Pages: 1 2 3

 

2007-12-08 17:36:59
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6800|Long Island, New York

seymorebutts443 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Flecco wrote:

Vietnam pl0x.
Pack of 100 soldiers.

Move forward, get ambushed.

Move forward, get ambushed.

Retreat, get trapped in spider holes.

Retreat, get fucked up even more.

Dead.

Game over.

Sorry, I just don't think Vietnam would work. And it wouldn't make a lot of sense going BACK to WWII. I think they should stay in modern combat, but a more futuristic version. Say...2030?
they already made a futuristic version, its called Crysis and it rapes CoD4 in the story aspect and graphic aspect.
I have both Crysis and CoD4 for the 360. Even on the 360, it kicks 10x more ass than Crysis EVER will. Easier to play, better storyline, more fun as a whole.

Last edited by Poseidon (2007-12-08 17:37:08)

2007-12-08 17:56:09
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6710|Chicago, IL
Call of Duty 5: Gettysburg
2007-12-08 17:59:32
eusgen
Nugget
+402|7055|Jupiter

RandomSchl wrote:

damnit I still need to get Call of Duty 4
lmao me too xD
2007-12-08 19:04:26
Commie Killer
Member
+192|6650
CoD5 is gonna be made by a different company then made 1,2, and 4. Im waiting for Call of Duty 6:Tet Offensive
2007-12-08 19:23:22
The_Mac
Member
+96|6488

Commie Killer wrote:

CoD5 is gonna be made by a different company then made 1,2, and 4. Im waiting for Call of Duty 6:Tet Offensive
See? Someone who thinks like me.


Poseidon wrote:

I have both Crysis and CoD4 for the 360.
Crysis isn't for the xbox 360.

Last edited by The_Mac (2007-12-08 19:24:24)

2007-12-08 19:57:13
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6953|Tampa Bay Florida

S.Lythberg wrote:

Call of Duty 5: Gettysburg
Plus Fredericksburg and Antietam.... awsum
2007-12-09 09:22:29
The_Mac
Member
+96|6488
Ok, well apparently Tetrarch is making CoD5 (figures) and it's set in....


World War 2.

LOL
2007-12-09 09:56:07
jord
Member
+2,382|6941|The North, beyond the wall.
More SAS please. Like a secret war, about 12 years in the future.
2007-12-09 10:35:00
The_Mac
Member
+96|6488

jord wrote:

More SAS please. Like a secret war, about 12 years in the future.
Do you even read other people's posts?
2007-12-09 10:46:44
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6549|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Sarrk wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

specialistx2324 wrote:


"and remember kids, graphics is all that is needed to make a game good"  looks like you have your head in your ass for too long m8.

ive been gaming for eons, and good graphics alone dont entice me to get a game. i did not buy crysis because of two things

1) my rig can run it but it will look like dung
2) storyline is crap from what i hear.

if you think graphics makes the game, man i hope you do more Homework for a change. case in point. Warcraft III. crappy graphics by todays standards, but one of the top RTS games of all time.
Dude, you should do YOUR homework because that comment was OBVIOUSLY sarcasm....
He said dung lolz.
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
2007-12-09 11:22:17
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6800|Long Island, New York

The_Mac wrote:

Commie Killer wrote:

CoD5 is gonna be made by a different company then made 1,2, and 4. Im waiting for Call of Duty 6:Tet Offensive
See? Someone who thinks like me.


Poseidon wrote:

I have both Crysis and CoD4 for the 360.
Crysis isn't for the xbox 360.
No shit. I didn't say that. I said CoD4 for the 360.
2007-12-09 11:27:31
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6549|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Poseidon wrote:

The_Mac wrote:

Commie Killer wrote:

CoD5 is gonna be made by a different company then made 1,2, and 4. Im waiting for Call of Duty 6:Tet Offensive
See? Someone who thinks like me.


Poseidon wrote:

I have both Crysis and CoD4 for the 360.
Crysis isn't for the xbox 360.
No shit. I didn't say that. I said CoD4 for the 360.
You said "I have both Crysis and COD4 for the xbox" in english that means you have BOTH for the Xbox

I have Crysis for PC and COD4 for Xbox  =  fixed4u

Last edited by FloppY_ (2007-12-09 11:28:11)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
2007-12-09 11:33:43
djphetal
Go Ducks.
+346|6599|Oregon

FloppY_ wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

The_Mac wrote:

Commie Killer wrote:

CoD5 is gonna be made by a different company then made 1,2, and 4. Im waiting for Call of Duty 6:Tet Offensive
See? Someone who thinks like me.



Crysis isn't for the xbox 360.
No shit. I didn't say that. I said CoD4 for the 360.
You said "I have both Crysis and COD4 for the xbox" in english that means you have BOTH for the Xbox

I have Crysis for PC and COD4 for Xbox  =  fixed4u
yeah, but you probably could have let it slide, because you should have known what he meant...
2007-12-09 11:40:26
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6549|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

djphetal wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


No shit. I didn't say that. I said CoD4 for the 360.
You said "I have both Crysis and COD4 for the xbox" in english that means you have BOTH for the Xbox

I have Crysis for PC and COD4 for Xbox  =  fixed4u
yeah, but you probably could have let it slide, because you should have known what he meant...
Yeh i guess so
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
2007-12-09 11:46:58
jord
Member
+2,382|6941|The North, beyond the wall.

The_Mac wrote:

jord wrote:

More SAS please. Like a secret war, about 12 years in the future.
Do you even read other people's posts?
Sometimes, why what's your problem? I want more SAS in the next COD, what does that have to do with other people's posts?
2007-12-09 12:18:38
bakinacake
HA HA
+383|6249|Aus, Qld

haffeysucks wrote:

S3v3N wrote:

AC-130 Spectre Gunship.



I want more of that.
That mission was pure win!
I know ay, its heaps easy to get points in the arcade mode thing on this map.
https://i.imgur.com/LGvbJjT.jpg

 

Pages: 1 2 3

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard