the trumpetings of a truly arrogant writer
anybody reading this thread could clearly see you present nothing valuable countering my argument, while i provided clear precise references. but hey whatever. im not gonna take the time to write a 1000 word despcription of me calling you a fucking dumb ass. you fucking dumb ass. go ahead and have the last word, im not gonna continue this argument with somebody who compensates for his lack of real world knowledge with big pretty words to make himself feel smarty arty.Xietsu wrote:
You completely ignore the construct of rationality I display in response to your pathetic rebuttals each and every time. If you wish to call me an ideologue, you must be in opposition to the stance for that of the realist, perceptive, logical group. Do you have a problem with being wrong? Hey, you want to actually provide actual examination of the facts, so be it, but to claim that the particular news reports are evidence for upholding your opinion is to just fall prey to worthless propaganda. If you truly want to emphatically deny the facts I have presented, I can provide you with little else than the label of "fool".I first said thusly when I was like...12. So like...Xietsu FTW?pfc_toecutter wrote:
Come on...who says "Thusly?"Xietsu wrote:
Thusly.
(P.S. ^ /yes)
Yea, until you prove something Xietsu just stfu, Gunslinger has constanly proved you wrong and until you can do someting to counter that just SHUT THE FUCK UP. lolGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
anybody reading this thread could clearly see you present nothing valuable countering my argument, while i provided clear precise references. but hey whatever. im not gonna take the time to write a 1000 word despcription of me calling you a fucking dumb ass. you fucking dumb ass. go ahead and have the last word, im not gonna continue this argument with somebody who compensates for his lack of real world knowledge with big pretty words to make himself feel smarty arty.Xietsu wrote:
You completely ignore the construct of rationality I display in response to your pathetic rebuttals each and every time. If you wish to call me an ideologue, you must be in opposition to the stance for that of the realist, perceptive, logical group. Do you have a problem with being wrong? Hey, you want to actually provide actual examination of the facts, so be it, but to claim that the particular news reports are evidence for upholding your opinion is to just fall prey to worthless propaganda. If you truly want to emphatically deny the facts I have presented, I can provide you with little else than the label of "fool".I first said thusly when I was like...12. So like...Xietsu FTW?pfc_toecutter wrote:
Come on...who says "Thusly?"
(P.S. ^ /yes)
type type type, i bet he got his dictionary out for this one. start coming at me with latin
READ BELOW FOR LAST WORD
READ BELOW FOR LAST WORD
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-06-07 18:20:07)
I believe in maintaining humility when the adversary hasn't stooped to a level of lacking maturity. If an opponent has seen it fitting that they provide a mock-statement, what responsibility do I have to reciprocate? Always sad when someone immediately makes such a discount without comprehension of their justification.Spumantiii wrote:
the trumpetings of a truly arrogant writer
Hmm, I never knew that establishing and providing thorough analysis and examination of the subject wasn't "valuable" in the argument against your blind inclinations. lmao. Again, even after multiple reiterations, you still claim your references to news articles to actually hold any shred of relevance. Fucking sad. If you are unwilling to concede a loss to one who has truly bested you, just demonstrates your lacking maturity. But hey, if you're too ignorant to actually understand, positively take in, and then settle upon the ideas I've presented, then I sympathize with your extremely bad luck with genetics.
Obviously, you are just as oblivious as Gunslinger if you really think it proper to side with him.Capt. Foley wrote:
Yea, until you prove something Xietsu just stfu, Gunslinger has constanly proved you wrong and until you can do someting to counter that just SHUT THE FUCK UP. lolGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
anybody reading this thread could clearly see you present nothing valuable countering my argument, while i provided clear precise references. but hey whatever. im not gonna take the time to write a 1000 word despcription of me calling you a fucking dumb ass. you fucking dumb ass. go ahead and have the last word, im not gonna continue this argument with somebody who compensates for his lack of real world knowledge with big pretty words to make himself feel smarty arty.Xietsu wrote:
You completely ignore the construct of rationality I display in response to your pathetic rebuttals each and every time. If you wish to call me an ideologue, you must be in opposition to the stance for that of the realist, perceptive, logical group. Do you have a problem with being wrong? Hey, you want to actually provide actual examination of the facts, so be it, but to claim that the particular news reports are evidence for upholding your opinion is to just fall prey to worthless propaganda. If you truly want to emphatically deny the facts I have presented, I can provide you with little else than the label of "fool".
I first said thusly when I was like...12. So like...Xietsu FTW?
(P.S. ^ /yes)
(P.S. Please, let me know who's giving me karma. I could care less about "karma'ing" you back, but at least I'll know your mental ability beforehand, so that I never have to help clarify for you when you're confused. Because hey, what the hell is the point if you're just too god damn absent-minded?.
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-07 18:28:17)
...and I have the last word "poo"
Hey, if people don't see that I've replied they might not be interested. You better cut it out! RXT. But hey, at least I can be glad in the fact that this thread is killed. I've cleared up misconception here.
