Last edited by mtb0minime (2010-10-27 14:03:37)
same here tbh.. been a loooooong while...Camm wrote:
I can't remember the last time I played this game... april, I think.
I agree in general to this assessment. It's something DICE fucked up on in my opinion, making it fairly easy to blow up the M-COM stations as opposed to actually setting a charge and waiting it out. My only gripe is that it kind of takes away from what they were trying to accomplish in having to rush, set the charge and control the M-COM station area as you wait out the countdown. Far too often the M-COMs are blown up by a tank camping the outskirts or a c4/UAV/mine combo.PigPopTart wrote:
I don't see why people have such a problem when attackers are blowing up the M-COM with C4, AT Mmines, Tank Shells, ect.
As an attacker, your job is to destroy the M-COM, who cares how you do it? (although I think mortaring it is a babydick tactic, but it's not like you can't kill a sniper....is it?).
If you're defending and this happenes to you, ask yourself; why was the enemy able to get up to the M-COM and plant C4/AT mines or allowed to fire 12 tank rounds and/or mortar the crap out of it?
Spoiler (highlight to read):
because you failed at your job, try harder next time...Derp
I liked it..jsnipy wrote:
Rag on 2142 all you want, the titan concept worked
Last edited by PigPopTart (2010-10-27 19:19:22)
Last edited by PigPopTart (2010-10-27 19:42:33)
Problem is. That they keep track of K/D ratios in Rush. I just know for 100% that 99% of all the kiddies that play Rush now purely play it so they can camp the M-COM's and shoot the poor people that do try to rush them.mtb0minime wrote:
I think they should give points for it. It encourages the team to actually try and destroy the M-Com stations, and the defending team to defend at all costs. Besides, it's important to get points for actually doing shit instead of sitting in the back sniping; even if "doing shit" includes sitting at the home base of Arica Harbor and mortar-sniping the M-Com with a tank
The mode is Rush, the objective of Rush is to blow up stations. You should get a decent amount of points for doing that. Similar to how the objective in conquest is to hold flags, and you get points for defending and capping flags
What are you talking about? When playing Rush as defense, I want my team mates to camp the M-Com's. There are supposed to defend it. More often than not, they rather run around making kills and ignore the M-Com's that needs to get dis-armed.RDMC wrote:
Problem is. That they keep track of K/D ratios in Rush. I just know for 100% that 99% of all the kiddies that play Rush now purely play it so they can camp the M-COM's and shoot the poor people that do try to rush them.mtb0minime wrote:
I think they should give points for it. It encourages the team to actually try and destroy the M-Com stations, and the defending team to defend at all costs. Besides, it's important to get points for actually doing shit instead of sitting in the back sniping; even if "doing shit" includes sitting at the home base of Arica Harbor and mortar-sniping the M-Com with a tank
The mode is Rush, the objective of Rush is to blow up stations. You should get a decent amount of points for doing that. Similar to how the objective in conquest is to hold flags, and you get points for defending and capping flags
Rush would be so much better without the addition of K/D ratios because then nobody would care about sniping in the back, except for the enthousiasts.
My point exactly. Remove K/D Ratio and people will play for the objectives rather than for super z0mg 1337 h4x stats.Ilocano wrote:
What are you talking about? When playing Rush as defense, I want my team mates to camp the M-Com's. There are supposed to defend it. More often than not, they rather run around making kills and ignore the M-Com's that needs to get dis-armed.RDMC wrote:
Problem is. That they keep track of K/D ratios in Rush. I just know for 100% that 99% of all the kiddies that play Rush now purely play it so they can camp the M-COM's and shoot the poor people that do try to rush them.mtb0minime wrote:
I think they should give points for it. It encourages the team to actually try and destroy the M-Com stations, and the defending team to defend at all costs. Besides, it's important to get points for actually doing shit instead of sitting in the back sniping; even if "doing shit" includes sitting at the home base of Arica Harbor and mortar-sniping the M-Com with a tank
The mode is Rush, the objective of Rush is to blow up stations. You should get a decent amount of points for doing that. Similar to how the objective in conquest is to hold flags, and you get points for defending and capping flags
Rush would be so much better without the addition of K/D ratios because then nobody would care about sniping in the back, except for the enthousiasts.
BTW, often times, I often get top score when I ignore my K/D. Namely, suicide runs on the M-Com's.
I never had lag in 2142 and i loved playing moving titan mode, also the pods were very easy to control.FloppY_ wrote:
I liked it..jsnipy wrote:
Rag on 2142 all you want, the titan concept worked
Too bad the lag forced them to cripple it to stationary titans and they made drop pods near-useless
No... at release there were no major problems other than 32v32 man servers lagging a fuckton when titans moved while people where inside...prototype wrote:
I never had lag in 2142 and i loved playing moving titan mode, also the pods were very easy to control.FloppY_ wrote:
I liked it..jsnipy wrote:
Rag on 2142 all you want, the titan concept worked
Too bad the lag forced them to cripple it to stationary titans and they made drop pods near-useless
Maybe it was your system specs or your isp
Aside from the whole inside the Titan part... LMG Campers at every station.. that's great fun.jsnipy wrote:
Rag on 2142 all you want, the titan concept worked
/facepalm
Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-10-30 11:18:09)