BF2S Forums [oot Ds] ?

Because.

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

kptk92 wrote:

Because.

Nintendo can make a game about burning orphans and so long as it has Mario is it, the thing will sell >5 million copies.

I'd buy it but still with that in mind, if nintendo can make any game with a first party character and sell millions... then why didn't they remake OOT?

Spidery_Yoda wrote:

Because Nintendo these days is run by mindless fools.

If they weren't we'd not only have OOT remakes, but games like F-Zero DS, Goldeneye etc

We have goldeneye but I don't see why one of their most popular games isn't remade, it bothers me

Spidery_Yoda wrote:

EA's game is not Goldeneye.

Nintendo just don't like publishing proper games anymore I guess. An OOT re-make would sell like hotcakes. But they just want to push their non-game crap on everyone instead.

I'm starting to like Nintendo less and less these days...

EA's version of Goldeneye was shit because Bond died (I never knew if he was alive again because I only finished the first level and never played again because it was shit)

So quantum of solace...involves EA?

Flecco wrote:

K. Guys, Goldeneye64 can't be re-released on anything without the big rubber stamp of EA approval as they own the rights to Bond.


As for an F-Zero and OoT port... Yeah, fuck them. I'd buy a DS if they would do that shit. Seriously. That would be two doses of epic win in a fucking box.

super smash bros. DS

thread.

Last edited by Acreta (2008-07-19 17:04:24)

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Come on guys, think of the controls. It doesn't pan out, at all. Mario is move, jump, crouch. Zelda you need move, A, B, full c controls (okay, well maybe not Navi) plus the shoulder buttons. Personally I didn't think Phantom Hourglass felt like a Zelda game at all because of the controls, and I would be disappointed if they released anything but a perfect port of such a great game.

I guess you're right, I bet they had a discussion over at nintendo about the controls. But I bet they could keel a and B and only have 2 weapons to be selected instead of 3 (i.e. all handheld zeldas) sure it wouldn't be exactly the same but it can be done

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Come on guys, think of the controls. It doesn't pan out, at all. Mario is move, jump, crouch. Zelda you need move, A, B, full c controls (okay, well maybe not Navi) plus the shoulder buttons. Personally I didn't think Phantom Hourglass felt like a Zelda game at all because of the controls, and I would be disappointed if they released anything but a perfect port of such a great game.

move with touch screen, tap it to jump/move up on ledge.

directional pads replace the C buttons (slingshot, bomb, longshot, etc)

Flecco wrote:

Acreta wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Come on guys, think of the controls. It doesn't pan out, at all. Mario is move, jump, crouch. Zelda you need move, A, B, full c controls (okay, well maybe not Navi) plus the shoulder buttons. Personally I didn't think Phantom Hourglass felt like a Zelda game at all because of the controls, and I would be disappointed if they released anything but a perfect port of such a great game.

move with touch screen, tap it to jump/move up on ledge.

directional pads replace the C buttons (slingshot, bomb, longshot, etc)

ACRETA WRITE THIS TO NINTENDO NOW. REQUEST THEY PORT MM AND OOT NAO!

AND MAKE MOAR ZELDA AND FZERO.


And yes, Quantumn of Solace = EA.

Yes.

Will you buy me a DS?

Flecco wrote:

Acreta wrote:

Yes.

Yes.

Thanks.

Acreta wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Come on guys, think of the controls. It doesn't pan out, at all. Mario is move, jump, crouch. Zelda you need move, A, B, full c controls (okay, well maybe not Navi) plus the shoulder buttons. Personally I didn't think Phantom Hourglass felt like a Zelda game at all because of the controls, and I would be disappointed if they released anything but a perfect port of such a great game.

move with touch screen, tap it to jump/move up on ledge.

directional pads replace the C buttons (slingshot, bomb, longshot, etc)

This coming from someone who has clearly never played Zelda, because if he had he would know that THERE IS ONLY AUTO JUMP.

Movement with the touch screen is balls. I played through all of Super Mario 64 DS moving with the D pad because I was much more precise with it than moving with the touch screen, not to mention the ergonomics of holding that little pen in one hand while closely trying to use the buttons with the other. The touchscreen aspect is one of my least favorite in LOZ:PH as well.

Also, remember you have to use both shoulder buttons (if you're using L for target and R for shield, there's definitely no Z on the DS) and that means you have to do it funny with your index finger.