392 threads down...umpteen threads to go!
392 threads down...umpteen threads to go!
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-07 18:29:47)
here is a doctor, that denies the holocaust happened, and likes to use metaphors to describe the destruction of another sovreign nation.
As much as his rational arguments do hold some water, you can expect him to approach the world scene cordially. That doesn't mean he isn't a hater wishing death on jewish people.
You can't possibly find that administration credible yet. Your info is just as biased, probably also supporting the denial of the holocaust.
long drawn on sentences and paragraphs where words are sufficient only goes to show how badly you want to be looked up to on these forums. It's not particularly impressive, especially when you insult someone who has another piece of information which is just as valid as yours. Nobody can be so arrogant as to assume they are right, because they ONLY read the RIGHT info, never anything that's wrong. If you can truly tell the difference, there is a place for you in the media, because they don't want the public to know the whole story (hence nobody gets the real story)
Remember that Jewish temple that was sacked to build the dome of the mosque? Hmm, 1 holy city, 2 religions, one sacks the other's holiest place to build their 3RD holiest place, and they now claim they have precedence. The Jewish religion is 5000 years old and was seated in the holy lands, and if you look, Mohammed, and Islam, came much after that. If anything Jews have had a valid reason for being pissed for a long time.
As much as his rational arguments do hold some water, you can expect him to approach the world scene cordially. That doesn't mean he isn't a hater wishing death on jewish people.
You can't possibly find that administration credible yet. Your info is just as biased, probably also supporting the denial of the holocaust.
long drawn on sentences and paragraphs where words are sufficient only goes to show how badly you want to be looked up to on these forums. It's not particularly impressive, especially when you insult someone who has another piece of information which is just as valid as yours. Nobody can be so arrogant as to assume they are right, because they ONLY read the RIGHT info, never anything that's wrong. If you can truly tell the difference, there is a place for you in the media, because they don't want the public to know the whole story (hence nobody gets the real story)
Remember that Jewish temple that was sacked to build the dome of the mosque? Hmm, 1 holy city, 2 religions, one sacks the other's holiest place to build their 3RD holiest place, and they now claim they have precedence. The Jewish religion is 5000 years old and was seated in the holy lands, and if you look, Mohammed, and Islam, came much after that. If anything Jews have had a valid reason for being pissed for a long time.
Gunslinger, Can you please stop using facts to prove your point.
Its upsetting the monkeys & they are starting to throw shit. +1
Its upsetting the monkeys & they are starting to throw shit. +1
Last edited by vedds (2006-06-07 18:41:00)
lol. He only makes such a radical statement, because in fact, he knows it did happen. His point is that Europe should suffer and not the Middle East (as a result of the genocidal action taken against the Jews). Myopic and warped of you to think that I truly desire to be esteemed through the eyes of those that look upon me. The focal point is so that misconception is cleared. I gave a reference to an article, Gunslinger was just too lazy to go look it up. Honestly, can't fuckin' believe you still aren't seeing that. Anyways, I'm not claiming I receive my information from coverage portrayed without a bias. To make such an assumption is asinine. lmao. Wow...to actually claim I am in support of denying the Holocaust? Truly idiotic. Apparently, you haven't payed close enough attention to what I've said insofar.
Come on, I mean, considering that most who've come this far in this thread are most likely adults, you'd think it wouldn't be like teaching some out of touch punk.
Come on, I mean, considering that most who've come this far in this thread are most likely adults, you'd think it wouldn't be like teaching some out of touch punk.
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-07 18:56:00)
OMG a typo, can you spot it!Xietsu wrote:
lol. He only makes such a radical statement, because in fact, he knows it did happen. His point is that Europe should suffer and not the Middle East (as a result of the genocidal action taken against the Jews). Myopic and warped of you to think that I truly desire to be esteemed through the eyes of those that look upon me. The focal point is so that misconception is cleared. I gave a reference to an article, Gunslinger was just too lazy to go look it up. Honestly, can't fuckin' believe you still aren't seeing that. Anyways, I'm not claiming I receive my information from coverage portrayed without a bias. To make such an assumption is assanine. lmao. Wow...to actually claim I am in support of denying the Holocaust? Truly idiotic. Apparently, you haven't payed close enough attention to what I've said insofar.
Come on, I mean, considering that most who've come this far in this thread are most likely adults, you'd think it wouldn't be like teaching some out of touch punk.
EDIT:
PAYED=PAID
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-06-07 18:51:44)
Hey! Now it's your turn to enlighten me! I just forgot how to read, so would you mind letting me know so I can edit it and fix it?
facts?facts? who needs facts?vedds wrote:
Gunslinger, Can you please stop using facts to prove your point.
Its upsetting the monkeys & they are starting to throw shit. +1
asinine
not a great place to misspell that I might add, in the middle of a flame on someone for apparently having no rational thought process but that's beside the point
not a great place to misspell that I might add, in the middle of a flame on someone for apparently having no rational thought process but that's beside the point
Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-06-07 18:56:19)
It doesn't have to be "paid", so like, teh nyah...
