Longbow wrote:
N00bkilla55404 wrote:
BF2 is older, more popular, and actually has better gameplay if you are well rounded in skills.
2142's infantry is done better. I like BF2 and all, but speaking of weapon\class balance 2142 is far better. And movement and it's effects on accuracy/deviation are very well balanced.
N00bkilla55404 wrote:
The only people that bitch about balance are the ones that whored karkand for 2 years then suddenly decided to try wake.
I'm not one of them. Anyways, you won't listen to me, but still - most of BF2's 64 player maps can be easily whored by air units, while in 2142 ground vehicles atleast have chances to score some kills before they will be burned by gunships.
N00bkilla55404 wrote:
if you are well rounded in skills.
A BF2 game, despite what is thought, is a whole team effort. If your Mobile AA/jets are not doing their job taking out enemy jets/choppers, your ground units get consequently raped. Air whores cant capture flags, so your ground units need to be fast, yet effective. In a organized team/squad setup, you would be surprised how good a round can be. In 2142 too often i find myself going rambo on a whole squad+tank as infantry on suez and coming out on top. Maybe it has to do with the fact i can podsurf behind them and take the tank out with no fight, but there is no such luxury in 2. Also, if you are talking about infantry
balance in 2142, i have 2 words for you: Voss whores. And i thought the G36E was bad...
Longbow wrote:
I'm not one of them. Anyways, you won't listen to me, but still - most of BF2's 64 player maps can be easily whored by air units, while in 2142 ground vehicles atleast have chances to score some kills before they will be burned by gunships.
Swap 2142 with 2 and gunships with planes and you get the same result. I can tell you are not a smart tank driver from that quote alone.
Last edited by N00bkilla55404 (2008-04-10 07:49:12)