если я чешу в затылке не беда
в голове моей опилки да да да
в голове моей опилки да да да
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
i dont think you understand theTy wrote:
A real Christian doesn't question Christianity huh? At all? Not even a little crisis of faith once in a while? Hmm, judging by the Book of Job maybe not - that's harsh.HaiBai wrote:
>"I can assure you I was a devout fundamentalist Christian"
>"was taught not to question it"
pick 1
oh my what a fucking idiot. it took him 5 months to go from a 'Christian' to an atheist? i'm surprised it didn't take him a week. it would've taken me a day if i believed in the 'facts' that he talked about
lol that he thinks every non-christian will go to hell. i'm almost positive that was done some guy looking to whore karma on reddit
Not the most positive message though; an unquestioning obedience to an all-seeing authority under all circumstances. Where have I heard that before?
To be honest I don't think the "Non-Christians go to Hell" is the main concern. I mean it's a troubling thing but the plot-holes can be filled in neatly enough I suppose. It wouldn't be the most concerning thing for me anyway, I go after the big dog himself. See as groovy as Jesus was about healing the sick and giving to the poor, (two things that seem to have been lost in translation in modern society,) and as pleasantly different as this was to the wrathful God in the Old Testament that was so keen on blood and death it should be noted that before Jesus came along the dead were free from punishment. God may smite you in life but once you were dead that was it. Not until Jesus came along did the concept of eternal damnation come into being. That's his one flaw, one of the few thing that paints Jesus in a less-than-glowing light. And lets be clear here, eternal damnation isn't just reserved for the most evil people. In fact the worst thing, (as is repeatedly said,) is to question God. Commit genocide in the name of God sure, but questioning Him lands you in eternal suffering and torment? That's eternal we're talking about here, that's a pretty excessive punishment. And for doing nothing worse than what I'm doing now. Nothing about that seems moral or just or ethical or even logical to me.
That's just one thing but in brief there is more enough in religion itself that could make anyone question belief and even the reason for belief, (is this religion true and/or is there any reason for one to have faith in this religion?) If one were to look at outside sources there is even more evidence that calls things into question. And though I would never want to destroy anyone's faith and try not to indulge my more "militant atheist", (read: annoying,) side I certainly think that even I could formulate an argument that would make even the most staunch believer question their faith, even if only a little. It's not that hard really, there's a lot to work with and people don't often realise that they're not as religious as they thought they were, a little prod can be more than enough to change one's outlook.
try meTy wrote:
I certainly think that even I could formulate an argument that would make even the most staunch believer question their faith, even if only a little. It's not that hard really, there's a lot to work with and people don't often realise that they're not as religious as they thought they were, a little prod can be more than enough to change one's outlook.
That makes a whole lotta christians idiotic then, by your own adminssionHaiBai wrote:
thing, or maybe i don't understand it. either way, i was saying that he cannot be a "devout Christian fundamendalist" and then proceed to say he was "taught not to question it". that's idiotic.
yep. there's a lot of idiotic atheists out there as well. actually, there's lots of idiots out there, period.jord wrote:
That makes a whole lotta christians idiotic then, by your own adminssionHaiBai wrote:
thing, or maybe i don't understand it. either way, i was saying that he cannot be a "devout Christian fundamendalist" and then proceed to say he was "taught not to question it". that's idiotic.
i rage so hard at some of the shit that they post there. they're so clueless sometimes and there's nothing i can do about it
Well give me some credit here HaiBai, am I not wrong to suggest that one of the key tenets of Christianity, (and most religions,) is obedience? The first five of the Ten Commandments are all about obedience to authority for starters. The very notion of faith, which is belief without evidence, suggests obedience. The Bible is full of references to people rewarded or praised for unquestioning obedience and punished for even the smallest bit of doubt or defiance - you talk about grains of salt, what about pillars? You're going to have to explain to me where it says or even suggests that questioning your faith is a good thing.HaiBai wrote:
i dont think you understand the
>option 1
>option 2
pick 1
thing, or maybe i don't understand it. either way, i was saying that he cannot be a "devout Christian fundamendalist" and then proceed to say he was "taught not to question it". that's idiotic.
you think committing genocide in the name of god is ok? wtf are you talking about? you're supposed to question your faith. the entire basis of your post is misguided. i'm going to treat the remainder of your post as a grain of salt because you obviously don't know what you're talking about
See with you there seems to be little point as I'm not sure about the extent of your belief and I don't want to make any assumptions. As far as I can tell you consider yourself devoutly religious but don't take Biblical messages absolutely literally, you appreciate the antiquity of many moral lessons and can consider them in a modern context and you don't accept religion as science. You're a modern enlightened Christian if there is such a thing. But of course you do believe in the seemingly key things - Jesus' existence/divinity, the existence of a God, an Afterlife and a divine plan for everything. To me it seems that your personal belief has less to do with the bricks-and-mortar religion itself than you realise. You shape the religion to your own beliefs more than the religion shapes your beliefs to be in line with it. This is just an impression though and like I said I'd have to actually understand the extent of your own beliefs before I commented any further.HaiBai wrote:
try meTy wrote:
I certainly think that even I could formulate an argument that would make even the most staunch believer question their faith, even if only a little. It's not that hard really, there's a lot to work with and people don't often realise that they're not as religious as they thought they were, a little prod can be more than enough to change one's outlook.
Adams_BJ wrote:
I think that's a case of bringing religion into the 21st century. Its not the middle ages anymore. People can have a real and fulfilling marriage that fails.HaiBai wrote:
that's because a true marriage can't be broken up, and shouldn't have the need to be broken up. if two people need to split apart after they were married, how can you really call that a true marriage?Adams_BJ wrote:
I think that's silly.
you're allowed to pretend it never existed, but not allowed to say it existed, didn't work and so you broke up?
Anyway, I think this a case for the ROTW thread, rather than here. It started of in here but not anymore.
the fuck are you talking aboutSuperior Mind wrote:
Gods or none, that glandular tickle one gets in the brain from prayer/chanting/meditation is at least a healthy feeling.
it's too late for you anywayShahter wrote:
can just as well be achieved by means not involving making an idiot out of oneself.
Last edited by War Man (2012-02-14 19:15:45)
its so difficult to fake that rightHaiBai wrote:
no thanks
i mean, it's not like im a leader of a youth group, have 500 hours of community service for my church, or have been altar serving since i was in second grade.
oh wait
Thou shalt not judge.War Man wrote:
Haibai, just admit you are not Christian because you lack a Christian attitude.
idgaf if you dont believe menukchebi0 wrote:
its so difficult to fake that rightHaiBai wrote:
no thanks
i mean, it's not like im a leader of a youth group, have 500 hours of community service for my church, or have been altar serving since i was in second grade.
oh wait
if the old testament wasnt important it shouldnt be part of official doctrineMacbeth wrote:
Old testament and new testament theology were formed around different times in the history of the Jews. Meh
Can we talk about how much the Christian right sucks for while?
Anyone agree/disagree?To all my nonbelieving, sort-of-believing, and used-to-be-believing friends: I feel like I should begin with a confession. I am sorry that so often the biggest obstacle to God has been Christians. Christians who have had so much to say with our mouths and so little to show with our lives. I am sorry that so often we have forgotten the Christ of our Christianity.
Forgive us. Forgive us for the embarrassing things we have done in the name of God.
The other night I headed into downtown Philly for a stroll with some friends from out of town. We walked down to Penn's Landing along the river, where there are street performers, artists, musicians. We passed a great magician who did some pretty sweet tricks like pour change out of his iPhone, and then there was a preacher. He wasn't quite as captivating as the magician. He stood on a box, yelling into a microphone, and beside him was a coffin with a fake dead body inside. He talked about how we are all going to die and go to hell if we don't know Jesus.
Some folks snickered. Some told him to shut the hell up. A couple of teenagers tried to steal the dead body in the coffin. All I could do was think to myself, I want to jump up on a box beside him and yell at the top of my lungs, "God is not a monster." Maybe next time I will.
The more I have read the Bible and studied the life of Jesus, the more I have become convinced that Christianity spreads best not through force but through fascination. But over the past few decades our Christianity, at least here in the United States, has become less and less fascinating. We have given the atheists less and less to disbelieve. And the sort of Christianity many of us have seen on TV and heard on the radio looks less and less like Jesus.
At one point Gandhi was asked if he was a Christian, and he said, essentially, "I sure love Jesus, but the Christians seem so unlike their Christ." A recent study showed that the top three perceptions of Christians in the U. S. among young non-Christians are that Christians are 1) antigay, 2) judgmental, and 3) hypocritical. So what we have here is a bit of an image crisis, and much of that reputation is well deserved. That's the ugly stuff. And that's why I begin by saying that I'm sorry.
Now for the good news.
I want to invite you to consider that maybe the televangelists and street preachers are wrong — and that God really is love. Maybe the fruits of the Spirit really are beautiful things like peace, patience, kindness, joy, love, goodness, and not the ugly things that have come to characterize religion, or politics, for that matter. (If there is anything I have learned from liberals and conservatives, it's that you can have great answers and still be mean... and that just as important as being right is being nice.)
The Bible that I read says that God did not send Jesus to condemn the world but to save it... it was because "God so loved the world." That is the God I know, and I long for others to know. I did not choose to devote my life to Jesus because I was scared to death of hell or because I wanted crowns in heaven... but because he is good. For those of you who are on a sincere spiritual journey, I hope that you do not reject Christ because of Christians. We have always been a messed-up bunch, and somehow God has survived the embarrassing things we do in His name. At the core of our "Gospel" is the message that Jesus came "not [for] the healthy... but the sick." And if you choose Jesus, may it not be simply because of a fear of hell or hope for mansions in heaven.
Don't get me wrong, I still believe in the afterlife, but too often all the church has done is promise the world that there is life after death and use it as a ticket to ignore the hells around us. I am convinced that the Christian Gospel has as much to do with this life as the next, and that the message of that Gospel is not just about going up when we die but about bringing God's Kingdom down. It was Jesus who taught us to pray that God's will be done "on earth as it is in heaven." On earth.
One of Jesus' most scandalous stories is the story of the Good Samaritan. As sentimental as we may have made it, the original story was about a man who gets beat up and left on the side of the road. A priest passes by. A Levite, the quintessential religious guy, also passes by on the other side (perhaps late for a meeting at church). And then comes the Samaritan... you can almost imagine a snicker in the Jewish crowd. Jews did not talk to Samaritans, or even walk through Samaria. But the Samaritan stops and takes care of the guy in the ditch and is lifted up as the hero of the story. I'm sure some of the listeners were ticked. According to the religious elite, Samaritans did not keep the right rules, and they did not have sound doctrine... but Jesus shows that true faith has to work itself out in a way that is Good News to the most bruised and broken person lying in the ditch.
It is so simple, but the pious forget this lesson constantly. God may indeed be evident in a priest, but God is just as likely to be at work through a Samaritan or a prostitute. In fact the Scripture is brimful of God using folks like a lying prostitute named Rahab, an adulterous king named David... at one point God even speaks to a guy named Balaam through his donkey. Some say God spoke to Balaam through his ass and has been speaking through asses ever since. So if God should choose to use us, then we should be grateful but not think too highly of ourselves. And if upon meeting someone we think God could never use, we should think again.
After all, Jesus says to the religious elite who looked down on everybody else: "The tax collectors and prostitutes are entering the Kingdom ahead of you." And we wonder what got him killed?
I have a friend in the UK who talks about "dirty theology" — that we have a God who is always using dirt to bring life and healing and redemption, a God who shows up in the most unlikely and scandalous ways. After all, the whole story begins with God reaching down from heaven, picking up some dirt, and breathing life into it. At one point, Jesus takes some mud, spits in it, and wipes it on a blind man's eyes to heal him. (The priests and producers of anointing oil were not happy that day.)
In fact, the entire story of Jesus is about a God who did not just want to stay "out there" but who moves into the neighborhood, a neighborhood where folks said, "Nothing good could come." It is this Jesus who was accused of being a glutton and drunkard and rabble-rouser for hanging out with all of society's rejects, and who died on the imperial cross of Rome reserved for bandits and failed messiahs. This is why the triumph over the cross was a triumph over everything ugly we do to ourselves and to others. It is the final promise that love wins.
It is this Jesus who was born in a stank manger in the middle of a genocide. That is the God that we are just as likely to find in the streets as in the sanctuary, who can redeem revolutionaries and tax collectors, the oppressed and the oppressors... a God who is saving some of us from the ghettos of poverty, and some of us from the ghettos of wealth.
In closing, to those who have closed the door on religion — I was recently asked by a non-Christian friend if I thought he was going to hell. I said, "I hope not. It will be hard to enjoy heaven without you." If those of us who believe in God do not believe God's grace is big enough to save the whole world... well, we should at least pray that it is.
Your brother,
Shane