Matches the usertitle, if a bit bland. 4/10.
idk wat it is but it's interesting. 8/10
Maybe I'll get Lance to redo my failure.
Maybe I'll get Lance to redo my failure.
Last edited by RTHKI (2010-04-20 12:51:20)
Sib but a bit different/10
6/10
6/10
8/10
cool
cool
Avatar w/sharp border = 7/10menzo wrote:
8/10
cool
Girls with lips paler than their tan-booth skin = 2/10
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
It's a lemming you knob.RTHKI wrote:
idk wat it is but it's interesting. 8/10
Maybe I'll get Lance to redo my failure.
Floppy, boring, old. Doesn't appreciate hawt chix.
1/100000
Appreciate hawt chix... just not the female equivelant of a guido...Finray wrote:
It's a lemming you knob.RTHKI wrote:
idk wat it is but it's interesting. 8/10
Maybe I'll get Lance to redo my failure.
Floppy, boring, old. Doesn't appreciate hawt chix.
1/100000
Lemmings are old too you know
I could be a douche like you and rate 1/100000 but to be fair it's a 7/10 for correct background colour and originality...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
It's called transparency.
It sure is.. that is why you get those nasty left-over pixels on the borders that some simple anti-aliasing could have fixed..Finray wrote:
It's called transparency.
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
You try getting a perfectly clean cut from a graphic with a non-transparent background, which wasn't pre anti-aliased. Yeah, even PNG won't save you here.FloppY_ wrote:
It sure is.. that is why you get those nasty left-over pixels on the borders that some simple anti-aliasing could have fixed..Finray wrote:
It's called transparency.
Last edited by Finray (2010-04-23 12:57:57)
yay pentool worked for once
Wasn't it you who did the one I have as current?
I dunno lol ¯\(o_°)/¯Finray wrote:
Wasn't it you who did the one I have as current?
I must've used something else to cut out the white part.
lelelel
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
prefer it when the wording isnt coloured.
so you can read it as dragon balls.
4/10
so you can read it as dragon balls.
4/10
8/10
I bet it has a story behind it
also lance just made mine he's an awesome guy
I bet it has a story behind it
also lance just made mine he's an awesome guy
10/10. britney rokksss. thought of using a britney ava myself, but didn't.
yet.
yet.
No, I don't need an attitude adjustment. You just need to fuck off.
You should have the avatar I'm having, that's what you should have.Eifa wrote:
10/10. britney rokksss. thought of using a britney ava myself, but didn't.
yet.
I need around tree fiddy.
No idea what it is but 7/10 for quality and borderDonFck wrote:
You should have the avatar I'm having, that's what you should have.Eifa wrote:
10/10. britney rokksss. thought of using a britney ava myself, but didn't.
yet.
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
I did your steam one.Finray wrote:
Wasn't it you who did the one I have as current?
I love your floppy drive, flopster. 9/10 for it being classic, timeless and works with your nick.FloppY_ wrote:
No idea what it is but 7/10 for quality and borderDonFck wrote:
You should have the avatar I'm having, that's what you should have.Eifa wrote:
10/10. britney rokksss. thought of using a britney ava myself, but didn't.
yet.
Mine is the logo for the local Hockey team who are now playing in the finals. I'm having this until they win/lose the Finnish Championship.
I need around tree fiddy.
9/10 - as stylish as ever tho i do miss the Buffalo Bill avatar.
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me. Thanks for your useless input.Miggle wrote:
I did your steam one.Finray wrote:
Wasn't it you who did the one I have as current?
baggs - 7/10.
9.99/10
Because I remember playing Lemmings when I was a kid.
Because I remember playing Lemmings when I was a kid.
6/10. I have no idea about what it is, but it doesn't look too shabby.BeardedHobo wrote:
9.99/10
Because I remember playing Lemmings when I was a kid.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP