Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 … 11

 

2006-06-30 23:28:42
BN
smells like wee wee
+159|6997

Miller wrote:

Too bad the supreme court isn't ruled by conservatives.  It'd work much better.
You’re right. It would be a great place - everyone would be on a terrorist watch list, fbi listening to every call, email, sms, fart, no oversight of the government (we don’t need oversight. Its in good hands), none of those pooftas getting married (I don’t mind those lezzos on the internet mind you), the bible would be kissed before every class at school, a military of 10 million, the middle east would be a pile of dust and radioactive for the next 100 years, 1 language, 1 religion, wet dreams of Ann Coulter. That’s my idea of bliss. Bring it on I say.

Last edited by BN (2006-06-30 23:29:30)

2006-07-01 04:32:51
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6880|USA

BN wrote:

Miller wrote:

Too bad the supreme court isn't ruled by conservatives.  It'd work much better.
You’re right. It would be a great place - everyone would be on a terrorist watch list, fbi listening to every call, email, sms, fart, no oversight of the government (we don’t need oversight. Its in good hands), none of those pooftas getting married (I don’t mind those lezzos on the internet mind you), the bible would be kissed before every class at school, a military of 10 million, the middle east would be a pile of dust and radioactive for the next 100 years, 1 language, 1 religion, wet dreams of Ann Coulter. That’s my idea of bliss. Bring it on I say.
no, what would happen is.........our govt. would continue to take a proactive stance against terrorism, (instead if just sitting around and waiting for it to happen to us).The no oversight on govt. is a liberal thing not a Conservative thing. Conservatives do not like big govt. ( liberals do because they think the govt. should take care of our every need).

It is the liberals that want to throw out the morality, and the patriotism that the bible and the pledge of allegiance brings to our classrooms. (I am no bible thumper, but the moral lessons in the bible are sound,so what is wrong with re-enforcing sound morality? )

We would have a strong military, yes ( I think in todays world you had better have a strong military, unless you are going to be liberal and take a stance of "Peace at any price" attitude.)

As far as the middle east being a pile of dust, all I can say is, conservatives are in power now and it isn't a radioactive dust bowl.

1 language? You are god damned right!!...1 language to be our national language. All business to be conducted in it ( as opposed to having to choose which set of directions you wanna read or which language you wanna hear on the phone) It is the USA learn the language or leave. You assimilate to our way of life if you move here, not the other way around.

Not 1 religion at all, but no religions allowed, that directly go against the morals, ideals, and way of life that the American people hold as valuable. You decide if the teachings of Islam fall into that category.


Wet dreams of Ann Coulter??...sure why not??......I guess you prefer wet dreams of Micheal Moore or Al Franken.

Last edited by lowing (2006-07-01 04:35:38)

2006-07-01 05:30:18
<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|6931|New York

lowing wrote:

BN wrote:

Miller wrote:

Too bad the supreme court isn't ruled by conservatives.  It'd work much better.
You’re right. It would be a great place - everyone would be on a terrorist watch list, fbi listening to every call, email, sms, fart, no oversight of the government (we don’t need oversight. Its in good hands), none of those pooftas getting married (I don’t mind those lezzos on the internet mind you), the bible would be kissed before every class at school, a military of 10 million, the middle east would be a pile of dust and radioactive for the next 100 years, 1 language, 1 religion, wet dreams of Ann Coulter. That’s my idea of bliss. Bring it on I say.
no, what would happen is.........our govt. would continue to take a proactive stance against terrorism, (instead if just sitting around and waiting for it to happen to us).The no oversight on govt. is a liberal thing not a Conservative thing. Conservatives do not like big govt. ( liberals do because they think the govt. should take care of our every need).

It is the liberals that want to throw out the morality, and the patriotism that the bible and the pledge of allegiance brings to our classrooms. (I am no bible thumper, but the moral lessons in the bible are sound,so what is wrong with re-enforcing sound morality? )

We would have a strong military, yes ( I think in todays world you had better have a strong military, unless you are going to be liberal and take a stance of "Peace at any price" attitude.)

As far as the middle east being a pile of dust, all I can say is, conservatives are in power now and it isn't a radioactive dust bowl.

