CoD5 comes in a close second imo.
ps - I got nothing wrong with someone saying such and such is better than such and such. But I stopped reading after 3 or 4 paragraphs because they all basically say "4 was this, and it was cool, while 5 is for noobs and sucks compared to 4".
In case no ones noticed, every CoD has been very similar in gameplay and graphics compared to all the others. I personally don't think its a bad thing. But the bottomline is that they really aren't that different. Thats ok though. Dont fix what isnt broke.
I'm a CoD veteran. Started playing UO way back in the days of CoD1. Every other CoD since the first has been shittier. CoD5 comes in a close second imo.
ps - I got nothing wrong with someone saying such and such is better than such and such. But I stopped reading after 3 or 4 paragraphs because they all basically say "4 was this, and it was cool, while 5 is for noobs and sucks compared to 4".
In case no ones noticed, every CoD has been very similar in gameplay and graphics compared to all the others. I personally don't think its a bad thing. But the bottomline is that they really aren't that different. Thats ok though. Dont fix what isnt broke.
Last edited by Spearhead (2008-11-29 14:25:19)
I liked the sp of cod4 but i never played it on the internet. I still dont played cod5, only saw videos of it.
Thank you that you shared your thoughts!
+1
Thank you that you shared your thoughts!
+1
UO noob =/= "CoD veteran".Spearhead wrote:
so, in essence, cod4 > cod5? lol
I'm a CoD veteran. Started playing UO way back in the days of CoD1. Every other CoD since the first has been shittier. CoD5 comes in a close second imo.
ps - I got nothing wrong with someone saying such and such is better than such and such. But I stopped reading after 3 or 4 paragraphs because they all basically say "4 was this, and it was cool, while 5 is for noobs and sucks compared to 4".
In case no ones noticed, every CoD has been very similar in gameplay and graphics compared to all the others. I personally don't think its a bad thing. But the bottomline is that they really aren't that different. Thats ok though. Dont fix what isnt broke.
You need to come back to ^ABC^ days of pre-patch rifle only CoD1, then talk about veterancy.
<--- Is cool.
All the new CoD4/CoD5 games are ball-licking abortions; console-shite made for a diluted FPS audience that want easy shoot 'em up action over skillful FPS competition. They're crap, and the only reason CoD4 enjoyed its (short and mediocre) league-success is because all of the sponsorships and companies were so quick to endorse it and herald it as the 'next big title'. At the moment the competitive CoD community are like a crowd of lost wandering rangers though- there's even talks of reviving and purposefully bringing back Call of Duty 2 .
Last edited by Uzique (2008-11-29 14:48:45)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
well okay then. but you still agree with some of my observations, it appears?
I agree, tho, the CoDs made for consoles have been console shite and diluted. UO imo is still the best. so suck it.
I agree, tho, the CoDs made for consoles have been console shite and diluted. UO imo is still the best. so suck it.
Haha, I love the casual rivalry between CoD-oldschool and CoD-UO, it exists for no reason whatsoeverSpearhead wrote:
well okay then. but you still agree with some of my observations, it appears?
I agree, tho, the CoDs made for consoles have been console shite and diluted. UO imo is still the best. so suck it.
I agree with your points/observations yep, I was only taking the piss .
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/