-_{MoW}_-Assasin wrote:
why are people voting for intel?
Unfortunately, some people haven't experienced the benefits of shorter, fatter pipelines offered by AMD. The P4 is like a dragster, it's great in a straight line, but in real world conditions it's no different to the Athlon. The AMD offers more performance to cost ratio and is generally preferred as a result.
atlvolunteer wrote:
The question was "What CPU do you have in your system?" not "What should I get?"
My system entails:
AMD Athlon 64 3400+ (754 pin)
MSI nForce 3 250Gb Mobo
1GB Kingston RAM
XFX Geforce 6800 Ultra
This seems to run BF2 alright, benchmarks pretty well but lacks the dual channel (128 bit) memory bus that a 939 pin processor offers. (That speeds it up by 3-4 times when you use 2 sticks of RAM by the way)
Unfortunately, although my system is only 18 months old now, most of it's obsolete. I recently built a system for a friend of mine using the spec I listed in my previous post, only using a 4800+ X2 (dual core) processor, MSI K8N nForce 4 Diamond Skt 939 motherboard, 2 x 1GB + 2 x 512MB Corsair TwinX 3200 RAM (Windows XP will only handle up to 3GB of RAM by the way) and a 7800GTX graphics card, and it's awesome. Although the benefits of the dual core aren't obvious as nobody's found a way to utilise it fully yet, hence spend more on your graphics card than you would on your processor as your processor will be out of date, or at least half the price, within a day or 2.
Anyway, good luck with your project.
P.S. My mum runs a P4 system at her office, and it sucks. My old Athlon XP 2600+ nForce 2 Ultra 400 system whoops its' rear end.
Last edited by Herbmaster007 (2006-01-06 08:14:29)