1 language? You are god damned right!!...1 language to be our national language. All business to be conducted in it ( as opposed to having to choose which set of directions you wanna read or which language you wanna hear on the phone) It is the USA learn the language or leave. You assimilate to our way of life if you move here, not the other way around.

Not 1 religion at all, but no religions allowed, that directly go against the morals, ideals, and way of life that the American people hold as valuable. You decide if the teachings of Islam fall into that category.


Wet dreams of Ann Coulter??...sure why not??......I guess you prefer wet dreams of Micheal Moore or Al Franken.
That last line is CLASSIC!!!  +1
2006-07-01 06:48:22
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7066
hury up and do Ann Coulter, shes fading fast !
2006-07-01 06:56:00
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7066

BN wrote:

Miller wrote:

Too bad the supreme court isn't ruled by conservatives.  It'd work much better.
You’re right. It would be a great place - everyone would be on a terrorist watch list, fbi listening to every call
Quick question,

wasn't it a liberal left wing President who had the FBI burn down a church while 200 or so  people were still alive in it.

who had FBI snipers shoot babies while they were being nursed by their mothers,

and a 12 year old boy and his dog? All with his knowledge and blessing.?

Wasn't it a liberal left wing president who said " We have to stop all this this talk radio "

Last edited by Horseman 77 (2006-07-01 07:26:57)

2006-07-01 07:02:58
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790
Horseman, which president (honest question)?
2006-07-01 07:25:25
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7066

Bubbalo wrote:

Horseman, which president (honest question)?
Can you remember the one before Before Bush?

If you have this level of knowledge on these topics, why do you want to weigh in and be heard?

Am I alone here or does anyone else find this frustrating?

Last edited by Horseman 77 (2006-07-01 07:28:15)

2006-07-01 07:30:46
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6880|USA

Horseman 77 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Horseman, which president (honest question)?
Can you remember the one before Before Bush?

If you have this level of knowledge on these topics, why do you want to weigh in and be heard?

Am I alone here or does anyone else find this frustrating?
Cut him so slack horseman, remember, he wasn't born yet when Clinton was in office.
2006-07-01 07:34:49
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7066

lowing wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Horseman, which president (honest question)?
Can you remember the one before Before Bush?

If you have this level of knowledge on these topics, why do you want to weigh in and be heard?

Am I alone here or does anyone else find this frustrating?
Cut him so slack horseman, remember, he wasn't born yet when Clinton was in office.
sory all, I over focus.
2006-07-01 08:04:59
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6778|Southeastern USA

Horseman 77 wrote:

hury up and do Ann Coulter, shes fading fast !
I'm on it!!! Watch my six!!!
2006-07-01 08:29:57
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790

lowing wrote:

Cut him so slack horseman, remember, he wasn't born yet when Clinton was in office.
Oh, I'm hurt.  Really, I think I'll go commit suicide because your opinion means so much.  Because, as we all know, knowledge is directly proportional to age.

I can't find anything on any of these, got any links?

As a side note, I find it hilarious that if I ask for info you hound me.  So, should I just assume everything you say is automatically false?  Really, is it that much of a crime to want to read into more depth on something?  Pa
2006-07-01 09:55:00
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6880|USA

Bubbalo wrote:

lowing wrote:

Cut him so slack horseman, remember, he wasn't born yet when Clinton was in office.
Oh, I'm hurt.  Really, I think I'll go commit suicide because your opinion means so much.  Because, as we all know, knowledge is directly proportional to age.

I can't find anything on any of these, got any links?

As a side note, I find it hilarious that if I ask for info you hound me.  So, should I just assume everything you say is automatically false?  Really, is it that much of a crime to want to read into more depth on something?  Pa
Nope, but for someone so opinionated on world affairs, I am quite taken back that you have no idea who our last president was.

and the stupidity of the most of your post warrants no comment.
2006-07-01 09:58:24
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790

lowing wrote:

Nope, but for someone so opinionated on world affairs, I am quite taken back that you have no idea who our last president was.
I am well aware who your last president was, I'm just unaware of him burning down churches.

