great to see you again topal i only seem to see you in this threadtopal63 wrote:
Actually, I don't think there is such a thing as English letters. I've heard of "old english," but that is moot - the type-face used in this forum is not "english." So those certainly are not "english" letters. Letters used in/by the english language - yes. But, they are not "english" letters anymore than they are "arial narrow" or "century gothic" letters.xBlackPantherx wrote:
Not necessarily. Is your name different because you go to a country with a different language? No. It's the same. Name's are pronounced the same. But, his statement is too vague to be proven right or wrong.**LiLp-DeFiNeD wrote:
That's easy.
Your forum name in english letters is "UK-GOLDENEAGLE"
In some ither language, it'll be other letters.
Sometimes I'm busy... but this thread is always fun/funny to me. It's all about having fun with ideas IMO. That's why me likey.mkxiii wrote:
great to see you again topal i only seem to see you in this threadtopal63 wrote:
Actually, I don't think there is such a thing as English letters. I've heard of "old english," but that is moot - the type-face used in this forum is not "english." So those certainly are not "english" letters. Letters used in/by the english language - yes. But, they are not "english" letters anymore than they are "arial narrow" or "century gothic" letters.xBlackPantherx wrote:
Not necessarily. Is your name different because you go to a country with a different language? No. It's the same. Name's are pronounced the same. But, his statement is too vague to be proven right or wrong.
Max is awesome.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Beyond awesome.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Max is awesome.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
You aren't gay and you're definitely not a transsexual man woman
Too easy.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
You aren't gay and you're definitely not a transsexual man woman
who ever did this was doing it during the time he did itDeathUnlimited wrote:
Just say something, I'll prove it wrong. Give it a try!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
As the things have gone (a bit too) serious here, I will now write down the unwritten rules. Nothing but common sense, but some of you just don't seem to understand without help.
1. Do not use My (or NooBesT's / topal63's / mkxiii's) statements against us. EVER.
2. Do not correct your statements, nor edit them, or we'll disqualify them.
3. Keep flamewars & other shit out of here.
4. If you make some kind of mistake in your statement it's not our fault and we can use that to prove your
statement wrong.
5. The rules might change any time, If I'm forced to change them. Check this once in a while.
6. I am the OP, NooBesT is my #1 assistant and topal63 is the Einstein. mkxiii is just a nub helping out
AND THE ULTIMATE RULE: DO NOT TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUSLY!!!!
If I kick your nuts, its gonna hurt.
So if you kick the nuts that are in that nut bowl of which I own, it's going to hurt me? Weird.thtthht wrote:
If I kick your nuts, its gonna hurt.
Well go on then, prove it wrong bitchThe Sheriff wrote:
Too easy.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
You aren't gay and you're definitely not a transsexual man woman
Fuck.
God killed more people than satan. PROVE ME WRONG.
God, if he even exists, doesn't kill anyone. How often do you see bolts of lightening coming out of nowhere and killing people. Never. People kill people. Or they die of natural causes or events.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
God killed more people than satan. PROVE ME WRONG.
Natural Causes and events caused by godxBlackPantherx wrote:
God, if he even exists, doesn't kill anyone. How often do you see bolts of lightening coming out of nowhere and killing people. Never. People kill people. Or they die of natural causes or events.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
God killed more people than satan. PROVE ME WRONG.
Last edited by Mutantsteak (2008-08-01 20:57:53)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Prove to me God is real and I'll admit your right. Until then shut up.Mutantsteak wrote:
Natural Causes and events caused by godxBlackPantherx wrote:
God, if he even exists, doesn't kill anyone. How often do you see bolts of lightening coming out of nowhere and killing people. Never. People kill people. Or they die of natural causes or events.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
God killed more people than satan. PROVE ME WRONG.
EDIT: And don't say that God is as real as you believe him to be because I'll just rebut that by saying I'm an atheist.
Remember, if you can't prove it right it's wrong. So you shouldn't be putting up any statements you can't prove one way or the other.
