Last edited by topthrill05 (2006-07-02 09:32:28)
If you were browsing around MichaelSavage.com...I don't think you were changed much.topthrill05 wrote:
http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/
Go down to know your enemy and watch the beheadings. Those changed me.
Wow, now there's a shocker.Marconius wrote:
Wow...someone actually had the audacity to post a link to michael savage's website here...I might just have to close and delete this thread on principle. *headdesk*
Last edited by lowing (2006-07-01 04:41:09)
topthrill05 wrote:
http://www.homestead.com/prosites-prs/
Go down to know your enemy and watch the beheadings. Those changed me.
The person who started that said he didn't think they killed for no reason. So, you're complaining that he suggests a thread should be closed for right wing bias, on the basis that he left another thread with right wing bias open? Yet again, I feel the need for a WTF smiley on these forums.........lowing wrote:
but please keep "Do you think that US Soldiers like killing people, seriously?" open for another 8 pages...LOL noooooooo I see no bias here.
It is a stupid thread with a stupid topic which should not warrant any serious discussion.......yet it remains open for people to really discuss if we love to kill............so yes bubbalo there is blatant bias in this forum. Just because the bias is in your favor does not mean you can't to acknowledge it.Bubbalo wrote:
The person who started that said he didn't think they killed for no reason. So, you're complaining that he suggests a thread should be closed for right wing bias, on the basis that he left another thread with right wing bias open? Yet again, I feel the need for a WTF smiley on these forums.........lowing wrote:
but please keep "Do you think that US Soldiers like killing people, seriously?" open for another 8 pages...LOL noooooooo I see no bias here.
Well, if you think there are no such things as stupid topics I will not persue this with you because you are lost.Bubbalo wrote:
And that discussion is stupid how? Not that I believe they do, but to rank discussions is silly. Fact is, it was created with a right bias, whether you feel the topic is stupid is silly. Besides which, he was expressing an opinion when he said he almost felt like locking it, he didn't, in fact, lock it. Surely if the mods have a left bias he would have just locked it?
lol and whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy is that I wonder..............back to the beginning of this exchange aren't we?Bubbalo wrote:
No, but I feel that stupid discussions automatically die, this hasn't.
threads like that are kept alive by the admins....It is an absurd and insulting query, yet the admins keep it going. But they will shut down a thread about killing that terrorist Zarqwai.... go figure.Bubbalo wrote:
No, we aren't. The discussion started about mods being biased and locking threads they didn't like, I'm talking about threads of no value naturally dieing without being locked.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-07-01 12:36:09)
Last edited by topthrill05 (2006-07-01 12:34:26)
We were not talking about this thread. It was another we were discussing. You are right though, this isn't the place for that discussion, my apologies.topthrill05 wrote:
Thank you for understanding why I posted it. I as thought it might impact some people as well.
Last edited by topthrill05 (2006-07-01 15:39:46)