[Crysis] First Crysis 2 Details

2007-11-29 19:57:01

#1

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|6907

Graphical improvements a key focus, and the sequel moves beyond aliens and Korean soldiers... ?

First details on Crysis 2 have found their way onto the internet in the wake of Crytek boss Cevat Yerli explaining the FPS has been designed as a trilogy.

According to a report on fansite inCrysis - via GameStar.de - Crytek lead animator Steven Bender has let slip that the developer will focus even greater attention on graphics for the sequel, a translation from German explaining, "Their ambitious aim is to push the game's visuals to an advanced level, that could be considered near photorealistic movie quality."

A tiny plot detail is additionally given - that the sequel will concentrate on more than battles with aliens and Korean military. Which, you probably would have guessed at anyway.

And that's your lot for now...

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/ar … ?id=176381

2007-11-29 20:08:42

#2

ceslayer23: IN YOUR MIRROR; +142|6623|CLOSER THAN I APPEAR

Pics or it didn't.... errrrr..

I won't get excited for it until I see some screen shots

2007-11-29 20:09:52

#3

aj0404: It'll just be our little secret; +298|6612|Iowa...

all that hype and we're already talking about a second one?

2007-11-29 20:13:49

#4

TimmmmaaaaH: Damn, I... had something for this; +725|6702|Brisbane, Australia

aj0404 wrote:
all that hype and we're already talking about a second one?

/

Our computers can't run this one, and we are talking about a second one?

https://bf3s.com/sigs/5e6a35c97adb20771c7b713312c0307c23a7a36a.png

2007-11-29 20:14:04

#5

topthrill05: Member; +125|6840|Rochester NY USA

Well yes we are hearing a little buzz, but we wont see Crysis 2 till at least 09. IMO.

2007-11-29 20:19:10

#6

RandomSchl: |\/|€|\/|ß€|2; +52|6706|California

lulz, they're focusing on improving graphics when Crysis can barely run now. We'll just start to be able to play Crysis when Crysis 2 comes out.

2007-11-29 20:24:42

#7

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6917

This is bullshit. Why not make one good game instead of forcing people to shell out $150 for a trilogy! Game companies these days...

2007-11-29 21:05:52

#8

ReTox: Member; +100|6761|State of RETOXification

mtb0minime wrote:
This is bullshit. Why not make one good game instead of forcing people to shell out $150 for a trilogy! Game companies these days...

Because they know schmucks will buy them.

I bought Crysis and thought it pretty much sucked compared to other new games. All that hype and outside of the graphics it wasn't that good at all.

Let's see them improve the game/plot/physics/everything else before making it prettier.

2007-11-29 21:54:38

#9

NOGGIN: God.; +40|6782

ReTox wrote:
Let's see them improve the game/plot/physics/everything else before making it prettier.

QFT
I have a pritty top end system and it still strugles on high with AA.
Keep the graphics as they are and improve on other things. imo

2007-11-30 04:32:36

#10

UK|Hooligan: Seriously, fuck off.; +103|6950|"The Empire"

NOGGIN wrote:
ReTox wrote:
Let's see them improve the game/plot/physics/everything else before making it prettier.
QFT
I have a pritty top end system and it still strugles on high with AA.
Keep the graphics as they are and improve on other things. imo

Agree, and same here, i play it on everything high but turn all AA off to make it run that bit better!!

2007-11-30 21:33:27

#11

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6800|Long Island, New York

Crysis 2: Running at 10 FPS on $550 video cards. Coming to your local Gamestop soon.

2007-12-01 00:50:13

#12

xGj: Official lame Crysis fanboy.; +84|6634|Netherlands tbh

You guys, I don't know whats up with you lol, but I made this thread just below yours: http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=84919
Because you're probably too lazy to read: It's a config file, that sets the crysis settings somehow to very high, but in a custom way, with 40-60 fps on my system!!

2007-12-01 00:56:38

#13

rub: Member; +3|6380

i actually bought cryisis,nice single-player but the multiplayer sucks real bad! worst thing ingame must be the chopper, absolutely shitty handling! DONT BUY IT! NOT WORTH THE MONEY!

2007-12-09 14:11:31

#14

GodFather: Blademaster's bottom bitch; +387|6482|Phoenix, AZ

imo they should focus on optimization, then graphics. And patch the hell out of Crysis 1 with some nasty optimization goodness before they start going, "...near photorealistic movie quality." all over Crysis 2's ass.

2007-12-14 14:19:00

#15

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|6907

"Their ambitious aim is to push the game's visuals to an advanced level, that could be considered near photorealistic movie quality."

wow imagine the graphics

Last edited by blademaster (2007-12-14 14:19:17)

2007-12-14 15:05:01

#16

elbekko: Your lord and master; +36|6663|Leuven, Belgium

Imagine the video cards required...

*wanders off imagining a wall full of SLI'd 9x series cards*

2007-12-14 15:11:16

#17

konfusion: mostly afk; +480|6812|CH/BR - in UK

I'm running it on low and I still think it looks better than Far Cry...
I love this game. I guess I'm one of the few.

-konfusion

2008-01-11 17:49:30

#18

Lynx14: Member; +41|6233

Hopefully the multiplayer will be a bit more satisfying and a bit less laggy. Fix multiplayer crytek!

2008-01-12 09:13:30

#19

ShadowFoX: I Hate Claymores; +109|6793

I actually like how crytek is pushing the envelope in graphics while many other games recycle their old engines over and over again i.e. cod2 - cod4. So what if you cant run it on max settings with 20x aa when it comes out it still looks better then anything else on the market on the lower settings. This engine is probubly one of the best engines ive seen so far. Graphics are amazing, physics are amazing, in addition to all the other stuff. Remember when games like Doom 3 and Far Cry came out and most people whinned about not being to max them out well big deal you can wait for the GPU technology to catch up and it makes you appreciate the work, beauty and complexity behind the engine even more.

2008-01-15 03:05:55

#20

JaMrulezass: Member; +47|6727|Hong Kong

ShadowFoX wrote:
I actually like how crytek is pushing the envelope in graphics while many other games recycle their old engines over and over again i.e. cod2 - cod4. So what if you cant run it on max settings with 20x aa when it comes out it still looks better then anything else on the market on the lower settings. This engine is probubly one of the best engines ive seen so far. Graphics are amazing, physics are amazing, in addition to all the other stuff. Remember when games like Doom 3 and Far Cry came out and most people whinned about not being to max them out well big deal you can wait for the GPU technology to catch up and it makes you appreciate the work, beauty and complexity behind the engine even more.

This man has a brain.

2008-01-15 03:10:58

#21

some_random_panda: Flamesuit essential; +454|6653

JaMrulezass wrote:
ShadowFoX wrote:
I actually like how crytek is pushing the envelope in graphics while many other games recycle their old engines over and over again i.e. cod2 - cod4. So what if you cant run it on max settings with 20x aa when it comes out it still looks better then anything else on the market on the lower settings. This engine is probubly one of the best engines ive seen so far. Graphics are amazing, physics are amazing, in addition to all the other stuff. Remember when games like Doom 3 and Far Cry came out and most people whinned about not being to max them out well big deal you can wait for the GPU technology to catch up and it makes you appreciate the work, beauty and complexity behind the engine even more.
This man has a brain.

And no incentive to play for gameplay. And I thought COD 2's engine wasn't the same one as COD 4. If it was, well, it somehow ran 30 fps faster the second time round.

Personally, I think the physics suck too. No assault rifle can cut through a tree in 4 bullets.

Last edited by some_random_panda (2008-01-15 03:12:14)

2008-01-15 03:13:13

#22

FloppY_: +1,010|6548|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

konfusion wrote:
I'm running it on low and I still think it looks better than Far Cry...
I love this game. I guess I'm one of the few.

-konfusion

No you'r not, I am in love with the demo and I am going to buy the game soon...

What i can't understand is all this whine about bad gameplay and so on?
The weapons, the world and your movement feels so awesomely smooth and realistic,,,

The weapons alone make you feel like they really weigh something and that they are actual 3D models in your hand, not just some 2D stiff'ish feel like in CS and COD4......

And the ability to customize everything on your weapons is so ****ing awesome! on of the very best gameplay features of crysis along with the Nanosuit.....

I know the multiplayer is kind of a let-down, but tbh is not THAT bad (i played the MP beta)...

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2008-01-15 03:16:18

#23

some_random_panda: Flamesuit essential; +454|6653

FloppY_ wrote:
konfusion wrote:
I'm running it on low and I still think it looks better than Far Cry...
I love this game. I guess I'm one of the few.

-konfusion
No you'r not, I am in love with the demo and I am going to buy the game soon...

What i can't understand is all this whine about bad gameplay and so on?
The weapons, the world and your movement feels so awesomely smooth and realistic,,,

The weapons alone make you feel like they really weigh something and that they are actual 3D models in your hand, not just some 2D stiff'ish feel like in CS and COD4......

And the ability to customize everything on your weapons is so ****ing awesome! on of the very best gameplay features of crysis along with the Nanosuit.....

I know the multiplayer is kind of a let-down, but tbh is not THAT bad (i played the MP beta)...

Gameplay is about plot, character development, "immersion" and that sort of thing. Granted, the graphics help immersion, but they could have hired a better script writer.

2008-01-15 03:18:22

#24

FloppY_: +1,010|6548|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

some_random_panda wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
konfusion wrote:
I'm running it on low and I still think it looks better than Far Cry...
I love this game. I guess I'm one of the few.

-konfusion
No you'r not, I am in love with the demo and I am going to buy the game soon...

What i can't understand is all this whine about bad gameplay and so on?
The weapons, the world and your movement feels so awesomely smooth and realistic,,,

The weapons alone make you feel like they really weigh something and that they are actual 3D models in your hand, not just some 2D stiff'ish feel like in CS and COD4......

And the ability to customize everything on your weapons is so ****ing awesome! on of the very best gameplay features of crysis along with the Nanosuit.....

I know the multiplayer is kind of a let-down, but tbh is not THAT bad (i played the MP beta)...
Gameplay is about plot, character development, "immersion" and that sort of thing. Granted, the graphics help immersion, but they could have hired a better script writer.

Gameplay is about balance, weapon tweaking, AI, the "feel" and so on....

Story/script/plot is another thing

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2008-01-15 03:28:20

#25

some_random_panda: Flamesuit essential; +454|6653

FloppY_ wrote:
some_random_panda wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
No you'r not, I am in love with the demo and I am going to buy the game soon...

What i can't understand is all this whine about bad gameplay and so on?
The weapons, the world and your movement feels so awesomely smooth and realistic,,,

The weapons alone make you feel like they really weigh something and that they are actual 3D models in your hand, not just some 2D stiff'ish feel like in CS and COD4......

And the ability to customize everything on your weapons is so ****ing awesome! on of the very best gameplay features of crysis along with the Nanosuit.....

I know the multiplayer is kind of a let-down, but tbh is not THAT bad (i played the MP beta)...
Gameplay is about plot, character development, "immersion" and that sort of thing. Granted, the graphics help immersion, but they could have hired a better script writer.
Gameplay is about balance, weapon tweaking, AI, the "feel" and so on....

Story/script/plot is another thing

If you say so.

Half Life 2 still has no weapon tweaking, the wort linearity of many games and mildly stupid AI at best.

Last edited by some_random_panda (2008-01-15 03:29:15)

BF2S Forums [Crysis] First Crysis 2 Details

aj0404 wrote:

mtb0minime wrote:

ReTox wrote:

NOGGIN wrote:

ReTox wrote:

ShadowFoX wrote:

JaMrulezass wrote:

ShadowFoX wrote:

konfusion wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

konfusion wrote:

some_random_panda wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

konfusion wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

some_random_panda wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Board footer