Could you please elaborate?Major_Spittle wrote:
Govenor of Arkansas
See, the bulk of three pages of discussion is centered around whether this is true. Maybe you could, y'know, provide some reasons.Major_Spittle wrote:
Abortion doctor.
Could you please elaborate?Major_Spittle wrote:
Govenor of Arkansas
See, the bulk of three pages of discussion is centered around whether this is true. Maybe you could, y'know, provide some reasons.Major_Spittle wrote:
Abortion doctor.
Yeah. See, what I'm wondering about, is what he did that you consider murder. Funnily enough, not everyone is American. In fact, only people who live in America are. Funny that, huh?yerded wrote:
He's talking about Clinton, being a murdering former gov of arkansas,
Huh, you still take naps? Maybe you aren't as mature as you though. Me, I don't really need them. I will be going to bed soon, though.yerded wrote:
Now go take a nap, bubbalo
No, what I'm waiting for is to know why guilty people are better qualified to judge a crime.yerded wrote:
I already explained what your waiting for, you didn't read.
While it may be argued that a lump of tissue the size of an eraser isn't human, something that has brainwaves, a heart beat, can feel pain (like the human fetus can at 6 weeks), kicks, sucks it's thumb, and can get hiccups like humans do before we are born probably is, when the change occurs we'll never know, so how about we err on the side of live babies. I mean are babies that are born premature not alive? My friend was born 2 months early, she'll get a kick out of that.TriggerHappy998 wrote:
W00t Pro-choice!
I've always wondered... if a fetus is "alive" at conception, why is it that we choose to celebrate the date of birth instead of the date of conception? Wouldn't that seem more logical if a baby is alive at that time?
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-06-10 08:33:57)
Thankyou.JG1567JG wrote:
Clinton was a big Pro-Abortion Governor and President.
How about the fact that info indicates that there have been more than a few incidents?JG1567JG wrote:
Please Please don't stereotype every single U.S. soldier because of the actions of a few. It just makes you look ignorant and stupid.
So, because we don't like America we must like terrorists? Good one.JG1567JG wrote:
I bet all these American haters were sad yesterday to see their Hero Zarqawi(sp) die. I'm sure he never hurt any women or children in Iraq.
I still support abortion pre-brain development. The lump of tissue is human in nature, except it's like a tumor. As I said, until the brain has formed, it's just a mindless leech. When you speak of "the change", I have a feeling you're talking about the ability to conceptualize. That's like...after toddler phase (the point at which adjusting and regularizing control over natural ability has been developed [i.e. major neuron construction = complete]). Children are about 4-12, and that's basically the point at which they could be categorized under the box named "Intelligent Life".kr@cker wrote:
While it may be argued that a lump of tissue the size of an eraser isn't human, something that has brainwaves, a heart beat, can feel pain (like the human fetus can at 6 weeks), kicks, sucks it's thumb, and can get hiccups like humans do before we are born probably is, when the change occurs we'll never know, so how about we err on the side of live babies. I mean are babies that are born premature not alive? My friend was born 2 months early, she'll get a kick out of that.TriggerHappy998 wrote:
W00t Pro-choice!
I've always wondered... if a fetus is "alive" at conception, why is it that we choose to celebrate the date of birth instead of the date of conception? Wouldn't that seem more logical if a baby is alive at that time?
Edit: and how exactly do you know that lump of tissue the size of an eraser isn't human anyway?
Yea, and you gotta carry your license to kill with you at all times (keep it next to your library card).Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Duh, when you are Bond.
Keep a notepad by the bed so you can keep up with all the various 'conception tries'.TriggerHappy998 wrote:
W00t Pro-choice!
I've always wondered... if a fetus is "alive" at conception, why is it that we choose to celebrate the date of birth instead of the date of conception? Wouldn't that seem more logical if a baby is alive at that time?
Really??!!..............So as a father of the child you have no say so in the life and death of your own son or daughter??Marconius wrote:
Actually, a better position on Abortion is this:
If you can't ovulate, then you just shut the hell up about it, as it's not your decision to make.
