Pochsy wrote:
Jay wrote:
I apologize if you wish to be treated on a more personal level, but I don't know you much beyond my past experience with you which consisted of you parroting uzique and calling me stupid while acting condescending from your perch in a provincial government post. You are mildly more interesting than larssen, so you do have that going for you.
Uzi and I have similar education backgrounds. It's likely led to a number of similar characteristics and views.
I suspect Larssen knows something about Political Science or International Relations. This is also part of my education background. I appreciate being considered the more interesting one between us.
all three of us have graduate school degrees and work in white-collar fields using said graduate-school expertise.
i suspect we have very different politics. i know i do to larssen.
of course jay lumps us all together as ‘brainwashed snobs’ because he just has no experience with or perspective on people from grad-school careers. he’s a technician who never went to a proper university. to him we’re all just lib cucks. worse, we are pansies and pretty boys. we do effete work. our working conditions don’t chap our skin or brutalise us. he’s deeply suspicious of that.
we are all ‘un-creative followers’ because we’ve been schooled. of course, jay just betrays that he has no idea what said schooling is even about; it’s simply not in his ken. i don’t think jay could get a PhD in history or even, heaven forbid, physics if he spent the next 10 years of his life having a run at it. and i suspect there’s much more ‘creativity’ and independent-thinking in our master’s theses than there is in his daily air-con work and checklists.
also: remember, we are the snobs when we criticise his posts, but it’s fine for him to denigrate your (more socially regarded, much more competitive) field as ‘woman’s work’, ‘a provincial government post’, etc. as if the guy could even get a job in policy doing photocopying.
Last edited by uziq (2020-05-03 03:39:50)