Poll

Intel or AMD

Intel47%47% - 55
Amd52%52% - 61
Total: 116
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7161|Alberta, Canada

Well I had that whole 'Best Punk Band' thing going, and I guess i don't know what punk is, so, whatever.

I'll do this one, if it already hasn't been done.

Which ever one you choose, give a reason why you chose it. This will help me decide when I get my new computer.
OneSixty
Member
+14|6811|Melbourne
intel are the best is because amd arnet. . . yeh
GR34
Member
+215|6863|ALBERTA> CANADA
i like amd but that new intel celoron processer is really kick ass
OneSixty
Member
+14|6811|Melbourne
are you sure ?the CELERON ? that would be a first.
Cbass
Kick His Ass!
+371|7012|Howell, Mi USA
Intel ftw!!!1one1
https://bf3s.com/sigs/bb53a522780eff5b30ba3252d44932cc2f5b8c4f.png
USAFDude_1988
Will fly for food.
+120|6827|Daytona Beach, FL
I've always used Intel.. I was gonna switch to AMD.. except now Intel's finally back on top with its new Core Duo chip.
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6840|...

I've always use AMD procs, because i want to seem dark, moody and lathargic ... and they've usually been less money .. doesnt seem so anymore
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6919|132 and Bush

Core Duo's.. duh   2 more weeks till I get my 6800
And the bad thing is AMD's next comeback will be their 4 x 4's (2 dual core chips in one). Since the amount of apps and games that even support dual core alone are far and few between I can't understand why they would be heading this way.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
jord
Member
+2,382|6996|The North, beyond the wall.
Intel because the name sounds alot better as i've said before.

I feel strongly on this subject.

When someone says AMD i think they mispelled and ,and i have to reread what they wrote.
Aardcore
Member
+60|7031|USA, Arizona

jsnipy wrote:

I've always use AMD procs, because i want to seem dark, moody and lathargic ... and they've usually been less money .. doesnt seem so anymore
LOL me too, but are you sure about that? I've seen most Intel chips running cheaper, I just figured AMD because AMD seemed more reliable and efficient.
BigmacK
Back from the Dead.
+628|7069|Chicago.
P4 in my rig as we speak. Duo when I build my next one.

Intel.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6919|132 and Bush

Aardcore wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

I've always use AMD procs, because i want to seem dark, moody and lathargic ... and they've usually been less money .. doesnt seem so anymore
LOL me too, but are you sure about that? I've seen most Intel chips running cheaper, I just figured AMD because AMD seemed more reliable and efficient.
Vs old Intel yes , Vs new Intel no. Especially when it comes to efficiency.
How there can be so many AMD votes blows my mind. The benchmarks are very clear.

Last edited by Kmarion (2006-08-17 10:52:01)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7161|Alberta, Canada

looks like intel is taking it lol
B1GBUD
Member
+17|6914|Under an Artillery Shell
Intel.... got an OC'd 805D, its f'king sweet!!
SGT.Slayero
Member
+98|6783|Life in a vacuum sucks
fuck intel
Canterwood
Member
+4|6838|Canada

Kmarion wrote:

Core Duo's.. duh   2 more weeks till I get my 6800
And the bad thing is AMD's next comeback will be their 4 x 4's (2 dual core chips in one). Since the amount of apps and games that even support dual core alone are far and few between I can't understand why they would be heading this way.
reverse hyper threading
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6840|...

Aardcore wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

I've always use AMD procs, because i want to seem dark, moody and lathargic ... and they've usually been less money .. doesnt seem so anymore
LOL me too, but are you sure about that? I've seen most Intel chips running cheaper, I just figured AMD because AMD seemed more reliable and efficient.
No intel is competative with price. I've use both. Tend to go with AMD because it turns out that way. Its a fact that intels are bencing better.
Richard2000
Banned
+39|6863|England
AMD all the way
64 x2 next rig
T0rr3nt
Member
+54|6895|Michigan
i used to love amd, however since the C2D came out, im impressed with intel.
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6840|...

Richard2000 wrote:

AMD all the way
64 x2 next rig
Doesn't an odd amount of ram negate the dual channel functionality?
Richard2000
Banned
+39|6863|England

jsnipy wrote:

Richard2000 wrote:

AMD all the way
64 x2 next rig
Doesn't an odd amount of ram negate the dual channel functionality?
no works very well for me
the_hitman_kills
Agent 47 wannabe
+32|6783|Inside my APC
Got me a Intel P4 3.0 GHz Northwood, still runs all the games out. When it doesn't then I'll upgrade.

But i think the P4 Duo should be nice, they should run cooler and use less power then Prescotts, so no need for a psu that will suck the national grid dry
deadawakeing
Ummmmmmmmmmmmm
+145|6800
Intel its more of all all around processor I hear. Also I have intel duh!!

3.0 ghz Hyper Threading im proud
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6919|132 and Bush

deadawakeing wrote:

Intel its more of all all around processor I hear. Also I have intel duh!!

3.0 ghz Hyper Threading im proud
By all around you mean in everything now..
lol including gaming. I think the AMD guys are stuck in the past.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7039|Sydney, Australia
Intel...

I've currently got a 3.0Ghz P4 in my crap box (it's dell, ok?).



Next computer will have a Core 2 Duo. That'll be good not only for gaming, but for using Photoshop CS2.





Mcminty.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard