No unorginalnuttah, your attempt to claim that the UN was not acknowledging the threats from Iraq is completely absurd.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Hmmm, did I say that the threat long range missiles would pose wasn't the concern of the resolution? No. I simply pointed out that this statement had no grounds in reality:lowing wrote:
unorginalnuttah, you should have been a biologist the way you disect. The long range missles that could carry WMD's from Iraq was EXACTLY the concern the UN was addressing and you damn well know it. Or are you saying that resolution was NOT meant for Iraq?This isn't the case, and isn't acknowledged in the resolution as you claim. There are significant semantic differences between what the resolution says and what you claim it says. A document like this must be interpreted by the letter, especially if you plan to use it to back up an argument like you attempted to do.lowing wrote:
It was ACCEPTED by the world that the INTEL about the WMD's was accurate!! It wasn't a Bush war monger conspiracy theory.
Someday you may wake up.Mike_J wrote:
Kinda like how you pulled the "Fox News" card on me earlier right? More hypocricy from you I see. If you must know, I don't even have a TV. The other guy I live with has one that is nice enough to let me use his. On top of that, he doesn't even get Fox. Boy I'd love to have that news channel though. Aside from all that nonsense and to the main point of your post, I certainly value my life enough over my belongings to evacuate. I also certainly believe a couple of months is plenty of time to grab what's important enough and get the hell outta there. Even though innocents died, guess who's fault that was? I assume you're smart enough to know it's not ours. I'd also hope you're smart enough to leave your town if criminals came and took over it and you were warned long before that the town was going to be cleaned up by military force. Noone seems to blame the insurgency for the continued fighting. Btw, I have some of the leaflets. They're not exactly as blunt as you seem to think they are with "get the hell out or die." I still do fully believe you have no sense of logic. Perhaps I'm too quick to judge, but maybe you should thoroughly read your previous posts as well as mine cause' you still seem to be highly misinformed on what's going on over there.splixx wrote:
I do value peoples opions I just ignored yours since you choose to come out with guns blazing. Oh no here we go with the 13 year old insults! ACK I feel like I am playing BF2 at this moment.. I am glad you made the comment since I now know who I am dealing with.Mike_J wrote:
Wow this guy has to be one of the top ten idiots I have had the pleasure to converse with. Thanks Gunslinger, but he OBVIOUSLY didn't read a thing we said. What did his most recent post state? Something along the lines of "I value anyone's opinion?" Splixx what are you 13? You're one of the most irrational people I've ever actually listened to. Same with Ironferret. As much as your posts piss me off, I have to remind myself that in the end, who's actually getting their way? I thank God that people like you aren't in charge of anything.
I am irrational? So lets say the US is occupied, they drop some notes to your house tell you to get out of dodge we are going bomb the hell out of your city because it is terrorist infested. In the process you have lost your shop, your home, and let's say your family just did not make it out in time. Or refused since there just was no where to go... Wait... They had 4x5 Tents to live in... So maybe I cant say that since this is prime living for anyone out in the cold. Not to mention 150,000 plus still are living in these camps. So you come back to this rubble, find everyone you loved dead.. parents, sister, brother grandparents... Your house you lived in forever all your posessions too. Everything that meant anything to you. What are you going to do? I bet I know... Your going to retaliate, doing so you have no been labled a terrorist.
Like Bush said... Your either with us... or against us.
If I was in charge I would fire every damn one of those corrupt politicians.
Please come up with something a little better then the 13 year old remarks... I know your a better person then that.
I am just fed up with how things are going.. I support my friends, troops and everyone else invovled in a war they dont want to be in. I am tired of being drug through the mud in this country by the corrrupt politicians that keep stealilng from us. I know someway you are too.
The reason why many UN countries disagree with the US is because the US doesn't honour its commitment to the UN. Very simple reason there.lowing wrote:
Sorry you can call it arrogant if you want, the fact is the UN is made up mostly of countries that do not support the US or are out right hostile toward the US. So basically as a taxpayer and a US citizen who has a voice in our govt. I say screw all of you, and what you THINK we should do with our money and how much of it we should be giving to a bunch of countries that hate us anyway.mikkel wrote:
“In recognition of the special importance of the role that can be fulfilled only by official development assistance, a major part of financial resource transfers to the developing countries should be provided in the form of official development assistance. Each economically advanced country will progressively increase its official development assistance to the developing countries and will exert its best efforts to reach a minimum net amount of 0.7 percent of its gross national product at market prices by the middle of the decade.”lowing wrote:
Please show me where the US is "obligated" to finance its enemies, and explain to me why we should??
Disagreeing with you does not mean your post wasn't read. It also doesn't make anyone arrogant.
(UN 1970, paragraph 43)
There you have it. This 0,7% goal has been reaffirmed by the UN over and over again.
I don't see anyone asking the US to financially support its enemies. Honestly, pulling something like that out of thin air has no place in a sensible discussion.
The problem here is not that you're disagreeing with me. The problem is that you're spoting arguments that have have already been negated by what I've quoted in previous posts, and yes, that does mean that either you don't read my posts, or that you're arrogant.
Honestly, lowing, I don't expect much of you, but posts like that fall drastically short of what I expect from any person. For the last six posts I've explained to you that this is what the US thinks they should do with their money, and this is the amount the US thinks it should donate. This is eerily reminiscent of blind patriotism, with the added twist of ignoring the fact that your government is responsible for what you're complaining about, and instead blaming the rest of the world.
Last edited by mikkel (2006-05-12 14:41:38)
Well we could go 'round and 'round about it. you say everyone hates us because we aren'y doing our part. And I say ( although I think we are doing more than anyone else ) We may not be doing our part because of the hostility toward the US... take your pick. Personally I do not support contributing to an anti American institution such as the UN or the countries that support and finance the demise of our country.mikkel wrote:
The reason why many UN countries disagree with the US is because the US doesn't honour its commitment to the UN. Very simple reason there.lowing wrote:
Sorry you can call it arrogant if you want, the fact is the UN is made up mostly of countries that do not support the US or are out right hostile toward the US. So basically as a taxpayer and a US citizen who has a voice in our govt. I say screw all of you, and what you THINK we should do with our money and how much of it we should be giving to a bunch of countries that hate us anyway.mikkel wrote:
“In recognition of the special importance of the role that can be fulfilled only by official development assistance, a major part of financial resource transfers to the developing countries should be provided in the form of official development assistance. Each economically advanced country will progressively increase its official development assistance to the developing countries and will exert its best efforts to reach a minimum net amount of 0.7 percent of its gross national product at market prices by the middle of the decade.”
(UN 1970, paragraph 43)
There you have it. This 0,7% goal has been reaffirmed by the UN over and over again.
I don't see anyone asking the US to financially support its enemies. Honestly, pulling something like that out of thin air has no place in a sensible discussion.
The problem here is not that you're disagreeing with me. The problem is that you're spoting arguments that have have already been negated by what I've quoted in previous posts, and yes, that does mean that either you don't read my posts, or that you're arrogant.
Honestly, lowing, I don't expect much of you, but posts like that fall drastically short of what I expect from any person. For the last six posts I've explained to you that this is what the US thinks they should do with their money, and this is the amount the US thinks it should donate. This is eerily reminiscent of blind patriotism, with the added twist of ignoring the fact that your government is responsible for what you're complaining about, and instead blaming the rest of the world.
Okay, so pretty much what you're saying now is not only that the US disregarding and dishonouring their alliances and obligations to everyone justifies itself because the countries on the other end of those alliances and obligations would be pissed about it, but what you're also saying is basically that every country other than the US is sponsoring terrorism. I'm very reluctant to continue debating this with someone with that kind of obscure and absurd mindset.lowing wrote:
Well we could go 'round and 'round about it. you say everyone hates us because we aren'y doing our part. And I say ( although I think we are doing more than anyone else ) We may not be doing our part because of the hostility toward the US... take your pick. Personally I do not support contributing to an anti American institution such as the UN or the countries that support and finance the demise of our country.mikkel wrote:
The reason why many UN countries disagree with the US is because the US doesn't honour its commitment to the UN. Very simple reason there.lowing wrote:
Sorry you can call it arrogant if you want, the fact is the UN is made up mostly of countries that do not support the US or are out right hostile toward the US. So basically as a taxpayer and a US citizen who has a voice in our govt. I say screw all of you, and what you THINK we should do with our money and how much of it we should be giving to a bunch of countries that hate us anyway.
Honestly, lowing, I don't expect much of you, but posts like that fall drastically short of what I expect from any person. For the last six posts I've explained to you that this is what the US thinks they should do with their money, and this is the amount the US thinks it should donate. This is eerily reminiscent of blind patriotism, with the added twist of ignoring the fact that your government is responsible for what you're complaining about, and instead blaming the rest of the world.
Nope , what I am saying is I think the US should help its allies and piss on its enemies, plain and simple.mikkel wrote:
Okay, so pretty much what you're saying now is not only that the US disregarding and dishonouring their alliances and obligations to everyone justifies itself because the countries on the other end of those alliances and obligations would be pissed about it, but what you're also saying is basically that every country other than the US is sponsoring terrorism. I'm very reluctant to continue debating this with someone with that kind of obscure and absurd mindset.lowing wrote:
Well we could go 'round and 'round about it. you say everyone hates us because we aren'y doing our part. And I say ( although I think we are doing more than anyone else ) We may not be doing our part because of the hostility toward the US... take your pick. Personally I do not support contributing to an anti American institution such as the UN or the countries that support and finance the demise of our country.mikkel wrote:
The reason why many UN countries disagree with the US is because the US doesn't honour its commitment to the UN. Very simple reason there.
Honestly, lowing, I don't expect much of you, but posts like that fall drastically short of what I expect from any person. For the last six posts I've explained to you that this is what the US thinks they should do with their money, and this is the amount the US thinks it should donate. This is eerily reminiscent of blind patriotism, with the added twist of ignoring the fact that your government is responsible for what you're complaining about, and instead blaming the rest of the world.
I do not think 1 cent of my tax money should go to countries hostile toward the US. Alliances change and so should American commitment to them. Our sovereignty should NOT be bound, or dictated to by the UN.
Also, let me say.....I am NOT IN a debate with you..........I am NOT trying to swing you one way or another. I don't give 2 shits what you think, or think of me or my country. I am TELLING you how I feel about people like you and the corrupt institution called the UN. I also couldn't care less if you are in one of those countries that have been cut off from US support. I kinda hope ya are. There ya go, NOW, you can call me arrogant.
Last edited by lowing (2006-05-12 15:19:44)
lol you're hopeless.splixx wrote:
Someday you may wake up.Mike_J wrote:
Kinda like how you pulled the "Fox News" card on me earlier right? More hypocricy from you I see. If you must know, I don't even have a TV. The other guy I live with has one that is nice enough to let me use his. On top of that, he doesn't even get Fox. Boy I'd love to have that news channel though. Aside from all that nonsense and to the main point of your post, I certainly value my life enough over my belongings to evacuate. I also certainly believe a couple of months is plenty of time to grab what's important enough and get the hell outta there. Even though innocents died, guess who's fault that was? I assume you're smart enough to know it's not ours. I'd also hope you're smart enough to leave your town if criminals came and took over it and you were warned long before that the town was going to be cleaned up by military force. Noone seems to blame the insurgency for the continued fighting. Btw, I have some of the leaflets. They're not exactly as blunt as you seem to think they are with "get the hell out or die." I still do fully believe you have no sense of logic. Perhaps I'm too quick to judge, but maybe you should thoroughly read your previous posts as well as mine cause' you still seem to be highly misinformed on what's going on over there.splixx wrote:
I do value peoples opions I just ignored yours since you choose to come out with guns blazing. Oh no here we go with the 13 year old insults! ACK I feel like I am playing BF2 at this moment.. I am glad you made the comment since I now know who I am dealing with.
I am irrational? So lets say the US is occupied, they drop some notes to your house tell you to get out of dodge we are going bomb the hell out of your city because it is terrorist infested. In the process you have lost your shop, your home, and let's say your family just did not make it out in time. Or refused since there just was no where to go... Wait... They had 4x5 Tents to live in... So maybe I cant say that since this is prime living for anyone out in the cold. Not to mention 150,000 plus still are living in these camps. So you come back to this rubble, find everyone you loved dead.. parents, sister, brother grandparents... Your house you lived in forever all your posessions too. Everything that meant anything to you. What are you going to do? I bet I know... Your going to retaliate, doing so you have no been labled a terrorist.
Like Bush said... Your either with us... or against us.
If I was in charge I would fire every damn one of those corrupt politicians.
Please come up with something a little better then the 13 year old remarks... I know your a better person then that.
I am just fed up with how things are going.. I support my friends, troops and everyone else invovled in a war they dont want to be in. I am tired of being drug through the mud in this country by the corrrupt politicians that keep stealilng from us. I know someway you are too.
I think "idiot" will suffice.lowing wrote:
Nope , what I am saying is I think the US should help its allies and piss on its enemies, plain and simple.mikkel wrote:
Okay, so pretty much what you're saying now is not only that the US disregarding and dishonouring their alliances and obligations to everyone justifies itself because the countries on the other end of those alliances and obligations would be pissed about it, but what you're also saying is basically that every country other than the US is sponsoring terrorism. I'm very reluctant to continue debating this with someone with that kind of obscure and absurd mindset.lowing wrote:
Well we could go 'round and 'round about it. you say everyone hates us because we aren'y doing our part. And I say ( although I think we are doing more than anyone else ) We may not be doing our part because of the hostility toward the US... take your pick. Personally I do not support contributing to an anti American institution such as the UN or the countries that support and finance the demise of our country.
I do not think 1 cent of my tax money should go to countries hostile toward the US. Alliances change and so should American commitment to them. Our sovereignty should NOT be bound, or dictated to by the UN.
Also, let me say.....I am NOT IN a debate with you..........I am NOT trying to swing you one way or another. I don't give 2 shits what you think, or think of me or my country. I am TELLING you how I feel about people like you and the corrupt institution called the UN. I also couldn't care less if you are in one of those countries that have been cut off from US support. I kinda hope ya are. There ya go, NOW, you can call me arrogant.
You're obviously debating since you're trying to counter my points, and it doesn't surprise me that when failing horribly, you fall back on something as tame as what you just said. Again you've not understood a word of what this whole thing is about, and you're just saying the same thing over and over. I do hope and pray that some day you'll be able to think for yourself, and logically at that. If you were just disagreeing with me, it'd be fine and dandy, but you seem incapable of comprehending simple logic, and instead repeat yourself over and over like a headless chicken. I'm sorry, but I can't be bothered with wasting more time on someone as hopelessly inept as you. I'd say I've been very, very patient up until this point.
Last edited by mikkel (2006-05-12 15:29:05)
thank you, have a nice day.mikkel wrote:
I think "idiot" will suffice.lowing wrote:
Nope , what I am saying is I think the US should help its allies and piss on its enemies, plain and simple.mikkel wrote:
Okay, so pretty much what you're saying now is not only that the US disregarding and dishonouring their alliances and obligations to everyone justifies itself because the countries on the other end of those alliances and obligations would be pissed about it, but what you're also saying is basically that every country other than the US is sponsoring terrorism. I'm very reluctant to continue debating this with someone with that kind of obscure and absurd mindset.
I do not think 1 cent of my tax money should go to countries hostile toward the US. Alliances change and so should American commitment to them. Our sovereignty should NOT be bound, or dictated to by the UN.
Also, let me say.....I am NOT IN a debate with you..........I am NOT trying to swing you one way or another. I don't give 2 shits what you think, or think of me or my country. I am TELLING you how I feel about people like you and the corrupt institution called the UN. I also couldn't care less if you are in one of those countries that have been cut off from US support. I kinda hope ya are. There ya go, NOW, you can call me arrogant.
You're obviously debating since you're trying to counter my points, and it doesn't surprise me that when failing horribly, you fall back on something as tame as what you just said. Again you've not understood a word of what this whole thing is about, and you're just saying the same thing over and over. I do hope and pray that some day you'll be able to think for yourself, and logically at that. If you were just disagreeing with me, it'd be fine and dandy, but you seem incapable of comprehending simple logic, and instead repeat yourself over and over like a headless chicken. I'm sorry, but I can't be bothered with wasting more time on someone as hopelessly inept as you.
my last post was response enough to you. It must have been, you didn't address a thing in it.
Last edited by lowing (2006-05-12 15:35:15)
What ever happened to a good old fasion Carpet Bombing. The kind that makes for good war documentry footage.
Instead we have to spend billions trying to be nice to the people who want us dead:
Excuse me for coming to your country because your dictator threatened the world oil supply, but if you stop shooting me for a minute I can unload this truck of food and water for you.
No, I won't go into you Mosque and kill those people that just blew up my buddy's Supply truck and ran in there, I want you to like me so go ahead and throw stones at me.
I hate politicians, they should all have to spend a tour at the lowest rank in any war they vote for, then you would see wars fought diffently or not at all.
Instead we have to spend billions trying to be nice to the people who want us dead:
Excuse me for coming to your country because your dictator threatened the world oil supply, but if you stop shooting me for a minute I can unload this truck of food and water for you.
No, I won't go into you Mosque and kill those people that just blew up my buddy's Supply truck and ran in there, I want you to like me so go ahead and throw stones at me.
I hate politicians, they should all have to spend a tour at the lowest rank in any war they vote for, then you would see wars fought diffently or not at all.
to the person who gave me the - karma......first let me say, I couldn't care less about karma.
now let me address your - karma reason: you said, "you don't know when you're wrong, and you are misquoting me again to try and get out of it. UON"
Now, I have my opinions about the corrupt, anti-american organization called the UN. I feel the US should not pander to such a group. It is not in our best interests to support it . This is my opinion, there are facts to back up my opinion. What you fail to understand is I don't care what the US is obligated to do or give. My point has always been to stop feeding the UN and the enemies of the US within the UN. NOw, you have never in all of my posts acknowledged this.
Also, please show me in any of my posts where I quoted you, let alone, mis-quoted you!!
now let me address your - karma reason: you said, "you don't know when you're wrong, and you are misquoting me again to try and get out of it. UON"
Now, I have my opinions about the corrupt, anti-american organization called the UN. I feel the US should not pander to such a group. It is not in our best interests to support it . This is my opinion, there are facts to back up my opinion. What you fail to understand is I don't care what the US is obligated to do or give. My point has always been to stop feeding the UN and the enemies of the US within the UN. NOw, you have never in all of my posts acknowledged this.
Also, please show me in any of my posts where I quoted you, let alone, mis-quoted you!!
he left the initials to his username at the end of your karma.lowing wrote:
to the person who gave me the - karma......first let me say, I couldn't care less about karma.
now let me address your - karma reason: you said, "you don't know when you're wrong, and you are misquoting me again to try and get out of it. UON"
Now, I have my opinions about the corrupt, anti-american organization called the UN. I feel the US should not pander to such a group. It is not in our best interests to support it . This is my opinion, there are facts to back up my opinion. What you fail to understand is I don't care what the US is obligated to do or give. My point has always been to stop feeding the UN and the enemies of the US within the UN. NOw, you have never in all of my posts acknowledged this.
Also, please show me in any of my posts where I quoted you, let alone, mis-quoted you!!
plus if you dont care why did you make a post about it?
he left his initials??!, his initials and 50 cents will buy me a soda out of the vending machine.the_heart_attack wrote:
he left the initials to his username at the end of your karma.lowing wrote:
to the person who gave me the - karma......first let me say, I couldn't care less about karma.
now let me address your - karma reason: you said, "you don't know when you're wrong, and you are misquoting me again to try and get out of it. UON"
Now, I have my opinions about the corrupt, anti-american organization called the UN. I feel the US should not pander to such a group. It is not in our best interests to support it . This is my opinion, there are facts to back up my opinion. What you fail to understand is I don't care what the US is obligated to do or give. My point has always been to stop feeding the UN and the enemies of the US within the UN. NOw, you have never in all of my posts acknowledged this.