lowing wrote:

and the stupidity of the most of your post warrants no comment.
This is in response to?
2006-07-01 09:58:55
Miller
IT'S MILLER TIME!
+271|6985|United States of America
Back to topic:  If our soldiers are fighting in Iraq and capture a terrorist, they should shoot them dead on the spot.  All this talk of soldiers murdering civilians is bull shit.  In war no one is innocent, it happens grow up, move on.  Now that terrorists can be released to fight again if they win their trial, our soldiers aren't going to give a shit about killing all the guys they capture. They don't want the enemy to come fight again and kill their friends! What would you do?  Let the enemy being taken prisoner, just so he'll come out and shoot again? Blow himself to dust, while killing friends?  Face it, our soldiers have it hard enough, now the Supreme Court has made it harder.
2006-07-01 10:00:39
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790
So, Miller, if I declare myself to be a member of the Iraqi Liberation Force and shoot some American civilians, it isn't murder, of course.  After all, in war, noone is innocent.
2006-07-01 10:03:07
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6880|USA

Bubbalo wrote:

So, Miller, if I declare myself to be a member of the Iraqi Liberation Force and shoot some American civilians, it isn't murder, of course.  After all, in war, noone is innocent.
You are right it isn't murder, but I hope you won't bitch about the consequences for your actions, for it isn't murder on our part either.
2006-07-01 10:05:02
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790

lowing wrote:

You are right it isn't murder, but I hope you won't bitch about the consequences for your actions, for it isn't murder on our part either.
Great, so now all anyone has to do to dodge a murder rap is claim they were fighting for Iraqis.  Oh no, lowing, all those blacks on death row will flood the streets and start having gay sex whilst voting liberal.  Whatever will you do!
2006-07-01 10:08:54
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6880|USA

Bubbalo wrote:

lowing wrote:

You are right it isn't murder, but I hope you won't bitch about the consequences for your actions, for it isn't murder on our part either.
Great, so now all anyone has to do to dodge a murder rap is claim they were fighting for Iraqis.  Oh no, lowing, all those blacks on death row will flood the streets and start having gay sex whilst voting liberal.  Whatever will you do!
Ya kinda need to be in some kinda military to be considerd a solider fighting in a war....A small point you forgot to mention.
2006-07-01 10:09:45
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790
So........the South Vietnamese rebels never fought a war?
2006-07-01 10:21:33
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6880|USA

Bubbalo wrote:

So........the South Vietnamese rebels never fought a war?
Again bubbalo I will not fall into your play on words............If you really can not see the distinction between fighting in a war and and a drug deal gone bad or a bank robbery  or a home invasion in an attempt to rob someone or a car jacking, so be it.
2006-07-01 10:23:19
Sea_JayUK
Member
+19|6752|Notts
Am i allowed to post here even though I'm not American?

Obviously cant speak for everyone in all the other countries but general concensus over this side of the pond is that America doesnt care about anyone elses rights. The public seem to be cowed by the overall propoganda following 9/11 and beyond and it's been deemed un-patriotic for Americans to speak out for anyone treated as a 'terrorist'.

maybe THIS is propoganda we've been fed by OUR media but if i watch CNN it does seem to be a little bit biased;

'The terrorist leader was killed in a US surgical missile strike on his compound, how are people reacting over there Tom'

'Well people can now see that the terorist leaders are certainly not untouchable now however most think this will just fuel the violence as the US has created another maytr'

'Well he's not a maytr, he died from a missile and he's a terrorist'

The gist of an interview from a few weeks back, the pronouncer seemed very angry the 'terrorist' was called a matyr.

Anyway Gyantanimo should be closed because it's illegal, whether 'the' high court say so or not.

(but it's not upto me)
2006-07-01 10:23:51
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790
How is it a play on words?  Besides which, you don't have to be part of a military to fight a war.  If I rock up in Iraq tomorrow and attack US soldiers with a gun to scare them off, I've taken part in the war.  I'm off to bed, chat tomorrow.
2006-07-01 10:24:45
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6778|Southeastern USA
https://img145.imageshack.us/img145/1137/chocolatemilk4fr.jpg
2006-07-01 10:26:42
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790
24 innocent civilians were a threat to armed soldiers?  I know I'm critical of the US army but damn, what the hell are you feed them?  Or aren't you?
2006-07-01 21:09:44
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790
Oh, that's real nice Horseman.  Even as we have a discussion in which you claim not to insult first, you call me an asshole.

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 … 11

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard