BF2s Overclocking thread

2008-08-16 06:02:34

#1

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6680|cuntshitlake

Now it's about time we make this, BF2s OC showoff thread. This "competition" is split in two separate tables, the max OC speed table and the max OC % table. To get your OC on the table post a screenshot of your CPU-Z main screen showing your overclock (get CPU-Z here). This is not a stability competition, the fact that you have booted to Windows is enough of a stability proof. If same speed/percentace appears, AMD wins and then cheaper CPU wins.

You do not have to post anything else, I will automatically add you to both tables and count your OC %. Everyone can post max 3 results, one per CPU. If you want your result to be updated, post a new screen and tell it's for the same CPU.

DISCLAIMER! IF YOU DECIDE TO GO SUICIDE RUN FOR RESULTS, I TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY OF DESTROYED HARDWARE. OVERCLOCK AT YOUR OWN RISK, AND ONLY IF YOU KNOW WHAT DO DO.

Here come the tables:

MAX OC SPEED	MAX OC SPEED	MAX OC SPEED	MAX OC SPEED	MAX OC SPEED
1	ig	E8400	4.752GHz	1.408
2	Freezer7Pro	E7400	4.725GHz	1.670
3	max	E8400	4.700GHz	-
4	menzo2003	E8400	4.400GHz	1.424
5	.Sup	E8400	4.320GHz	1.384
6	Freezer7Pro	E7200	4.313GHz	1.520
7	cyborg_ninja-117	E8500	4.275GHz	1.440
8	The Sheriff	E8500	4.256GHz	1.368
9	IrishGrimReaper	E8500	4.124GHz	1.344
10	Drykill	Q6600	4.110GHz	1.616
11	The_Sniper_NM	E8400	4.050GHz	1.328
12	Sydney	E8500	4.010GHz	1.376
13	GC_PaNzerFIN	i7 920	4.010GHz	1.296
14	menzo2003	Celeron 430	4.005GHz	1.536
15	Little BaBy JESUS	E8400	4.000GHz	1.264
16	Mitch92uK	E8400	4.000GHz	1.368
17	DeathUnlimited	Q9550	4.000GHz	1.408
18	dalmar72	E3110	3.870GHz	1.310
19	ghettoperson	E6550	3.780GHz	-
20	dill13	E8400	3.780GHz	1.216
21	GC_PaNzerFIN	E6750	3.700GHz	1.448
22	DeathUnlimited	E2180	3.600GHz	1.616
23	DeathUnlimited	E6600	3.600GHz	1.620
24	aimless	E6750	3.600GHz	1.312
25	Jussimies	E6700	3.600GHz	1.376
26	Defiance	E8400	3.510GHz	1.264
27	Beduin	X6800	3.500GHz	1.368
28	Gooners	Q9450	3.496GHz	1.248
29	GC_PaNzerFIN	E2180	3.450GHz	1.616
30	Moist.Niek	E8400	3.420GHz	1.200
31	james@alienware	E6700	3.370GHz	1.304
32	GC_PaNzerFIN	Q6600	3.330GHz	1.312
33	jsnipy	E6850	3.300GHz	1.232
34	haffeysucks	Q9300	3.300GHz	1.368
35	']['error.V2	E6600	3.200GHz	1.408
36	Poseidon	E6600	3.200GHz	1.416
37	ig	E6750	3.200GHz	1.408
38	GGF0RCE	4800+X2	3.175GHz	1.424
39	CodePhoenix	6000+X2	3.150GHz	1.184
40	bob9f6	E6300	3.150GHz	1.360
41	CrazeD	4800+X2	3.070GHz	1.392
42	Scratch[USA]	E6600	3.000GHz	1.424
43	Stimey	Q6700	3.000GHz	1.224
44	Naturn	5000+X2	2.912GHz	1.232
45	B00MH3ADSH0T	E6300	2.800GHz	1.136
46	MECtallica	4000+X2	2.760GHz	1.376
47	Swope	E6300	2.500GHz	1.296
48	Freezer7Pro	2600+	2.305GHz	1.872
MAX OC %	MAX OC %	MAX OC %	MAX OC %
1	menzo2003	Celeron 430 1.8GHz @ 4.005GHz	122%
2	DeathUnlimited	E2180 2.0GHz @ 3.600GHz	80%
3	GC_PaNzerFIN	E2180 2.0GHz @ 3.450GHz	72.5%
4	Drykill	Q6600 2.4GHz @ 4.110GHz	71.5%
5	Freezer7Pro	E7200 2.53GHz @ 4.313GHz	70.5%
6	bob9f6	E6300 1.86GHz @ 3.150GHz	69.5%
7	Freezer7Pro	E7400 2.80GHz @ 4.725GHz	69%
8	ghettoperson	E6550 2.33GHz @ 3.780GHz	62%
9	ig	E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.752GHz	58.5%
10	max	E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.700GHz	56.5%
11	B00MH3ADSH0T	E6300 1.86GHz @ 2.800GHz	50.5%
12	DeathUnlimited	E6600 2.4GHz @ 3.600GHz	50%
13	GC_PaNzerFIN	i7 920 2.66GHz @ 4.010GHz	50%
14	menzo2003	E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.400GHz	46.5%
15	.Sup	E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.320GHz	44%
16	DeathUnlimited	Q9550 2.83GHz @ 4.000GHz	41.5%
17	GC_PaNzerFIN	E6750 2.66GHz @ 3.700GHz	39%
18	GC_PaNzerFIN	Q6600 2.4GHz @ 3.330GHz	39%
19	cyborg_ninja-117	E8500 3.16GHz @ 4.275GHz	37%
20	Jussimies	E6700 2.66GHz @ 3.600GHz	35.5%
21	aimless	E6750 2.66GHz @ 3.600GHz	35.5%
22	The_Sniper_NM	E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.050GHz	35%
23	Swope	E6300 2.5GHz @ 2.500GHz	34.5%
24	The Sheriff	E8500 3.166GHz @ 4.256GHz	34.5%
25	']['error.V2	E6600 2.4GHz @ 3.200GHz	33.5%
26	Poseidon	E6600 2.4GHz @ 3.200GHz	33.5%
27	Mitch92uK	E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.000GHz	33.5%
28	Little BaBy JESUS	E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.000GHz	33.5%
29	haffeysucks	Q9300 2.5GHz @ 3.300GHz	32%
30	Gooners	Q9450 2.66GHz @ 3.496GHz	31.5%
31	IrishGrimReaper	E8500 3.166GHz @ 4.124GHz	30.5%
32	dalmar72	Xeon E3110 3.0GHz @ 3.870GHz	29%
33	GGF0RCE	4800+X2 2.5GHz @ 3.175GHz	27%
34	james@alienware	E6700 2.66GHz @ 3.370GHz	26.5%
35	Sydney	E8500 3.166GHz @ 4.010GHz	26.5%
36	dill13	E8400 3.0GHz @ 3.780GHz	26%
37	Scratch[USA]	E6600 2.4GHz @ 3.000GHz	25%
38	CrazeD	4800+X2 2.5GHz @ 3.070GHz	23%
39	ig	E6750 2.66GHz @ 3.200GHz	20.5%
40	Freezer7Pro	2600+ 1.917GHz @ 2.305GHz	20%
41	Beduin	X6800 2.93GHz @ 3.500GHz	19.5%
42	Defiance	E8400 3.0GHz @ 3.510GHz	17%
43	MECtallica	4000+ 2.4GHz @ 2.760GHz	15%
44	Moist.niek	E8400 3.0GHz @ 3.420GHz	14%
45	Stimey	Q6700 2.66GHz @ 3.000GHz	13%
46	Naturn	5000+X2 2.6GHz @ 2.912GHz	12%
47	jsnipy	E6850 3.0GHz @ 3.300GHz	10%
48	CodePhoenix	6000+X2 3.0GHz @ 3.150GHz	5%