Also, please show me in any of my posts where I quoted you, let alone, mis-quoted you!!
plus if you dont care why did you make a post about it?
I wasn't addressing the - karma. I was responding to a form of post, and since I do not know UON I left it here for him/her to read.
and since when I clicked on the "reason post" i was taken to a mikkel post. I couldn't find a U, O, or an N in that name.
Last edited by lowing (2006-05-13 03:56:47)
Is it that hard to figure out which misquoted person it might be out of all the others or something?
Click the karma to find out the exact post and it should be obvious, even if I hadn't signed it:
"No unorginalnuttah, your attempt to claim that the UN was not acknowledging the threats from Iraq is completely absurd."
Hmm, thought this was the post I did the -1 on.. oh well, if not take the above ^^^ as a correction.
Click the karma to find out the exact post and it should be obvious, even if I hadn't signed it:
"No unorginalnuttah, your attempt to claim that the UN was not acknowledging the threats from Iraq is completely absurd."
Hmm, thought this was the post I did the -1 on.. oh well, if not take the above ^^^ as a correction.
Ok great......Now, just like the "fact" of yours when you said I agreed that you were a racist, I once again challenge you to provide me with a mis-quote or even a quote of you, by me in this thread. Then, just like the last time, i will wait for an apology.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Is it that hard to figure out which misquoted person it might be out of all the others or something?
Click the karma to find out the exact post and it should be obvious, even if I hadn't signed it:
"No unorginalnuttah, your attempt to claim that the UN was not acknowledging the threats from Iraq is completely absurd."
Hmm, thought this was the post I did the -1 on.. oh well, if not take the above ^^^ as a correction.
I searched and only found 1 time that I threw quotes around the word "meaningless" and that was because I was using it in my sentence referring to your sentence. If that is what you are counting as a quote or a mis- quote, you sure are digging deep and are quite desporate searching for an arguement. If that isn't what you are referring to. then post my apology here
Last edited by lowing (2006-05-13 05:34:25)
Did anyone else notice the Part where Mr. Arrogance admitted he couldn't even afford a TV ?
Yet he feels pretty comfortable telling everyone else They are Stupid Nazis and espouses his views on how to " Properly run the Worlds only Super Power "
Pretty typical of the Breed.
Yet he feels pretty comfortable telling everyone else They are Stupid Nazis and espouses his views on how to " Properly run the Worlds only Super Power "
Pretty typical of the Breed.
I accused UnOriginalNuttah of being racist. I have not been able to find the post where I thought he called me a Redneck, So I think I may have been mistaken or gotten him confused with another poster, I apologize to UnOriginalNuttah for the Remark. it seems unfounded. Let this Topic Slide.lowing wrote:
Ok great......Now, just like the "fact" of yours when you said I agreed that you were a racist, I once again challenge you to provide me with a mis-quote or even a quote of you, by me in this thread. Then, just like the last time, i will wait for an apology.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Is it that hard to figure out which misquoted person it might be out of all the others or something?
Click the karma to find out the exact post and it should be obvious, even if I hadn't signed it:
"No unorginalnuttah, your attempt to claim that the UN was not acknowledging the threats from Iraq is completely absurd."
Hmm, thought this was the post I did the -1 on.. oh well, if not take the above ^^^ as a correction.
