Yer drunk right???Xietsu wrote:
I somehow made the inferrence that he died from natural causes a plausible one?
Teh Peeyess: Lowing, with everything you say, you just look more and more stupid. I like making people look stupid, it's always fun. So please, continue.
Teh Peeyess Nuhmbour Too: LawL. Now you're claiming he's a fallen hero of mine. You never cease to impress. 'Bout time for a golf clap, eh?
Teh Peeyess Nuhmbour Tree: Anywho, in case you're oblivious (which, by context...), in no way have my posts shown that I care whether or not you have a holiday celebrating his death. Sure, you could say I could accept it because it would be one where he enters "martyrdom", but seriously, who makes leaps in logic like that? omfGzz! D00d, now is a good time for some alliteration, no? Leaping Logic Lowing, eh...EHHH...?
I'm confused as to how a "karma score" generates idiocy as being in the proper (i.e. your validating your assumption with my "-8" [this set of parentheses wasn't originally here--you have to realize that I expect my audience to conjure up reasonable inferences that they are incapable of making])? Do you realize that my signature contains factual information? I think you should (and then give me negative karma for it, no?).lowing wrote:
your -8 karma would suggest otherwise, as I am told your karma is the pulse of your readersXietsu wrote:
I somehow made the inferrence that he died from natural causes a plausible one?
Teh Peeyess: Lowing, with everything you say, you just look more and more stupid. I like making people look stupid, it's always fun. So please continue.
I have been 'round and 'round with you before, you can beat your chest all ya want.
I don't drink alkuhhawl man. Oops, it should actually read "Logic Leaping Lowing".
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-08 17:35:44)
The company who built the drone that tracked him for the last three days?CruZ4dR wrote:
So who gets the 25$ million bounty? The pilot?
Yeah, the USG killed him, so it's kinda' like...already paid. Who knows...the pilot could get the money...but he didn't even know he did (killor teh nubs), so I don't even think he tried to claim the reward.
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-08 17:38:00)
Oh well, I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, that you must be fucked up artificially and temporarily. Sad to say, you seem to be fucked up naturally and permanently. My condolences to your mother.Xietsu wrote:
I'm confused as to how a "karma score" generates idiocy as being in the proper? Do you realize that my signature contains factual information? I think you should (and then give me negative karma for it, no?).lowing wrote:
your -8 karma would suggest otherwise, as I am told your karma is the pulse of your readersXietsu wrote:
I somehow made the inferrence that he died from natural causes a plausible one?
Teh Peeyess: Lowing, with everything you say, you just look more and more stupid. I like making people look stupid, it's always fun. So please continue.
I have been 'round and 'round with you before, you can beat your chest all ya want.
I don't drink alkuhhawl man.
Oh? Well, at least let me know how I'm "fucked up". I like correcting problems, too.
I think the iraqis who helped give the info that led to his location to his whereabouts. just like the guy who turned over saddam, but they ended up killing half his family for revenge.
Wow that's some education your showing off there with that language. It almost makes my eyes hurt to read most of your posts.d3v1ldr1v3r13 wrote:
You fucking hippies just dont get it, youre defending a man that leads a group that wants all Americans dead in any shape way or form. But hey if you want your views, have em, but dont blast me for having an opinion shitbag! And I know what it takes to defend freedom, from pieces of shit like you that want to let these assholes solve it in piece, the same fuckheads that send their children to troops with grenades, and suicide bomb, just to kill a few targets and kill many innocents. Shutup you fuckin hippies.
Sorry buddy, I am done with you, I am rejoining the party in the celebration........Go talk a shrink maybe he will have time for your shit.Xietsu wrote:
Oh? Well, at least let me know how I'm "fucked up". I like correcting problems, too.
Well, I appreciate your condolences and accept your defeat. Thank you for knowing your place.
welcome back.....lowing wrote:
Sorry buddy, I am done with you, I am rejoining the party in the celebration........Go talk a shrink maybe he will have time for your shit.Xietsu wrote:
Oh? Well, at least let me know how I'm "fucked up". I like correcting problems, too.
what a great day it is.
thx GunSlingerGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
welcome back.....lowing wrote:
Sorry buddy, I am done with you, I am rejoining the party in the celebration........Go talk a shrink maybe he will have time for your shit.Xietsu wrote:
Oh? Well, at least let me know how I'm "fucked up". I like correcting problems, too.
what a great day it is.
Rest in Pieces!!!
Thank you.....thank you. We killed the bastard with a lovely BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM from a couple of F-16's. I love those planes.
i dont usually drink but i think i just might have me a heineken after class today
But, seriously, what would happen if we caught Bin Laden? Do y'all seriously think that all the terrorists would just come out and be like "Oh noes! you caught Bin Laden, I give up." I mean, it would be a big break and all, but I personally dont think much would change.
