...Longbow wrote:
GTFO from 2142 forums.Ryan wrote:
The entire game needs to be nerfed.
CoD4 ftw
NO U
Poll
What needs a nerf?
| Walkers! | 13% | 13% - 33 | ||||
| Titan guns! | 5% | 5% - 13 | ||||
| Recon kit | 1% | 1% - 4 | ||||
| Engieer kit | 2% | 2% - 5 | ||||
| Assault kit | 2% | 2% - 5 | ||||
| Support kit | 7% | 7% - 18 | ||||
| AA's | 4% | 4% - 12 | ||||
| The APC's 2nd seat bombs | 9% | 9% - 24 | ||||
| Tank | 0% | 0% - 2 | ||||
| Nothing | 53% | 53% - 134 | ||||
| Total: 250 | ||||||
NO U
Back to your cage, now.kptk92 wrote:
...Longbow wrote:
GTFO from 2142 forums.
NO U
active cammo
Are you blind? Clocked recons are very easy to spot.boojiboy16 wrote:
active cammo
I might be getting the wrong idea about what nerf means then; I think the active cammo needs adjusting so it works betterLongbow wrote:
Are you blind? Clocked recons are very easy to spot.boojiboy16 wrote:
active cammo
nerf = downgrade, not upgradeboojiboy16 wrote:
I might be getting the wrong idea about what nerf means then; I think the active cammo needs adjusting so it works better
Maybe he means it's just that bad. That the kit is, in fact, so bad that even nerfing can't make it worse. Hell, it does suck a lot, nerfing might actually make it better somehow, lol.RDMC wrote:
Lol, yur saying, nerf the bad kit, doesn't that make it even more bad than it allready is..? lol..anyway I think the walkers are waaaayy to strong...-.-[LCI]squeakyfleece wrote:
engineer kit simply because it sucks