psychology is a 'social science' and 90% of work on a psychology course will be professionalized research, either towards theoretical or clinical ends. not many 'soft skills'. you can argue all 'proper' university degrees also teach you soft skills: time-management, presentation, formal writing, deep-analytical and evaluative skills, the ability to collaborate with peers, the ability to network with people of various backgrounds, the ability to publicly speak and deliver your ideas in front of an audience, etc. almost every degree involves this. it's all in the prospectuses and brochures for every single course at every single institution where any single prospective student has ever asked "will this help me get a job?". every 'hardcore' academic degree teaches sale-able skills. otherwise how do you think all the grads from 'traditional' courses at top skills snap up all the top jobs? they're hardly bookish twerps that can't tie a shoe-lace together. it's a false representation and a false dichotomy between 'traditional' subjects and the less-rigorous ones, which are lighter on hard-content and richer on those soft-skills.
i conceive of the university as first and foremost an academic research institution. a place of scholarship. you can develop soft-skills almost anywhere. in fact, many of the best salespeople and entrepreneurs are non-university educated, precisely because they developed their acumen and soft-skills elsewhere. WHICH IS A GREAT THING. i encourage this fully, it is 100% my point. not everyone needs to go get a meaningless degree.
anyway shouldn't this be in d&st chat? we're having the same convo in two different threads. this is an insult to texas.
Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-07-13 08:39:05)