uziq wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/25/new-zealand-referendum-same-flag-what-was-that-about
$27m on a few photoshop PSDs and you couldn't even choose one.
this is why you will never be an influence on global affairs.
Oh c'mon Uzique, you know it's more than just that.
Dilbert_X wrote:
I think you're projecting there.
Possible. But I have been part of this debate for a long time and the conversation has changed significantly. Only a few weirdos like myself used to be into this whole flag change thing, now it's much larger. Before if you asked in a referendum "should we change the flag?", (as many were suggesting should have happened this time,) you probably wouldn't even have had enough returns to call a result. With the current mood I genuinely think there could be a yes result to that question. It's just a shame that wasn't asked as part of the second referendum to give an actual picture and save me speculating.
There are a lot of people who voted for the existing flag who are bitching now about a missed opportunity, some are even a little embarrassed that, to those who may have looked briefly at what we were doing, (John Oliver and no-one else,) the supposed brave forward-looking nation that we are was revealed to be a scared and irritable child, clinging to a relic from a dead empire to save us the imposition of having to stand for something. Even if it was a pointless something like the colours and patterns on a bit of cloth.