dayarath wrote:
the best threads always get locked down D:
how does one respond to that?DilbertX wrote:
You don't care that your buddies died for lies?
on this forum, anything that you do respond to that statement will get you banned.
do me next, because my response is -
"fuck off and die, troll"
Probably best to not respond/feed the troll.
The thread that came from was closed for a reason...that statement and the inevitable responses it would elicit, primarily.
The thread that came from was closed for a reason...that statement and the inevitable responses it would elicit, primarily.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Well you don't have to fall into a troll trap and turn into a kicking and screaming child, but I know you want to be an internet martyrburnzz wrote:
how does one respond to that?DilbertX wrote:
You don't care that your buddies died for lies?
on this forum, anything that you do respond to that statement will get you banned.
do me next, because my response is -
"fuck off and die, troll"
dilbert's hatred of all things american is well known, except lady gaga of course, but regardless of nationality - when does this shit stop being so one sided?
I gotta agree. He's gone well past trolling and is just straight preaching hate.burnzz wrote:
dilbert's hatred of all things american is well known, except lady gaga of course, but regardless of nationality - when does this shit stop being so one sided?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
It's not one sided really. Post intelligently and don't turn into a wild animal.burnzz wrote:
dilbert's hatred of all things american is well known, except lady gaga of course, but regardless of nationality - when does this shit stop being so one sided?
If there there is a thread that you feel is a just trollish topic, don't post in it. If you feel the thread is merit-less in DAST, report it stating why.
Why are you protecting Dilbert? Why did marine get banned for rightfully calling him a cunt in response?jsnipy wrote:
It's not one sided really. Post intelligently and don't turn into a wild animal.burnzz wrote:
dilbert's hatred of all things american is well known, except lady gaga of course, but regardless of nationality - when does this shit stop being so one sided?
If there there is a thread that you feel is a just trollish topic, don't post in it. If you feel the thread is merit-less in DAST, report it stating why.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Why do you assume he is being protected?JohnG@lt wrote:
Why are you protecting Dilbert? Why did marine get banned for rightfully calling him a cunt in response?jsnipy wrote:
It's not one sided really. Post intelligently and don't turn into a wild animal.burnzz wrote:
dilbert's hatred of all things american is well known, except lady gaga of course, but regardless of nationality - when does this shit stop being so one sided?
If there there is a thread that you feel is a just trollish topic, don't post in it. If you feel the thread is merit-less in DAST, report it stating why.
Because on any other forum in the world he would've been banned a long time ago. All he does is come here and troll. Now he's gone beyond trolling and he's no better than the WBC everyone here claims to despise. Fuck him and his hate.jsnipy wrote:
Why do you assume he is being protected?JohnG@lt wrote:
Why are you protecting Dilbert? Why did marine get banned for rightfully calling him a cunt in response?jsnipy wrote:
It's not one sided really. Post intelligently and don't turn into a wild animal.
If there there is a thread that you feel is a just trollish topic, don't post in it. If you feel the thread is merit-less in DAST, report it stating why.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
i don't want to be a martyr, i simply asked why.
you*re response is "Post intelligently".
good luck with that, and don't think i don't relish the irony.
imma leave you with a picture of a far nicer place, which makes as much sense as your bourbon laden posts
you*re response is "Post intelligently".
good luck with that, and don't think i don't relish the irony.
imma leave you with a picture of a far nicer place, which makes as much sense as your bourbon laden posts
Dilbertx wrote:
In fairness so would Uzique, me, 11b, and a bunch of others by now.JohnG@lt wrote:
Because on any other forum in the world he would've been banned a long time ago.
No, you guys are annoying sometimes. You're not sitting in your basement posting hate speech on the message board.Macbeth wrote:
In fairness so would Uzique, me, 11b, and a bunch of others by now.JohnG@lt wrote:
Because on any other forum in the world he would've been banned a long time ago.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Maybe being able to post in DAST should be a privilege
What about lowing?JohnG@lt wrote:
No, you guys are annoying sometimes. You're not sitting in your basement posting hate speech on the message board.Macbeth wrote:
In fairness so would Uzique, me, 11b, and a bunch of others by now.JohnG@lt wrote:
Because on any other forum in the world he would've been banned a long time ago.
He's not a troll. He's just stubborn as ten mules.AussieReaper wrote:
What about lowing?JohnG@lt wrote:
No, you guys are annoying sometimes. You're not sitting in your basement posting hate speech on the message board.Macbeth wrote:
In fairness so would Uzique, me, 11b, and a bunch of others by now.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
i think this forum takes what it can get in terms of members. just enough so it doesn't turn into a total riot and keeps the place alive...at least until bf3. right around that time if more and more people sign up and become regulars they'll be more trigger happy with that ban button(hehehehehe, geddit). any other forum and half the members would have already been thrown out.
Trolling or asking questions to which you have no coherent answer, and respond with insults?JohnG@lt wrote:
Because on any other forum in the world he would've been banned a long time ago. All he does is come here and troll. Now he's gone beyond trolling and he's no better than the WBC everyone here claims to despise.