I searched and only found 1 time that I threw quotes around the word "meaningless" and that was because I was using it in my sentence referring to your sentence. If that is what you are counting as a quote or a mis- quote, you sure are digging deep and are quite desporate searching for an arguement. If that isn't what you are referring to. then post my apology here
Don't know what you 'searched' for, but I've posted the exact sentence where you say I've have made claims that don't reflect what I've actually said.lowing wrote:
I searched and only found 1 time that I threw quotes around the word "meaningless" and that was because I was using it in my sentence referring to your sentence. If that is what you are counting as a quote or a mis- quote, you sure are digging deep and are quite desporate searching for an arguement. If that isn't what you are referring to. then post my apology here
Give up. I defined precisely what the actual language of the threats the UN document you posted recognised, and you are now saying that I am claiming they haven't acknowledged any. I've got a feeling there's no point in even explaining this to you, you will probably read something different from that as well.
To clear some things up here...
The cat goes 'meow.'
The dog goes 'woof.'
The cow goes 'moo.'
The pig goes 'oink.'
The chicken goes 'cluck.'
The mouse goes 'squeak.'
Et cetera.
Hope that helps.
The cat goes 'meow.'
The dog goes 'woof.'
The cow goes 'moo.'
The pig goes 'oink.'
The chicken goes 'cluck.'
The mouse goes 'squeak.'
Et cetera.
Hope that helps.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-05-13 08:47:18)
you are doing this already!JaMDuDe wrote:
I say we drop a few bombs and save America and Europe and all world problems are gone
real christian attitude, little hippocrate.JaMDuDe wrote:
I say we drop a few bombs and save America and Europe and all world problems are gone
Again show them to me I know what I said to you and I never quoted you or mis-quoted you. Unless now, with you, disagreeing with you on the meaning of a paragragh is a mis-quote. Still waiting for apology...Lets make this one public not like the last one.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Don't know what you 'searched' for, but I've posted the exact sentence where you say I've have made claims that don't reflect what I've actually said.lowing wrote:
I searched and only found 1 time that I threw quotes around the word "meaningless" and that was because I was using it in my sentence referring to your sentence. If that is what you are counting as a quote or a mis- quote, you sure are digging deep and are quite desporate searching for an arguement. If that isn't what you are referring to. then post my apology here
Give up. I defined precisely what the actual language of the threats the UN document you posted recognised, and you are now saying that I am claiming they haven't acknowledged any. I've got a feeling there's no point in even explaining this to you, you will probably read something different from that as well.
If I say:lowing wrote:
Again show them to me I know what I said to you and I never quoted you or mis-quoted you. Unless now, with you, disagreeing with you on the meaning of a paragragh is a mis-quote. Still waiting for apology...Lets make this one public not like the last one.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Don't know what you 'searched' for, but I've posted the exact sentence where you say I've have made claims that don't reflect what I've actually said.lowing wrote:
I searched and only found 1 time that I threw quotes around the word "meaningless" and that was because I was using it in my sentence referring to your sentence. If that is what you are counting as a quote or a mis- quote, you sure are digging deep and are quite desporate searching for an arguement. If that isn't what you are referring to. then post my apology here
Give up. I defined precisely what the actual language of the threats the UN document you posted recognised, and you are now saying that I am claiming they haven't acknowledged any. I've got a feeling there's no point in even explaining this to you, you will probably read something different from that as well.
lowing, your claim that there are magical flying pigs hovering over this thread of the forum is ridiculous
^^^ Misquoting.
mine was as public as you can get.
sorry unorginalnuttah..........disagreeing with you on the meaning of anything is NOT a mis-quote.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
If I say:lowing wrote:
Again show them to me I know what I said to you and I never quoted you or mis-quoted you. Unless now, with you, disagreeing with you on the meaning of a paragragh is a mis-quote. Still waiting for apology...Lets make this one public not like the last one.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Don't know what you 'searched' for, but I've posted the exact sentence where you say I've have made claims that don't reflect what I've actually said.
Give up. I defined precisely what the actual language of the threats the UN document you posted recognised, and you are now saying that I am claiming they haven't acknowledged any. I've got a feeling there's no point in even explaining this to you, you will probably read something different from that as well.
lowing, your claim that there are magical flying pigs hovering over this thread of the forum is ridiculous
^^^ Misquoting.
My favorite thing, that you are famous for, is when someone makes a valid point, you ignore it and take the discussion in a whole new direction. I loveeeeeeeeeee that!