BF2S Forums Call of Duty: World at war

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Well how much with an ASUS (NVIDIA GEFORCE)  EN8800GT 256mb ?? Cause that's what I'm getting.

High settings, with a decent resolution.  I run a 9800GT and I could get the beta to run nicely, I'm thinking about getting CoD:4 over this, prefer the modern weapons.

I think they're both the same graphically speaking. (CD 4 and CoD 5)

So what is the feedback on the full game?

Worth it to buy?

White-Fusion wrote:

So what is the feedback on the full game?

Worth it to buy?

The full game is MASSIVELY better than the beta. If you even almost liked the beta, you'll probably like the full game.

They fixed the rifles, fixed some hit reg issues, among a lot of other things.

I still have some gripes, though. The dogs are still fucking gay. The shell shock from the artillery is fucking gay. Pretty much every gun isn't very good at no-scoping, even with steady aim. There have been times where I'm 10 feet away from a guy, standing still, with the guys whole body inside the crosshair and just pumping lead at him and hit nothing, then other times where I 1-shot from long distances while no-scope. Weird, tbh.

Other than a few bugs and glitches that every new release has, I think it's pretty good. I haven't played it competitively yet, so my opinion is just based off some pubbing, but meh... I think it'll be fun for a while.

krazed wrote:

why do we not get extra points for killing a tank? shouldn't we?

edit: and why is this in the cod4 section?

Cause it's a mod for cod4

csmag wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

COD5 > ALL

I can't wait for my new PC this thursday to play it on high resolution and min. 100 FPS

I take it you have a 9800GX2.

They just rock.

couldn't be, he'd be getting over 250fps. Thats waay better than any shity ati.

Nope sorry. Game has so many fps problems it's not even funny, even top of the line pc's don't get 125 fps.