THAT DUDE IS AS UGLY AS A ... *αí▒*ß>*■ **²** **■ φ*ε ...╘²*╘╤*$°*⌠*∞D⌡**Pé@(b"¢≥+µ]p┴5_╕ε╞[o╩ª=*╡*ÇJP╕∩ß╒≈ δ┌▌█*2*▐iε2╧ .
âQ0*CÑÙêx*íÒË Â@*Ј.
âQ0*CÑÙêx*íÒË Â@*Ј.
Nope, but there would be 1 less of those sorry ass bastards, now wouldn't there??mooncricket wrote:
But, seriously, what would happen if we caught Bin Laden? Do y'all seriously think that all the terrorists would just come out and be like "Oh noes! you caught Bin Laden, I give up." I mean, it would be a big break and all, but I personally dont think much would change.
More disruption would be caused than that, I would think. Osama Bin Laden is a financial driving force. You people speak of "cell type structure" within terrorism, but in truth, these people attempt to contact known organization: in this case, Al Qaeda. Disrupt the head of the network, and less attacks will have such organization and frequency. But that's just a theory (i.e. nobody knows if other prosperous peeps will make an ethical deriliction). .
(P.S. Kinda' relevant, but...Showtime!'s TV series Sleeper Cell was definitely great and interesting.)
(P.S. Kinda' relevant, but...Showtime!'s TV series Sleeper Cell was definitely great and interesting.)
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-08 18:13:05)
i agree, if they got him their organization is now just a football team trying to raise money for jerseys.Xietsu wrote:
More disruption would be caused than that, I would think. Osama Bin Laden is a financial driving force.
well not to that extreme but it will set them back years.
edited -
Last edited by Spearhead (2006-06-08 19:52:05)
-Edited by Author
Sorry again Spearhead.
Sorry again Spearhead.
Last edited by d3v1ldr1v3r13 (2006-06-08 19:53:12)
I saw it on the news. Good ridance...
Hey fella's, eventhough the Americans may have killed a terroriest i doubt you have seen the last of the attacks, although this may prove to the eventual disheartening of most terrorist i worry that it will only increase the attacks as they know have more "ammunition" so to speak, to justify to anyone who will listen that they are doing the right thing.
Lets put this in perspective however, this is a small victory and although it is a crucial one to the war effort this is only one man who seems to have spawned many terrorists unfortunatly.
And also for eveyone who is all whoo rahh about the massive bomb that obliterated a bunker, keep in m,ind that a women, and a child were murdered in this attack. They did nothing and will now be refered to as "collateral damage", clearly a massive understatement and a way to brush off a wayard death. Imagine some kid in America getting killed at night with her mother all to kill a terrorist, is it worth it?
Lets put this in perspective however, this is a small victory and although it is a crucial one to the war effort this is only one man who seems to have spawned many terrorists unfortunatly.
And also for eveyone who is all whoo rahh about the massive bomb that obliterated a bunker, keep in m,ind that a women, and a child were murdered in this attack. They did nothing and will now be refered to as "collateral damage", clearly a massive understatement and a way to brush off a wayard death. Imagine some kid in America getting killed at night with her mother all to kill a terrorist, is it worth it?
Collateral damage.
...Essentially...it goes without saying, that in the national realm of things, you ought to pursue the subduing of that which is globally unacceptable, else risk conflict and potential death, should such things be allowed to continue within a zone you reside. Of course, it can always be said that single, isolated incidents can cause such coincidental harm. As it were, it should be Arabs striking out against the inability of the Middle East to tie down the reigns of extremist groups located in their region. But hey, you can only expect so much out of people so willing to blindly follow (massive religiosity)--what is it to expect them to incite revolution against frail systems? This situation is particular though, as such movements would most probably have been quelled anyways (concerning Iraq). So, in that, I think it is so extremely justifiable to identify this as acceptable.
...Essentially...it goes without saying, that in the national realm of things, you ought to pursue the subduing of that which is globally unacceptable, else risk conflict and potential death, should such things be allowed to continue within a zone you reside. Of course, it can always be said that single, isolated incidents can cause such coincidental harm. As it were, it should be Arabs striking out against the inability of the Middle East to tie down the reigns of extremist groups located in their region. But hey, you can only expect so much out of people so willing to blindly follow (massive religiosity)--what is it to expect them to incite revolution against frail systems? This situation is particular though, as such movements would most probably have been quelled anyways (concerning Iraq). So, in that, I think it is so extremely justifiable to identify this as acceptable.
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-08 20:10:36)