Lets go back to topic again huh?!
- Index »
- BF3S.com »
- BF2S Servers »
- BF2S:EU:2142 (Closed) »
- BF2s EU Community - Into the Future - 2142 Game Talk Only
and the_dude_5b^*AlphA*^ wrote:
uhm
RunDje_MC
Slayer677 (or667 )
KnightNifer
JenspmV2.0
trentnorris
NooBesT-FI (< I think)
the KM guy (crazy name)
Superfly.Cox
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pid=942412#p942412theDude5B wrote:
and the_dude_5b^*AlphA*^ wrote:
uhm
RunDje_MC
Slayer677 (or667 )
KnightNifer
JenspmV2.0
trentnorris
NooBesT-FI (< I think)
the KM guy (crazy name)
Superfly.Cox
I didn't forget you duddy
So is the 2142 account server down then since it is tuesday morning?
it's not that hard to type kmjnhb...
I love the walkers, but everytime I see a empty one, some noob gets in before me and starts walking around doing nothing untill he gets destroyed... why do people go into the things if they can't even destroy one tank with it??
I love the walkers, but everytime I see a empty one, some noob gets in before me and starts walking around doing nothing untill he gets destroyed... why do people go into the things if they can't even destroy one tank with it??
I am not a big fan of the walkers. in most maps with the walkers, there is always an enemy tank around the corner sitting next to an apc. so the apc hits you with the EMP and the tank drives up so close that your weapons have no effect. Also the tanks cannon has a much better effect at long range than the walker, so the tank can just sit back and take you out.
if the maps do not have tanks and APCs there are always loads of anti tank hiding everywhere and support guys with EMP granades.
I would rather be in the APC on the second gun.
if the maps do not have tanks and APCs there are always loads of anti tank hiding everywhere and support guys with EMP granades.
I would rather be in the APC on the second gun.
theDude5B wrote:
I would rather be in the APC on the second gun.
The walkers don't have any differences...^*AlphA*^ wrote:
Tank man here, sit back and use the zoom........the aim has multiple stuff for a reason if the walker turns his back on you then hes finished, same with other tanks,
but if I have to choose between walkers then the EU one anyway, the PAC one kinda sucks..
I said tanks noobest I took a walker out ones with 1 shot, so it doesNooBesT[FiN] wrote:
The walkers don't have any differences...^*AlphA*^ wrote:
Tank man here, sit back and use the zoom........the aim has multiple stuff for a reason if the walker turns his back on you then hes finished, same with other tanks,
but if I have to choose between walkers then the EU one anyway, the PAC one kinda sucks..
and no it wasn't smokin' like a lama
maybe not a 1 shot thing, back the back is 100% weaker
Duh I meant this:^*AlphA*^ wrote:
I said tanks noobest I took a walker out ones with 1 shot, so it doesNooBesT[FiN] wrote:
The walkers don't have any differences...^*AlphA*^ wrote:
Tank man here, sit back and use the zoom........the aim has multiple stuff for a reason if the walker turns his back on you then hes finished, same with other tanks,
but if I have to choose between walkers then the EU one anyway, the PAC one kinda sucks..
and no it wasn't smokin' like a lama
maybe not a 1 shot thing, back the back is 100% weaker
But true that walkers "ass" is weaker than other points (excluding the air vents)^*AlphA*^ wrote:
but if I have to choose between walkers then the EU one anyway, the PAC one kinda sucks..
I haven't made my mind up wether to by 2142. Is it any good ? Lots of people playing ?
most of our little elite group B. It´s funny, well if you play it with some buddies though. Unfortunatley, a standard EA/Dice product, with tons of bugs, lag, glitches etc. But, hey try it and play some rounds with us
1) Its a good game, though not as good as bf2B.Schuss wrote:
I haven't made my mind up wether to by 2142. Is it any good ? Lots of people playing ?
2) More teamwork oriented...points based more on how you do things rather than kills.
3) Unlock system is fun because unlocks improve your player
4) Vehicles not as good or dominating as in BF2. Tanks are much weaker, air is much much much weaker. Walkers can be pretty dominant.
5) Combat is very infantry oriented. Yourself being a grunt, you would actually like this alot because no longer will you be dominated by a tank or apc raping your position...they'll get you more than you get them but will certainly not dominate you like was the case in bf2.
6) Kits: Balance is okay though the engineer kit could be better. Support kit base weapons are the only issue of unbalance in the kit system at the moment. The support LMGs get more accurate as you hold down the fire button and you can fire pretty well from a kneeling stance...kind of a noob gun cause anybody can be good with it.
7) Maps: the city maps are pretty sweet in my opinion. Lots of cover everywhere keeps walkers and tanks away from you. Bigger maps can can be a little more tedious as the
8) you'll be annoyed at first in making the transition from bf2 because game play is a little different, maps are designed a little differently, weapons feel different...it took me about maybe 10 hours to get the hang of it.
verdict:
if bf2 was a 10, 2142 would be about an 8.75
definitely worth the buy
Last edited by superfly_cox (2006-11-07 04:21:03)
or this way, when you prefer Thx for making a good list Soup
that's when you turn on your shields, destroy the APC with a couple of missiles then take out the tank, in close battle, the walker always win over a tank... unless the guy in the walker is a complete idiot... the trick when close to a tank is to not stop moving, just keep on walking around/beside it, it doesn't take to many missiles to destroy a tank...theDude5B wrote:
I am not a big fan of the walkers. in most maps with the walkers, there is always an enemy tank around the corner sitting next to an apc. so the apc hits you with the EMP and the tank drives up so close that your weapons have no effect.
ah, if a tank is shooting at me from far away, I either go behind cover or I run up close with the shields on and just blow up that tankAlso the tanks cannon has a much better effect at long range than the walker, so the tank can just sit back and take you out.
meh, the walker is a infantry killer if used correctly, only danger is the pilum AVR and mines, but mines can be avoided, thank god for the mine alarm...if the maps do not have tanks and APCs there are always loads of anti tank hiding everywhere and support guys with EMP granades.
yea, the mortar is the best infantry killer in the game, but you don't have any controll of the shield and the mortar does no damage to armour/walkersI would rather be in the APC on the second gun.
Added bit to Soup's review to Schuss -
If you play 2142 for ages, then go back to Bf2.. it seems in BF2 you can Over sprint....
And grenades are thrown way too fast.
If you play 2142 for ages, then go back to Bf2.. it seems in BF2 you can Over sprint....
And grenades are thrown way too fast.
Hi,
Just wondering! Is there also a BF2s EU 2142 server?
Just wondering! Is there also a BF2s EU 2142 server?
As of just now, no.Gillenator wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering! Is there also a BF2s EU 2142 server?
Gillenator wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering! Is there also a BF2s EU 2142 server?
Don't Open It!!!
Crap, too late!
NOW you've gone and done it!
- Index »
- BF3S.com »
- BF2S Servers »
- BF2S:EU:2142 (Closed) »
- BF2s EU Community - Into the Future - 2142 Game Talk Only