_{In ranking when the "score" is the same, these rules always apply, in this order: AMD > Intel // Older socket > Newer socket // Single Core > Dualcore > Quadcore // Lower spec'd model > Higher spec'd model.}

No credits to Freezer from his table <3

Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2009-02-11 15:00:23)

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-08-16 06:10:38

#2

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6414|Winland

I MADE THE GROUNDS FOR THAT TABLE AND LET DU COPY IT FORM MY SUPERPI THREAD. HE DOESN'T CREDIT ME, SO I CREDIT MYSELF, CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT!

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-16 06:14:48

#3

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6680|cuntshitlake

Mah OC

https://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u155/UnlimitedDeath/SPiwin.png

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-08-16 06:54:24

#4

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6866

Dude, you need to correct my entry. Much as I would like a 4.75Ghz OC I can't quite make it.

2008-08-16 06:59:25

#5

menzo: ̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#; +616|6663|Amsterdam‫

https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/3gH.jpg

Last edited by menzo2003 (2009-02-11 14:58:25)

https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png

2008-08-16 07:55:57

#6

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7060|Reykjavík, Iceland.

From superpi thread since my pc died

https://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i194/PBAsydney/Desktop/pimod.jpg

3.5GHz on E6600

2008-08-16 08:04:00

#7

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6680|cuntshitlake

Added all from SuperPi thread and Menzo's Celly 430. CPU that is.

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-08-16 08:14:08

#8

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5967|شمال

I have an X6800 @ 3.2 Not much
stock cooling FTL!

EDIT:

https://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/Middleeaster/CPUSCORE-1.jpg

Last edited by Beduin (2008-08-16 08:32:39)

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2008-08-16 08:15:47

#9

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6680|cuntshitlake

Beduin wrote:
I have an X6800 @ 3.2 Not much
stock cooling FTL!

I can add it if you provide a CPU-Z screenshot.

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-08-16 08:32:12

#10

Stimey: +786|6337|Ontario | Canada

Actually my Q6700 is at 3.0Ghz
Stupid motherboard D:

Last edited by Stimey (2008-08-16 08:35:01)

2008-08-16 08:32:25

#11

i g: Banned; +876|6081|GA

my e6750 sucks and cant get any higher than 3.3. we got my friend's to go to 3.8 in my computer

2008-08-16 09:15:48

#12

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6414|Winland

https://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/Freezer7Pro/cpuz2300.png

AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton, stock 1.917GHz. 20% OC. Stupid mobo won't let me set NB voltage, so I can't go over 2.3 stable. It's incredible how mucht he nForce sucks at FSB over 200.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-16 09:37:28

#13

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6680|cuntshitlake

Freezer7Pro wrote:
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … uz2300.png

AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton, stock 1.917GHz. 20% OC. Stupid mobo won't let me set NB voltage, so I can't go over 2.3 stable. It's incredible how mucht he nForce sucks at FSB over 200.

Chocolate rain FTW

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-08-16 13:04:59

#14

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6670|The Twilight Zone

I just wanted to say I can never make an 80% OC on air since my CPU has a 45nm structure and it doesn't allow such high vcores. Still nice OC DU and good thread!

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2008-08-16 13:05:37

#15

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6755|Long Island, New York

DeathUnlimited wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … uz2300.png

AMD Athlon XP 2600+ Barton, stock 1.917GHz. 20% OC. Stupid mobo won't let me set NB voltage, so I can't go over 2.3 stable. It's incredible how mucht he nForce sucks at FSB over 200.
Chocolate rain FTW

QFT

2008-08-16 13:52:41

#16

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6414|Winland

.Sup wrote:
I just wanted to say I can never make an 80% OC on air since my CPU has a 45nm structure and it doesn't allow such high vcores. Still nice OC DU and good thread!

It's because your CPU is 3GHz stock. If it was 2GHz stock, you'd get a much higher % OC.

Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-08-16 13:53:37)

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-16 13:54:32

#17

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6670|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:
.Sup wrote:
I just wanted to say I can never make an 80% OC on air since my CPU has a 45nm structure and it doesn't allow such high vcores. Still nice OC DU and good thread!
It's because your CPU is 3GHz stock. If it was 2GHz stock, you'd get a much higher % OC.

+ cos of its architecture

2008-08-16 15:53:55

#18

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6414|Winland

.Sup wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
.Sup wrote:
I just wanted to say I can never make an 80% OC on air since my CPU has a 45nm structure and it doesn't allow such high vcores. Still nice OC DU and good thread!
It's because your CPU is 3GHz stock. If it was 2GHz stock, you'd get a much higher % OC.
+ cos of its architecture

A 2GHz 45nm can very well do an OC of 3.6GHz. Just look at mine, it's a 45nm dual, a quite poor one, too, that's done a 70% oc on air. On LN2, it's been to 5.3GHz.

It's all about stock speeds, you see. Your CPU runs at 3GHz stock. My CPU, for example, runs at 2.53GHz stock. Clocking my CPU to 3GHz already presents an 18% overclock. My CPU at 3.6 is 49%, whilst your CPU on 3.6 is only overclocked my 20%.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-16 16:00:55

#19

i g: Banned; +876|6081|GA

i cant tell a difference between 2.66 and 3.2 ghz

i highly doubt any of you can either

2008-08-16 16:10:08

#20

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6414|Winland

i g wrote:
i cant tell a difference between 2.66 and 3.2 ghz

i highly doubt any of you can either

That's because 2.66 to 3.2 is nothing. 20%, gimme a break. I run on around 50% for everyday use, and it's certainly a difference. 50% more PPD, heavily increased gaming performance... Yes thank you.

OCing rarely has any effect on stuff like word processing, or things where other pieces of hardware present bottlenecks.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-16 16:11:26

#21

aimless: Member; +166|6342|Texas

i g wrote:
i cant tell a difference between 2.66 and 3.2 ghz

i highly doubt any of you can either

Try rendering 30 minute video in vegas or 10 min audio in Fl Studio.

My vcore is 1.312v

2008-08-16 17:01:19

#22

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6755|Long Island, New York

i was just about to put down my name but then I saw I was on there

yay, i suppose?

oh; and:

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v702/osgood35nyi/New%20Computer/firstOC.jpg

Last edited by Poseidon (2008-08-16 17:03:05)

2008-08-16 17:18:41

#23

Ryan: Member; +1,230|7060|Alberta, Canada

I'm still rocking my completely stock E6300 @ 1.86GHz.

2008-08-16 18:16:35

#24

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6680|cuntshitlake

Ryan wrote:
I'm still rocking my completely stock E6300 @ 1.86GHz.

Noes, those CPUs are awesome overclockers, it's a waste to leave one @ stock :S

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-08-16 19:21:31

#25

Defiance: Member; +438|6888

Freezer7Pro wrote:
I MADE THE GROUNDS FOR THAT TABLE AND LET DU COPY IT FORM MY SUPERPI THREAD. HE DOESN'T CREDIT ME, SO I CREDIT MYSELF, CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT!

For a simple table done in, essentially, HTML?

BF2S Forums BF2s Overclocking thread

Beduin wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

i g wrote:

i g wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Board footer