BVC
Member
+325|6949
Maybe the missile did work, but the US missile defense system also worked...
polarbearz
Raiders of the Lost Bear
+-1,474|7042|Singapore

Shifty
Member
+3|6891|Maine

Pubic wrote:

Maybe the missile did work, but the US missile defense system also worked...
No it said on the news that they didn't activate the us missile defense system. There shity missiles just landed in the ocean.

Last edited by Shifty (2006-07-05 00:15:09)

BVC
Member
+325|6949
A ploy to rain in on the 4th of July perhaps?
Shifty
Member
+3|6891|Maine
yeah most likely I dont think its a coincidence that it happened on the fourth and about the same time the space shuttle was supposed to take off.
parthian1000
Member
+8|6914|The Barbary Coast
From an international politics point of view, the North Koreans have just shot their load - both practically and figuratively.  They've been trading off the threat of what they could do, now they've just demonstrated that the threat is somewhat hollow.  Their scope for bargaining with the rest of the world is diminished just like the local psycho kid who threatens to bring a knife into school and then turns up with a butter knife rather than a big hunting knife he's been bragging about owning.

I suspect officials in th US State Department are laughing their collective asses off.
JahManRed
wank
+646|6881|IRELAND

The long range missile, touted as the USA attacker exploded 1mile from take off. Panic over............ NEXT!!
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6815
I suspect they're still wondering about whether they have nukes to throw at South Korea.
Shifty
Member
+3|6891|Maine
well they just launched a 7th missile that most likely killed some fish.
<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|6955|New York
They dont have to wonder, they do have them. Also, those Missiles that went into the sea, Id bet were not fully fueled, thus making it possible that they could throw a few at Japan, a country with NO nukes. But before you see this happen, you will see China step up to the plate, maybe as soon as today.
bad-card
Member
+1|6760

Bubbalo wrote:

You're right, China wouldn't be anything without trade with the West (not just US).  But now the US relies on China's cheap, cheap products.
theres a difference between a benefit and a reliance

theres plenty of 3rd world asian countries to take over chinas commerce to the us. vice versa really china doesnt have any absolute reliance on the united states.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6815
I disagree: it would take time to set up sweatshops there, and in that time the US would suffer severe shortages of many products.
bad-card
Member
+1|6760
hardly we go to china becuase its cheaper. the only result would be slightly higher costs for those products.. not a shortage.

the united states has 2x more trade with canada. even mexico trades more than china with us

Last edited by bad-card (2006-07-05 03:36:37)

BN
smells like wee wee
+159|7021

parthian1000 wrote:

From an international politics point of view, the North Koreans have just shot their load - both practically and figuratively.  They've been trading off the threat of what they could do, now they've just demonstrated that the threat is somewhat hollow.  Their scope for bargaining with the rest of the world is diminished just like the local psycho kid who threatens to bring a knife into school and then turns up with a butter knife rather than a big hunting knife he's been bragging about owning.

I suspect officials in th US State Department are laughing their collective asses off.
I think the test was more symbolic than anything. They are just flexing their muscle just to remind everyone they are there.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6815

bad-card wrote:

hardly we go to china becuase its cheaper. the only result would be slightly higher costs for those products.. not a shortage.
I say again: it would take time to relocate.  During this time there would be a shortage.

bad-card wrote:

the united states has 2x more trade with canada. even mexico trades more than china with us
So far as I can tell, the trade with Canada is in completely different areas.  The products you get from China you seem to largely get from China (if you take my meaning).
parthian1000
Member
+8|6914|The Barbary Coast
I think the test was more symbolic than anything. They are just flexing their muscle just to remind everyone they are there.
I agree its symbolic but the fact that the missiles failed changes the symbolism; arguably to a meaning that the North Koreans didn't intend at all.  Now they just look inept.
HM1{N}
Member
+86|6897|East Coast via Los Angeles, CA

parthian1000 wrote:

I think the test was more symbolic than anything. They are just flexing their muscle just to remind everyone they are there.
I agree its symbolic but the fact that the missiles failed changes the symbolism; arguably to a meaning that the North Koreans didn't intend at all.  Now they just look inept.
See what happens when you try to overcompensate for a small penis???  The world still ends up laughing at you.

Last edited by HM1{N} (2006-07-05 05:53:08)

']['error
Banned
+630|6897|The Netherlands
Cold Fussion
72% alcohol
+63|6921|Sydney, Australia

JaMDuDe wrote:

I hope they fire a nuke at us and it stalls 30 seconds in and blows up half of north korea.
The rest of the world hopes it will hit.
']['error
Banned
+630|6897|The Netherlands

Cold Fussion wrote:

JaMDuDe wrote:

I hope they fire a nuke at us and it stalls 30 seconds in and blows up half of north korea.
The rest of the world hopes it will hit.
hak hak hak hak hak!
Cold Fussion
72% alcohol
+63|6921|Sydney, Australia

']['error wrote:

Cold Fussion wrote:

JaMDuDe wrote:

I hope they fire a nuke at us and it stalls 30 seconds in and blows up half of north korea.
The rest of the world hopes it will hit.
hak hak hak hak hak!
https://img465.imageshack.us/img465/7832/gta4gu6rw.png
bad-card
Member
+1|6760

Bubbalo wrote:

I say again: it would take time to relocate.  During this time there would be a shortage.
you underestimate companies desire to meet demand and you overestimate americas reliance on china. there is no chance whatsoever that comapnies couldnt keep up with demand.

Bubbalo wrote:

So far as I can tell, the trade with Canada is in completely different areas.  The products you get from China you seem to largely get from China (if you take my meaning).
no sorry thats not coherant. can i get that in english
specialistx2324
hahahahahhaa
+244|6942|arica harbour
Damn freakin koreans, US troops fought in the korean war and now they want to shoot missles at us. Man people are just smacktards.

Well I got in my trunk of my car: 5 packs of C4, A silenced 92FS pistol, My g36C with 120 rounds, and a remote detinator, and my zipline.  Ill go there and blow up five of their ICBM's, then i hope someone who plays battlefield 2 picks me up in a RIB.


Enemy boat spotted..
Enemy Korean spotted
-=AudigyXi=-
Member
+18|6909

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

i always knew they wouldnt be good enough to produce long range missiles
I heard they have a 10yr....100k mile warranty

Last edited by -=AudigyXi=- (2006-07-05 09:24:24)

Lib-Sl@yer
Member
+32|6966|Wherever the F**k i feel like

Bubbalo wrote:

I disagree: it would take time to set up sweatshops there, and in that time the US would suffer severe shortages of many products.
veitnam and bangladash already have sweatshops =P

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard