What would you like it see?
Poll
Bf3s Server Rotation
| 32 Man Rush | 3% | 3% - 1 | ||||
| 32 Man Conquest | 50% | 50% - 15 | ||||
| 32 Man Rotation Rush+Conquest | 30% | 30% - 9 | ||||
| 32+ | 16% | 16% - 5 | ||||
| Total: 30 | ||||||
Conquest would be the most popular and need the least administering
No one likes switching between conquest ans rush anyway
If we're doing 32 man it has to be rush/conquest mix. They've made the gamemode better in this game compared to BC2. I actually enjoy playing rush now lol.
Otherwise 64 man conquest.
Otherwise 64 man conquest.
Last edited by Roc18 (2011-11-01 18:17:29)
vote brah
havent played the game, but since im pretty sure its similar to bc2, rush is fucking gay
Nah nigga the maps are much better. Playing rush isn't as shitty.gurdeep wrote:
havent played the game, but since im pretty sure its similar to bc2, rush is fucking gay
>implying the maps had much to do with rush being whack as fuck
That was the whole reason it sucked for me. Most of the rush maps were way to big, Actama Desert rush and Arica Harbor rush are the perfect examples, I remember one map where rush was good in BC2 but I don't remember the name of it. In BF3 most of the maps i've played rush on were enjoyable, especially Tehran Highway.gurdeep wrote:
>implying the maps had much to do with rush being whack as fuck
Last edited by Roc18 (2011-11-01 18:38:19)
64 player conquest with BF2ish settings (no 3d spotting, no health regen, FF on, no killcam) is working well for us. It's a pretty fun way to play bf3 tbh.
Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
64 player conquest with BF2ish settings (no 3d spotting, no health regen, FF on, no killcam) is working well for us. It's a pretty fun way to play bf3 tbh.
FF needs to be off and killcam on or the game is total shit.
Definitely old school BF2 style.Adams_BJ wrote:
Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
64 player conquest with BF2ish settings (no 3d spotting, no health regen, FF on, no killcam) is working well for us. It's a pretty fun way to play bf3 tbh.
Not really.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
FF needs to be off and killcam on or the game is total shit.
Large conquest, set the tickets at higher than 400 though (5-600 should do) so the round last 30-45 mins instead.
You negros best turn FF OFF in the server
stats r lyfe. FF off = no nade spamming fuck yeh.Roc18 wrote:
You negros best turn FF OFF in the server
Well if you liked getting sniped and killed by your own retarded team then yes, it is better.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Not really.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
FF needs to be off and killcam on or the game is total shit.
Not necessarily. Nade spam happens whether FF is on or off. You just risk killing your own teammates with it on.Cybargs wrote:
stats r lyfe. FF off = no nade spamming fuck yeh.Roc18 wrote:
You negros best turn FF OFF in the server
I very rarely get teamkilled. I don't know what retarded server you're playing on but about the only time I regularly get teamkilled is on Metro. And that map is AIDS.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Well if you liked getting sniped and killed by your own retarded team then yes, it is better.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Not really.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
FF needs to be off and killcam on or the game is total shit.
I prefer conquest over rush, but I will play either.
I got teamkilled like 10 times playing on the AU server with Nexus. Most of those teamkills came from being ran over by tanks/cars by my own teammates. Please do not have FF on in this server.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
I very rarely get teamkilled. I don't know what retarded server you're playing on but about the only time I regularly get teamkilled is on Metro. And that map is AIDS.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Well if you liked getting sniped and killed by your own retarded team then yes, it is better.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
Not really.
Or have it on but at a lower damage (50%) or something?
What surge said, I like to tk people that deserve it, but 50% means less unintentional tks.
FF off for mines too if there's an option for that?