Many of you are as bad as lowing, dodging questions and responding with personal attacks and paper-thin mantra you haven't really looked into too deeply. lowings endless anti-islam rants with nothing behind them but religionofpeace.org are about the pits.
I'm honestly suprised that the veterans here (including those who signed up just for the money ), aren't livid angry about the triple fiascos of 9/11, Afghanistan and Iraq. People really have died, brave men, idealists, people of principle trying to do good, in which I include the vast majority of the military, and they've been wasted.
All three are open issues, AQ is still active, Islamic terrorism isn't falling, Iraq and Afghanistan are nowhere near fixed, Bush, Blair, Cheney, Rumsfeld etc are away free, making millions and living like kings.
I'm angry, and still want answers, if you don't care then stay out of the threads.
As for usmarine, its only recently that his and GS's relentless and nasty trolling, which I have been advised got a free pass from the mods, seems to have come down a notch. G@lts level of personal insults has surpassed even GS.
Why supposed veterans feel the need to pick on video-gamers, and come back after multiple perma-bans is beyond me frankly.
Trolling in the NZ earthquake thread is unfathomable, and its not an isolated example.
He gives at least as good as he gets, if a troll gets trolled too bad.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-02-24 23:52:42)
Fuck Israel
Aaaaaaaaand you posting my pictures from the "what does BF2s look like" thread in order to create some method of discrediting me would have you welcomed? If it were someone like FEOS, Spark or Turq on this "I'm the superior debater" shtick, I'd agree. Coming from you it's hilarious. At least as of late. Going back to your argument with Uzique in the political thought thread, if you're really so much better than him and a much more civil debater, why did you make a dig at his gf? And as Zeek so correctly pointed out in the Israel thread, you were adamantly defending the Jewish homeland - all the while making anti-semitic remarks against me. Someone who was never even Bar Mitzvah'd. Not to mention the Trump thread where it all started, where you claimed I wasn't "welcome" in DST. You've been on this forum for not even 2 years. Do you really think anyone here gives a fuck if you don't welcome them or not? Your word, nor your opinion have any kind of authority here.JohnG@lt wrote:
Because on any other forum in the world he would've been banned a long time ago. All he does is come here and troll. Now he's gone beyond trolling and he's no better than the WBC everyone here claims to despise. Fuck him and his hate.jsnipy wrote:
Why do you assume he is being protected?JohnG@lt wrote:
Why are you protecting Dilbert? Why did marine get banned for rightfully calling him a cunt in response?
I don't really get it, either. The first year or so you were on here, most people didn't have a problem with you. Then as of late you developed this superiority complex - thinking you were some kind of demigod due to your education over people on a gaming forum mostly inhabited by teens and people in their early 20's. I'm sure you're better educated than I am. I'm a Freshman in college, you're a 24(?) year old college grad. Doesn't make you better than anyone else. We used to have pretty civil discussions. Then you just went berserk. Unlike some people on here, I actually come on here to just chat with other people. I try not to put others down because I do know there's someone behind the words, and the only time you'll see me do it is if the person either really, really deserves it or shot something at me first. I guess it's just not like that for some people.
Last edited by Poseidon (2011-02-24 23:06:48)
burnzz wrote:
how does one respond to that?DilbertX wrote:
You don't care that your buddies died for lies?
How does one respond to that?JohnG@lt wrote:
Go whack off to mental images of your childhood molestation.
I wasn't BTW, not that it matters.
Or that?11b wrote:
Go gag on slave cock
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-02-25 00:03:41)
Fuck Israel
"dodging questions and responding with personal attacks and paper thin mantra"? Now c'mon Dilbert, I don't think that is a fair saying I respond with personal attacks. THat is not to say I haven't, but it is extremely rare that I do. and it is far less than what I am subjected to.Dilbert_X wrote:
Trolling or asking questions to which you have no coherent answer, and respond with insults?JohnG@lt wrote:
Because on any other forum in the world he would've been banned a long time ago. All he does is come here and troll. Now he's gone beyond trolling and he's no better than the WBC everyone here claims to despise.
Many of you are as bad as lowing, dodging questions and responding with personal attacks and paper-thin mantra you haven't really looked into too deeply. lowings endless anti-islam rants with nothing behind them but religionofpeace.org are about the pits.
I'm honestly suprised that the veterans here (including those who signed up just for the money ), aren't livid angry about the triple fiascos of 9/11, Afghanistan and Iraq. People really have died, brave men, idealists, people of principle trying to do good, in which I include the vast majority of the military, and they've been wasted.
All three are open issues, AQ is still active, Islamic terrorism isn't falling, Iraq and Afghanistan are nowhere near fixed, Bush, Blair, Cheney, Rumsfeld etc are away free, making millions and living like kings.
I'm angry, and still want answers, if you don't care then stay out of the threads.
As for usmarine, its only recently that his and GS's relentless and nasty trolling, which I have been advised got a free pass from the mods, seems to have come down a notch. G@lts level of personal insults has surpassed even GS.
Why supposed veterans feel the need to pick on video-gamers, and come back after multiple perma-bans is beyond me frankly.
Trolling in the NZ earthquake thread is unfathomable, and its not an isolated example.