Why should a lesbo be more entitled to an opinion about this than me???Marconius wrote:
Actually, a better position on Abortion is this:
If you can't ovulate, then you just shut the hell up about it, as it's not your decision to make.
If the father and his family is willing to take full custody of the baby, why the hell not??Marconius wrote:
More like old pederasts in the House and Senate shouldn't be debating the contents of a woman's womb. And if you are the father, then yes, the ultimate decision comes from the mother. You'd exert control over her own wishes and force her to birth the baby even if she didn't want to? That doesn't sound like a free society to me...
Yes I watched both of my sons being born...have YOU ever seen a live birth??Marconius wrote:
Have you seen a live birth? Do you understand what the woman has to go through in mental and physical preparation prior to labor?
If you absolutely want to have a baby, you and your S.O. better have talked about that before you decide to have proper sex. If it was an accident, or if the woman was raped or a victim of incest, then it is their decision on whether or not to go through the entire physically debilitating process of having a baby, or aborting the fetus so they don't have to lose 9 months of their lives.
Even if you are willing to take custody, that still in itself is you and your family forcing their will on the mother. Again, that's not freedom.
Last edited by lowing (2006-06-10 15:39:48)
In the examples you give, rape, incest etc...I will agree with you. But to use abortion as a form of birth control is utterly irresponsible. Especially when there are loved ones willing to help, if not down right alleviate the burden of parenthood.Marconius wrote:
Sure have, except they weren't mine. I understand your position, lowing, but truth be told, your personal experiences cannot be assumed in order to control the lives of the rest of the women in this nation. Again, it comes down to you and your significant other fully talking about and understanding the gravity of having a baby vs. aborting it, especially during the time of your life. 10 years earlier, it would've been emotionally taxing on your girlfriend-now-wife to have carried the baby. Retrospect/hindsight is always 20/20, but you just have to wonder if going through the 9-month process would've really helped her...
Personally, I cannot have children, so I'll be looking to adopt when I get married and the time comes.
Edit: Good job changing your post just as I submitted. And Yes, I have seen abortions as well.
Yes I have. They have real good drugs and spinal blocks. There is also getting a "C section". Small price to pay compared to being tore apart and sucked through a tube. But the problem is that you don't see it that way and only are worried about what happens to YOU.Marconius wrote:
Have you seen a live birth? Do you understand what the woman has to go through in mental and physical preparation prior to labor?
If you absolutely want to have a baby, you and your S.O. better have talked about that before you decide to have proper sex. If it was an accident, or if the woman was raped or a victim of incest, then it is their decision on whether or not to go through the entire physically debilitating process of having a baby, or aborting the fetus so they don't have to lose 9 months of their lives.
Even if you are willing to take custody, that still in itself is you and your family forcing their will on the mother. Again, that's not freedom.
I am curious as to how you have seen live child births when you are not a father and for that matter abortions as well.Marconius wrote:
Peace, harmony, freedom, and the ability for a woman to choose what goes on with and in her body. Plus, I have a different viewpoint on when a fetus actually becomes a Person. Believe whatever you want, but I've seen live births and I've witnessed the various forms of abortion. It doesn't sway my belief in the slightest that it is none other than the mother's Right to Choose, since when it comes down to it, it's no one elses matter but hers. The baby is in Her womb, it's coming out of Her vagina, and she needs to spend 9 months of her life getting ready for it.
Abortion more irresponsible then accidentally getting pregnant? Just because you didn't wear a condom or didn't have a dam/cervical cap in place for recreational sex is no reason to force a woman to give up 9 months of her life and to physically handicap her body.
It's not like women who get abortions just run around having sex everywhere and just pop on in to get the fetus removed if/when she gets pregnant...
Planned Parenthood clinics have a full psychological exam prior to the abortion, to make sure the mother is ready for her decision. Loved ones can't have the baby for the mother, yes? And if the mother is working? If the mother has a time-sensitive job, or prefers an active lifestyle and just doesn't want to carry a baby?