Is COD2's highest graphics better than bf2's highest graphics?
Anyone?
I don't have a gfx card strong enough to see for myself.
I don't have a gfx card strong enough to see for myself.
Probably.
the answer to that is yes CoD 2 does push your GFX card harder than bf2, a lot of PC magazines use CoD frame rates as a bench mark for GFX cards, this does not mean it is a better game it just pushes your card harder thats all.
Quote of the year so far "Fifa 11 on the other hand... shiny things for mongos "-mtb0minime
I can set my graphics on High in COD2, but only med in BF2, hope that helps.
ok i can set my graphics
full AAx6 1600x1200res and get 103 fps
Extra everythin max 1600x1200 i get 40-75fps
CoD2 looks sooooo much better
but i have driver issues with my card, rly need to sort it out
full AAx6 1600x1200res and get 103 fps
Extra everythin max 1600x1200 i get 40-75fps
CoD2 looks sooooo much better
but i have driver issues with my card, rly need to sort it out
In COD2 you can switch between DX7 rendering and DX9 rendering (or something like that).
I could run on medium/high with DX7 and around 50 FPS. But with DX9 never over 10 FPS. There is a HUGE difference in requirements.
I could run on medium/high with DX7 and around 50 FPS. But with DX9 never over 10 FPS. There is a HUGE difference in requirements.