i use it on and off to check it out and the game still says i have 0 shots fired and 0 time using it. Kinda hard to get all bronze stars when this weapon won't record any stats. I've seen people with gold stars on it but the game still acts like i don't use it at all. Anyone else have this trouble?
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield Bad Company 2 »
- anyone else still not getting any credit from using the M1?
Yeah, it's a known bug. Happy 1337.
Also M1 is a POS.
Also M1 is a POS.
I like the M1 Garand. It's 2 shot kill most of the time, and 3 shots if you're unlucky.
I like to kill snipers with it. It's so accurate too and reloads fast.
I like to kill snipers with it. It's so accurate too and reloads fast.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Pos?
"Piece of Shit"
I was about to urban-dictionary it, then it hit me xD
I was about to urban-dictionary it, then it hit me xD
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Wrong, it takes 3 bullets, 4 if you're unlucky, has one of the longest reload times of any weapon, and the sights are always off.
I guess you're using the "MY DAD HAS ONE SO I'LL TRY EXTRA HARD" version.
I guess you're using the "MY DAD HAS ONE SO I'LL TRY EXTRA HARD" version.
M1 is great in HC, but then we all have our opinions about HC
It was good in bf1942 ... now its only good if you hit someone with it
i am still having trouble getting this unlock, I am a veteran of bf2 but cant figure out how to get it.
Well so far i have only 1 death from the m1. So i'm guessing it's not all that common/all that good.
Might as well just go modern and use the M14.Rod Foxx wrote:
Well so far i have only 1 death from the m1. So i'm guessing it's not all that common/all that good.
"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"
Might have to do with it not registering stats. Or because it is rather mediocre compared to other semi-auto´s.Rod Foxx wrote:
Well so far i have only 1 death from the m1. So i'm guessing it's not all that common/all that good.
Every weapon in the game is great in HCtheDude5B wrote:
M1 is great in HC, but then we all have our opinions about HC
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
I'll never know where you come up with ideas like that, but I'd rather not find out to be honest.Finray wrote:
Wrong, it takes 3 bullets, 4 if you're unlucky, has one of the longest reload times of any weapon, and the sights are always off.
I guess you're using the "MY DAD HAS ONE SO I'LL TRY EXTRA HARD" version.
The M1 drops in 2 shots (3 if your at long range, like 100m) Finray what are you aiming for? The toe nails?! The sights are on target, I'll make a video to prove it.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
M1 Garand - 34.06 damage - 3 RPK.
owned?
Head shot + body shot = 2 shots to killFinray wrote:
http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb13 … GREC-3.jpg
M1 Garand - 34.06 damage - 3 RPK.
owned?
owned?
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
-Sh1fty- wrote:
Head shot + body shot = 2 shots to killFinray wrote:
http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb13 … GREC-3.jpg
M1 Garand - 34.06 damage - 3 RPK.
owned?
owned?
I'm gonna let this speak for itself then.RDMC wrote:
http://skepticalteacher.files.wordpress … epalm1.jpg-Sh1fty- wrote:
Head shot + body shot = 2 shots to killFinray wrote:
http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb13 … GREC-3.jpg
M1 Garand - 34.06 damage - 3 RPK.
owned?
owned?
m1 is .30 caliber so much more powerful than a 7.62 idk why they gave it the same damage
And I can't figure out why they made MP40 in call of duty world at war do more damage than a Thompson, oh I know why because game developers don't give a shit for actuality..:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
m1 is .30 caliber so much more powerful than a 7.62 idk why they gave it the same damage
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Balance maybe?War Man wrote:
And I can't figure out why they made MP40 in call of duty world at war do more damage than a Thompson, oh I know why because game developers don't give a shit for actuality..:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
m1 is .30 caliber so much more powerful than a 7.62 idk why they gave it the same damage
Another point, but then again a m14 is superior to the m1 Garand and can have a scope right?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Balance maybe?War Man wrote:
And I can't figure out why they made MP40 in call of duty world at war do more damage than a Thompson, oh I know why because game developers don't give a shit for actuality..:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
m1 is .30 caliber so much more powerful than a 7.62 idk why they gave it the same damage
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
M14 doesn't get a scope.War Man wrote:
Another point, but then again a m14 is superior to the m1 Garand and can have a scope right?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Balance maybe?War Man wrote:
And I can't figure out why they made MP40 in call of duty world at war do more damage than a Thompson, oh I know why because game developers don't give a shit for actuality.
The only difference is the M1 has less clip ammo but the M14 has less stored ammo.
You can attach a scope to the M14 though right?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
M14 doesn't get a scope.War Man wrote:
Another point, but then again a m14 is superior to the m1 Garand and can have a scope right?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Balance maybe?
The only difference is the M1 has less clip ammo but the M14 has less stored ammo.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
noWar Man wrote:
You can attach a scope to the M14 though right?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
M14 doesn't get a scope.War Man wrote:
Another point, but then again a m14 is superior to the m1 Garand and can have a scope right?
The only difference is the M1 has less clip ammo but the M14 has less stored ammo.
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield Bad Company 2 »
- anyone else still not getting any credit from using the M1?