Last edited by xBlackPantherx (2008-08-01 21:09:29)
is there Absolute Truth?
A person who free falls from 18 miles up in the sky and is falling at speeds over 180+ mph and lands head first on top of a jagged mountain and his mangled body slithers into a volcano cannot survive.
Amirite?
Amirite?
If definition of surviving is that the matter that his body was built from still exists, then he WILL survive.`MetaL* wrote:
A person who free falls from 18 miles up in the sky and is falling at speeds over 180+ mph and lands head first on top of a jagged mountain and his mangled body slithers into a volcano cannot survive.
Amirite?
you're a heterosexual male
No either dead or alive.NooBesT wrote:
If definition of surviving is that the matter that his body was built from still exists, then he WILL survive.`MetaL* wrote:
A person who free falls from 18 miles up in the sky and is falling at speeds over 180+ mph and lands head first on top of a jagged mountain and his mangled body slithers into a volcano cannot survive.
Amirite?
and if you're wondering yes he would be dead.
Besides the volcano's lava will destroy any remains of his carcass.
K bai.
"Chuyskywalker" is the name of the Bf2s forum account which belongs to the person who owns and founded Bf2s.
PROVE ME WRONG AHAHAHAHA!
PROVE ME WRONG AHAHAHAHA!
Women Have Vagina's
water is made from 2 parts hyrdogen, 1 part oxygen
Water also contains many impurities such as dirt, bacteria, and visible bits.Nappy wrote:
water is made from 2 parts hyrdogen, 1 part oxygen
What is defined a woman is in the eye of the beholder. This is why a M->F Transsexual can call themselves a women, even though they may or may not possess an artificial "vagina"GR34 wrote:
Women Have Vagina's
Last edited by N00bkilla55404 (2008-08-02 01:39:22)
Maybe hydrogen.Nappy wrote:
water is made from 2 parts hyrdogen, 1 part oxygen
Surviving does not mean staying alive, it means a part of him still exists. Some parts of him will remain in the place where he hit the ground.`MetaL* wrote:
No either dead or alive.NooBesT wrote:
If definition of surviving is that the matter that his body was built from still exists, then he WILL survive.`MetaL* wrote:
A person who free falls from 18 miles up in the sky and is falling at speeds over 180+ mph and lands head first on top of a jagged mountain and his mangled body slithers into a volcano cannot survive.
Amirite?
and if you're wondering yes he would be dead.
Besides the volcano's lava will destroy any remains of his carcass.
K bai.
If I got a penny every time that is written in this thread, I'd be a millionaire.argo4 wrote:
you're a heterosexual male
I am a forum account.
That's a question, not a claim. To answer it: 42Schittloaf wrote:
is there Absolute Truth?
He (me) had already done it during the time he did it, so he wasn't doing it anymore.thepilot91 wrote:
who ever did this was doing it during the time he did itDeathUnlimited wrote:
Just say something, I'll prove it wrong. Give it a try!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
As the things have gone (a bit too) serious here, I will now write down the unwritten rules. Nothing but common sense, but some of you just don't seem to understand without help.
1. Do not use My (or NooBesT's / topal63's / mkxiii's) statements against us. EVER.
2. Do not correct your statements, nor edit them, or we'll disqualify them.
3. Keep flamewars & other shit out of here.
4. If you make some kind of mistake in your statement it's not our fault and we can use that to prove your
statement wrong.
5. The rules might change any time, If I'm forced to change them. Check this once in a while.
6. I am the OP, NooBesT is my #1 assistant and topal63 is the Einstein. mkxiii is just a nub helping out
AND THE ULTIMATE RULE: DO NOT TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUSLY!!!!
Yup.N00bkilla55404 wrote:
What is defined a woman is in the eye of the beholder. This is why a M->F Transsexual can call themselves a women, even though they may or may not possess an artificial "vagina"GR34 wrote:
Women Have Vagina's
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
In more than two decades of high-speed operation, the TGV has not recorded a single fatality due to accident while running at high speed.