Another one who never played the game but say it sucks...pathetic.xxCaptainBlackxx wrote:
No jets,no Helis (like in BF2)
Weapons suck+gaining points is slow
Last edited by Longbow (2008-01-19 14:33:15)
Another one who never played the game but say it sucks...pathetic.xxCaptainBlackxx wrote:
No jets,no Helis (like in BF2)
Weapons suck+gaining points is slow
Last edited by Longbow (2008-01-19 14:33:15)
um FYI CSS goes up to 92 000 players at prime time or that's the highest I have seen it on. As of right now when it's 22:22 in Sweden CSS got around 88 000 players on.Johnny_Extremer wrote:
Don't you mean Counter Strike? That would sound better because people still play 1.6 and hate source depends though. I just think saying Counter Strike in genereal sounds better. COD4 has been called the Source killer in comp in case you didn't know.FloppY_ wrote:
The COD4 & CSS comparison is far better because they are the same kind of game.... and i just don't see COD4 surviving for as long as CSS has/will...
I concur....Longbow wrote:
I like both.
Combined with the lag I get on Titan maps, which I totally love conceptually...just can't play.Ganko_06 wrote:
I quit because of rampant stat padders, hackers, and wall glitchers. Hell, I found the server where the ADMIN were doing all three. I gave up on the game after that.
NS.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I just reinstalled 2142 and NS
Terrorists?eaglecorps wrote:
You can't go around pulling the BF2 is realistic card. It's not as realistic as you say EX. it does NOT take 6 shots from an M16A2 to kill a terrorist and you can not bunny hop down a hill and live to tell about it. Granted 2142 is not as real per say but the kit customization is way better than 2 tbh. Oh look i unlocked a new weapon for my sniper kit in bf2 whoopie. Well I unlocked a freakin recon drone with machine guns on it and a shotgun that fires sticky C4. Honestly who doesnt love that? Yes battle walkers are cool and you know you wish you had the tank zoom function. I'll play 2142 till im the LAST one in the snow. So play on future soldiers play on!
Actually they failed again...fucking podsurfers piss me off.Volatile wrote:
I heard they nerfed some shit in that last patch, like podding(DICE = lulz). Hopefully they didn't ruin that which I enjoyed the most.
I don't get it, they nerfed the drop pods coming from the beacon too muchLongbow wrote:
Actually they failed again...fucking podsurfers piss me off.Volatile wrote:
I heard they nerfed some shit in that last patch, like podding(DICE = lulz). Hopefully they didn't ruin that which I enjoyed the most.
They break normal fbf setting of NS maps. They baserape. They glitch into buildings. Need more? I may go on.FloppY_ wrote:
BTW: What do you specifically hate about pod surfers ?
It's all about money, who gives a fuck about good support or high quality as long as ppl buy it?specialistx2324 wrote:
when Bf2142 came out, i was hoping to come back to the Battlefield series.. 2142 was a total let down. i mean look at how many more servers you have up for Bf2 than BF 2142.
after 1.3 patch for Bf2 came out with the CTD problem, i knew already than DICE does not give a rats ass anymore about "quality" .
i mean look at how many expansion packs that BF2+ Bf2142 has already. back in the 80's when atari came out, the videogame dinosaurs were releasing more games and at the same time the quality went down the shitbowl.
longbow, you missed the point m8. ill explain it to youLongbow wrote:
It's all about money, who gives a fuck about good support or high quality as long as ppl buy it?specialistx2324 wrote:
when Bf2142 came out, i was hoping to come back to the Battlefield series.. 2142 was a total let down. i mean look at how many more servers you have up for Bf2 than BF 2142.
after 1.3 patch for Bf2 came out with the CTD problem, i knew already than DICE does not give a rats ass anymore about "quality" .
i mean look at how many expansion packs that BF2+ Bf2142 has already. back in the 80's when atari came out, the videogame dinosaurs were releasing more games and at the same time the quality went down the shitbowl.
Last edited by specialistx2324 (2008-01-28 07:46:21)
specialistx2324 wrote:
longbow, you missed the point m8. ill explain it to youLongbow wrote:
It's all about money, who gives a fuck about good support or high quality as long as ppl buy it?specialistx2324 wrote:
when Bf2142 came out, i was hoping to come back to the Battlefield series.. 2142 was a total let down. i mean look at how many more servers you have up for Bf2 than BF 2142.
after 1.3 patch for Bf2 came out with the CTD problem, i knew already than DICE does not give a rats ass anymore about "quality" .
i mean look at how many expansion packs that BF2+ Bf2142 has already. back in the 80's when atari came out, the videogame dinosaurs were releasing more games and at the same time the quality went down the shitbowl.
support and high quality games bring in more profit in the long term than 6-8 crappy games in a 3 year span . case in point: BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT. they dont release many games unlike those douchebags in Sweden ( DICE) and EA games. when they release games, they are masterpieces. and masterpieces is what makes money long after the technology has leaped 5-10X afterthe game has been released.
look at how well their genere has done, Warcraft, Starcraft, Diablo, and so on. IF Warcraft, and Starcraft were made in the "fast food " fashion that Battlefield was made, do you think that Blizzard would be the company that it is now???????? you think about that question M8
not only that, go play any blizzard game and you will see the countless morons who have hardware bans because of hacks. So you are saying Longbow, as long as people buy it , quality does not matter. well it does matter for good gamers like myself and several of my buddies who have been in the gaming business long before you. what good is it for me to buy a medium quality game like Bf2 that has won international respect only to have it trashed by hackers, administrators, and a crap load of bugs. i mean no game is perfect man. but to have Bf2 or 2142 go Crash to Desktop ( CTD) with one click of the start icon Scares the hell out of me.
yes Blizzard and EA/ DICE make two entirely different genres. What EA/ DICE fail to understand LONGBOW, is that although games with a shitload of bugs but wider fan base makes more money initially, they will loose money in the end because no one will buy any sequels after that.
i go to my local videogame store every saturday like Best Buy or EB games. I go to the PC gaming area and i see the same old bf2142 boxes standing there collecting dust. the most i have seen at one time is 2 people buying it. and ill agree with anyone here that Bf2 is a far superior game than 2142.
i dedicated a year and a half to Bf2 and the Special Forces XP, i know all the tricks and noob tactics that every one knows. i retired by Bf2 account with 1st Lt. i got almost every award there is. right now my Bf2 cd is my cupholder. based on what you just said, people just buy shit these days. well that is why they get shit in return for $50 USD.
now another question Longbow for you: are the people who buy these "awsome" games as you call it educated enough to make good decisions.
it seems to me these days that gamers now just run to the store and buy the "cool " games when they have not done one drop of research.
would you rather buy 15-20 games per year where only 1/3 of them are memorable , or buy 10 games where at least 7 of them are awsome?
now back to 2142 and Bf2. i swear on god's green earth that i am not going to buy anymore Battlefield games in the near future especially if EA/DICE is involved. i got my best friend into the BF2, he played it for a while, got to master sgt, and he will tell you the same shit i am saying to you. and he got pissed after asshats, morons, hackers were running around the ROX servers like theres no tomorrow.
you dont care about quality?, why dont you buy a ford Mustang and ill buy a BMW, and we will see who has the most problems after 10 years. you get what you pay for ..... and ill end my discussion with you on that note. have a nice day
JoinLongbow wrote:
Another one who never played the game but say it sucks...pathetic.xxCaptainBlackxx wrote:
No jets,no Helis (like in BF2)
Weapons suck+gaining points is slow
Last edited by xxCaptainBlackxx (2008-01-28 08:59:30)
I care about quality, but if theres nothing better in the whole genre of squad-based fps - I do not complain about the best game in the genre. Sure it have '-' , but also it have much more '+'.specialistx2324 wrote:
you dont care about quality?, why dont you buy a ford Mustang and ill buy a BMW, and we will see who has the most problems after 10 years. you get what you pay for ..... and ill end my discussion with you on that note. have a nice day
Last edited by lxcpikiman (2008-01-28 10:08:42)