He gives at least as good as he gets, if a troll gets trolled too bad.
I use religionofpeace a lot because it is a one stop shop for everything that goes on in the world regarding Islamic violence. Now, as I have said before, if there is information there that you want to challenge, then pick as many events as you would like, and argue against it. I would love to read it. Just please stop trashing the source and start trashing the information if you can.
I do give you kudos for one thing however and it is a big one. You have finally stopped saying I bash "all Muslims" and started calling what I do anti-Islam. In that you are so very correct. I am way more calm in this forum than you are Dilbert, so before you analyze everyone else, you probably should start with yourself and fix your own forum behavior.
As far as your opinions about 911 Iraq and Afghanistan, the wars were are justified. Iraq was more than WMD's, if you are so concerned about human life than applaud the coalition for taking a relentless tyrant and his sons. The war in Afghanistan is justified because it was allied to the 911 planners and harbored them.
Bush Chaney Rumsfeld and Blair were already making millions before any of those wars, what do you have against success now?
By the way you were saying it, you were insinuating they died for nothing. They didn't.Dilbert_X wrote:
Trolling or asking questions to which you have no coherent answer, and respond with insults?JohnG@lt wrote:
Because on any other forum in the world he would've been banned a long time ago. All he does is come here and troll. Now he's gone beyond trolling and he's no better than the WBC everyone here claims to despise.
Many of you are as bad as lowing, dodging questions and responding with personal attacks and paper-thin mantra you haven't really looked into too deeply. lowings endless anti-islam rants with nothing behind them but religionofpeace.org are about the pits.
I'm honestly suprised that the veterans here (including those who signed up just for the money ), aren't livid angry about the triple fiascos of 9/11, Afghanistan and Iraq. People really have died, brave men, idealists, people of principle trying to do good, in which I include the vast majority of the military, and they've been wasted.
All three are open issues, AQ is still active, Islamic terrorism isn't falling, Iraq and Afghanistan are nowhere near fixed, Bush, Blair, Cheney, Rumsfeld etc are away free, making millions and living like kings.
I'm angry, and still want answers, if you don't care then stay out of the threads.
As for usmarine, its only recently that his and GS's relentless and nasty trolling, which I have been advised got a free pass from the mods, seems to have come down a notch. G@lts level of personal insults has surpassed even GS.
Why supposed veterans feel the need to pick on video-gamers, and come back after multiple perma-bans is beyond me frankly.
Trolling in the NZ earthquake thread is unfathomable, and its not an isolated example.
He gives at least as good as he gets, if a troll gets trolled too bad.
Was Saddam a danger to his own people? Yes
Was Saddam a danger to his neighbours? Yes
Did Saddam have biological weapons? Yes
Did Saddam have chemical weapons? Yes
Was he a security threat to western interests? Probably
Did Saddam have a nuclear program? Assumed, but never found.
Fair enough, the reasons given by the administration were weak and they royally fucked up what they were actually supposed to do; wipe out extremism in Afghanistan. They fucked up, they fucked up good and they themselves set the precedent for the war with Iraq - yes, the US were, in this case, agressors. The tactics used were bad - you can argue about all that and have a point, but they did NOT outright lie. Curveball is but one source in many. And arguably, everyone will be better off without Saddam.
I saw this comment on a vietnam video, the war was in many ways much more terrible than Iraq, but if we look at the public's hate for it - much the same. If there were a draft nowadays you'd have seen protests and riots all throughout the US. I'm certain though, that this will apply to Iraq in the future aswell;
Don't you ever go around saying hateful stuff like that again.What did we win or prove? We finished a world committment to stop oppression and the expansion of communist rule. So I am told and like you all wondered for years why all my friends perished there along with my heart and a lot of my soul. I wondered for years about that question. I went back last year to try an put to rest all the pain. I am glad i did with several others, navy army ect. We won, I promise, what a wonderful place this has become. Makes you heart warm that somthing good came
inane little opines
That's not what the Coalition went into Afghanistan to do. Common misconception.dayarath wrote:
they royally fucked up what they were actually supposed to do; wipe out extremism in Afghanistan.
It went into Afghanistan to remove the Taliban and eliminate Afghanistan as a safe haven for AQ while disrupting/degrading/destroying the AQ network. All of those things have been done, and quite well. The problem with Afghanistan is what is known as "mission creep."
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
I realize that, the military and CIA did a fantastic job at hunting down AQ worldwide, but the goal was to make sure that Afghanistan wouldn't return to being a safe haven for the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, right?FEOS wrote:
That's not what the Coalition went into Afghanistan to do. Common misconception.
It went into Afghanistan to remove the Taliban and eliminate Afghanistan as a safe haven for AQ while disrupting/degrading/destroying the AQ network. All of those things have been done, and quite well. The problem with Afghanistan is what is known as "mission creep."
I feel that if more effort would've been put into getting Afghanistan on it's feet, that there would've been a lot less problems right now. The invasion of Iraq was probably inevitable but commenced at the wrong time, it diverted attention and resources from Afghanistan to a place that wasn't as much of a problem (at the time).
inane little opines