mind sharing some details?
umm called her up to plan on going up there or her coming down here like we do all the time. Conversation kind of steered to how/what we are doing, just kind of morphed into a "i don't love you anymore" type thing.
Sorry to hear that Ken.
Cheer up!
Cheer up!
Sometimes you eat the bar and sometimes, well, the bar eats you.
the lead singer of inxs killed himself. not a great band for a cheer up thread.
Last edited by Macbeth (2013-01-11 21:02:14)
Not everyone knows nor needed to know that, Macbeth.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Macbeth is considered an unlucky play because so many of the actors died during their performance.
macbeth is considered an unlucky person.
getoveritandgooutwithsomeoneelse.garthKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Could use some cheering up. Broke up with my girlfriend today
None of the hipsterism makes up for it just not being a good photo.aynrandroolz wrote:
dunno maybe my girlfriend wants to keep an actual object and memento of the visit, rather than a phone she'll replace in 6 months, or a file on a computer somewhere. also the pixel count hardly counts for shit, does it? she has like a £1k DSLR that she could have taken, but you know what? she hasn't used it in like 3 years. digital photos - hi-def, low-soul. not everyone wants to take high-detail shots of flowers or the same stock HDR landscapes. zomg film lacks the megapixels omfgwtf, but film also creates much more interesting lighting and colour palettes. the modern world: choice. isn't it brilliant?Finray wrote:
holy fuck
why?
8MP camera in your iPhone and yet you use that
you are literally the definition of hipster
... but yeah i'm a hipster cause of the choice of photography equipment my girlfriend chooses to use. gg.
cheer up finlay... not everyone can get a hottie with hobbies. there's always that girl with braces from shifty's family photo.
actually i have the exact same vantage taken on my iphone (cause i don't use film cameras, they're complicated). i'll upload it.
here's the exact same vantage, exact same moment, taken on my iphone. with hdr.
it looks flat and shit. even if it is more detailed. wow. digital photography - even on nice DSLR's - has a habit of flattening everything. ever get that effect where you walk into a restaurant or food-joint and all the menus are done in full-colour real-photography? the food looks gross. it's the same effect, for me. nice view? oh great, here's a bunch of flat pixels.
and no, finlay, no. when you develop film, it costs like £1 extra to ALSO have a digital data CD made up for you. not any effort at all. this way, she gets a nice photo album full of her university/relationship memories, and she has the digital scans for whatever online use she has. winning!!!111111 pass the 7 gram rock.
Shouldn't she have a Lomo instead of a disposable?
Be warned though http://www.hayibo.com/hipsters-stunned- … ographers/
Fuck Israel
My droid phone(htc one s) let's me change the ISO and even white balance. Take that iphone.
Last edited by Kimmmmmmmmmmmm (2013-01-14 06:13:21)
she has some pentax afaik. though i'm not gonna dig through her flickr to link you a bunch of her 'serious' photography in defense of some tourist hotspot shot. apologies for a quick snap disposable photo not being 'lined up properly'. didn't realise a bunch of live-at-home internet neckbreathers would be critiquing a simple holiday photo. don't you photograph with film, too, dilbert? you hipster. didn't you know all new digital technology is so much higher-resolution, so much better white balance, so much more convenient, etc.etc.?Dilbert_X wrote:
None of the hipsterism makes up for it just not being a good photo.aynrandroolz wrote:
dunno maybe my girlfriend wants to keep an actual object and memento of the visit, rather than a phone she'll replace in 6 months, or a file on a computer somewhere. also the pixel count hardly counts for shit, does it? she has like a £1k DSLR that she could have taken, but you know what? she hasn't used it in like 3 years. digital photos - hi-def, low-soul. not everyone wants to take high-detail shots of flowers or the same stock HDR landscapes. zomg film lacks the megapixels omfgwtf, but film also creates much more interesting lighting and colour palettes. the modern world: choice. isn't it brilliant?Finray wrote:
holy fuck
why?
8MP camera in your iPhone and yet you use that
you are literally the definition of hipster
... but yeah i'm a hipster cause of the choice of photography equipment my girlfriend chooses to use. gg.
cheer up finlay... not everyone can get a hottie with hobbies. there's always that girl with braces from shifty's family photo.
actually i have the exact same vantage taken on my iphone (cause i don't use film cameras, they're complicated). i'll upload it.
here's the exact same vantage, exact same moment, taken on my iphone. with hdr.
it looks flat and shit. even if it is more detailed. wow. digital photography - even on nice DSLR's - has a habit of flattening everything. ever get that effect where you walk into a restaurant or food-joint and all the menus are done in full-colour real-photography? the food looks gross. it's the same effect, for me. nice view? oh great, here's a bunch of flat pixels.
and no, finlay, no. when you develop film, it costs like £1 extra to ALSO have a digital data CD made up for you. not any effort at all. this way, she gets a nice photo album full of her university/relationship memories, and she has the digital scans for whatever online use she has. winning!!!111111 pass the 7 gram rock.
Shouldn't she have a Lomo instead of a disposable?
Be warned though http://www.hayibo.com/hipsters-stunned- … ographers/
next time we pop over i'll make sure she takes the pentax, and we'll go meet at the pont neuf or pont des arts and reproduce a kertesz for you.
though the disposable seems to do just fine for me, as i said. £3.
more:
http://imgur.com/a/mJw7Q
(that i took with zero photography knowledge or /care, so eat my dick)
Last edited by aynrandroolz (2013-01-15 09:55:17)
it's only the parisiens, or so they want you to believe.aynrandroolz wrote:
p.s. TSI your city smells like urine and shit. you filthy french fucking animals should stop excreting in your own metro.
Last edited by Trotskygrad (2013-01-15 10:14:27)
im down with the filth and grime, really, i've read my baudelaire and we dandied around montmartre more than montparnasse or st germaine de pres, let's put it that way. but really you know something is a little wrong when the metro has, like, little drainage channels running along every single walkway and platform. either they're bad at controlling rainfall... or they're makeshift urinals. the london tube avoids it, anyway.
Last edited by aynrandroolz (2013-01-15 10:30:03)
everybody cheer up! doggies!
He possibly could. He knows how to use a camera.coke wrote:
I'm sure you could better, on what I'm assuming is a totally manual camera. As in you have to do more than just press a button.Finray wrote:
well for someone who has a 1k dslr she can't shoot for shit. White balanced is off, focus is terrible, those pictures aren't even level.aynrandroolz wrote:
dunno maybe my girlfriend wants to keep an actual object and memento of the visit, rather than a phone she'll replace in 6 months, or a file on a computer somewhere. also the pixel count hardly counts for shit, does it? she has like a £1k DSLR that she could have taken, but you know what? she hasn't used it in like 3 years. digital photos - hi-def, low-soul. not everyone wants to take high-detail shots of flowers or the same stock HDR landscapes. zomg film lacks the megapixels omfgwtf, but film also creates much more interesting lighting and colour palettes. the modern world: choice. isn't it brilliant?
... but yeah i'm a hipster cause of the choice of photography equipment my girlfriend chooses to use. gg.
cheer up finlay... not everyone can get a hottie with hobbies. there's always that girl with braces from shifty's family photo.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
turkey and greece have serious problems with stray/feral dogs. what you don't see is that afterwards the winning team have these two mongrels in a döner
Well then cheer up cause those looked like some delicious as fuck doggies.
The hipster has a point, most French towns stink of dogshit.aynrandroolz wrote:
im down with the filth and grime, really, i've read my baudelaire and we dandied around montmartre more than montparnasse or st germaine de pres, let's put it that way. but really you know something is a little wrong when the metro has, like, little drainage channels running along every single walkway and platform. either they're bad at controlling rainfall... or they're makeshift urinals. the london tube avoids it, anyway.
Oh and its St Germain des Pres.
Fuck Israel
to be honest, almost every other metro I've been on (LA, Chicago, NY, Washington DC, Helsinki, London) doesn't stink that bad.aynrandroolz wrote:
im down with the filth and grime, really, i've read my baudelaire and we dandied around montmartre more than montparnasse or st germaine de pres, let's put it that way. but really you know something is a little wrong when the metro has, like, little drainage channels running along every single walkway and platform. either they're bad at controlling rainfall... or they're makeshift urinals. the london tube avoids it, anyway.
I think it's a uniquely french problem.
How do you know if you're depressed?
nothing cheers you up