BTW, that's the first word I've misspelled here at BF2S. Sure, you could say that an inability to master the simplicity that is language (as I would), but hell, that word is god damn special. Even Xietsu misspells it. lmao. And yes, it is beside the point.
I misspell that word quite a bit. Shucks.Spumantiii wrote:
asinine
BTW, that's the first word I've misspelled here at BF2S. Sure, you could say that an inability to master the simplicity that is language (as I would), but hell, that word is god damn special. Even Xietsu misspells it. lmao. And yes, it is beside the point.
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-07 18:59:24)
payed is not in the english dictionary, god damn it you made me fucking look it up.
Dude, do you fucking use like...some Merriam Websters bullshit? Everyone knows Lexico is teh pwn. Merriam is like...nooble cake. Oh well, you will learn with time (well, I'm being super optimistic, but you get the idea...kinda'?), my disciple.
(P.S. Based off of your contextual use (seeing as you were not actually commanding that God damn it, you have also made a spelling mistake . Sadnuss is Gunslinger, no? Correct terminology would be "God dammit". But seriously, if you actually wanna' start nit picking on my spelling (that of which is rarely with error), I can help you out, too. )
(P.S. Based off of your contextual use (seeing as you were not actually commanding that God damn it, you have also made a spelling mistake . Sadnuss is Gunslinger, no? Correct terminology would be "God dammit". But seriously, if you actually wanna' start nit picking on my spelling (that of which is rarely with error), I can help you out, too. )
Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-07 19:06:20)
i only brought it up because you seem to very smug with your writing. fuck a spell check i aint getting paid to write on these forums.
LOL. I totally forgot you actually replied in the thread that I'm talking about, with the referenced interview. How "coincidental", you also failed to strain out the crucial, principle mode behind Ahmadenijad's viewpoint there, too. Oh well. The viewers can gain all from this thread that they possibly could about the subject. At least some will leave with an imparted learning, even if it does go unheard.
xietsu you smoke crack defending a wacked out mofo like Ahmadinejad
its on public record reported by many different unbiased sources that he both denied the holocaust ever happened and announced his intent to destroy isreal.
the united states has no intentions of ever letting iran get the bomb and isreal might just take its own actions. there is a window of opportunity where he will have had the time to make one and you can bet action will be taken well before that date
its on public record reported by many different unbiased sources that he both denied the holocaust ever happened and announced his intent to destroy isreal.
the united states has no intentions of ever letting iran get the bomb and isreal might just take its own actions. there is a window of opportunity where he will have had the time to make one and you can bet action will be taken well before that date
sorry im not the dude whom you refer to but thx for the neg i could care lessha you're the idiot that called me a "fat assed bitch hunter mofo" or something
No, it was a British protectorate. And clearly because they had to live under British opression they have less right to have their own country.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
palestine has never been a modern legitimate country, therefore it could never have had its borders removed.
Why shouldn't he. The only sources he has are from the west, whom he has no reason to trust. And it would seem awfully coincidental that this mass murder allowed a little outpost of the west/Christianity (yes, it's Jewish, but to his eyes they are one and the same for all intents and purposes).easy-skanking wrote:
its on public record reported by many different unbiased sources that he both denied the holocaust ever happened
palestine was a british protectorate for less than 30 years, the Ottoman empire had the land for for centuries but yet people wanna still blame the british
So, the British weren't the only ones who opressed them. What does that have to do with why the Jews should be allowed to take over?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
palestine was a british protectorate for less than 30 years, the Ottoman empire had the land for for centuries but yet people wanna still blame the british
Besides, it was the British who bowed down to Jewish terrorists.
Last edited by Bubbalo (2006-06-08 07:44:36)
hmm maybe theres some evidence in the hundreds of pictures and videos showing stacks of dead jews, ovens, and thousand of emaciated jews near death in the camps ?Bubbalo wrote:
Why shouldn't he. The only sources he has are from the west, whom he has no reason to trust. And it would seem awfully coincidental that this mass murder allowed a little outpost of the west/Christianity (yes, it's Jewish, but to his eyes they are one and the same for all intents and purposes).
oh i know ill spin that into it was some awesome day spa and the jews wanted to lose some weight.. nono they paid thousands of jew actors to starve themself near death so they could make a video on the promise to create israel
do a little more reading and learn that the jews have had large migrations to jerusalem 50 years before world war 2 ever happened. also learn the reason israel was created
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaratio … _of_Israel
had the native palestinians chose to live peacefully with the jews then israel wouldnt exist. arab violence against jews is what initiated the creation of a seperate state.
do a little research about mohammad too cuz i did some and it turns out when the jews didnt defend medina with the muslims against the meccans he ordered that the jews be executed and killed some himself... thats some prophet. quite the religion of peace.
just for the record tho im not a jew and i know they play a large role in the problems.